Page 26 of 37

[COM] Re: #U/C: 20HS | 53/49m | 15/14lvls | Hotel/Residential

Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:39 pm
by Pikey
From Saturday

Image

Image

[COM] Re: #U/C: 20HS | 53/49m | 15/14lvls | Hotel/Residential

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:59 pm
by jk1237
starting to go up now

Image

[COM] Re: #U/C: 20HS | 53/49m | 15/14lvls | Hotel/Residential

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:42 am
by Ben
Another Crane? :)


Image

[COM] Re: #U/C: 20HS | 53/49m | 15/14lvls | Hotel/Residential

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:19 am
by Pikey
nah, looks like a service elevator/ventilation.services shaft.

[COM] Re: #U/C: 20HS | 53/49m | 15/14lvls | Hotel/Residential

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:25 am
by Ben
I was joking lol :)

Both sites are progressing quite quickly.

[COM] Re: #U/C: 20HS | 53/49m | 15/14lvls | Hotel/Residential

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 11:56 am
by skyliner
jk1237 wrote:starting to go up now

Image
I actually saw 2 cranes as close as this in Brisbane CBD about 2 months ago on the same project - could'nt believe what I saw! Looked physically and operationally absurd.

BTW - get rid of the 'BLOCK' next door, even as open grassed area - it IS absurd next to such a site/bldg as this. It looks like a corner in some tinpot town!

ADELAIDE - TOWARDS A GREATER CITY SKYLINE

[COM] Re: #U/C: 20HS | 53/49m | 15/14lvls | Hotel/Residential

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 2:10 pm
by AtD
skyliner wrote:BTW - get rid of the 'BLOCK' next door, even as open grassed area - it IS absurd next to such a site/bldg as this. It looks like a corner in some tinpot town!
I disagree! While it's no inspiring design it adds life at street level thanks to its alfresco areas and retail tenancies. An open grassed area would be surrounded by the blank wall of 20HS and the service entrance to the Hungry Jacks car-park's retailers - hardly an improvement.

[COM] Re: #U/C: 20HS | 53/49m | 15/14lvls | Hotel/Residential

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 2:34 am
by Pistol
Which block are we talking about?

[COM] Re: #U/C: 20HS | 53/49m | 15/14lvls | Hotel/Residential

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 3:55 am
by crawf
The ugly blue building between Pulteney, York Street and Hindmarsh Square.

Isn't there future plans to demolish it and replace it with a mid/high rise?

[COM] Re: #U/C: 20HS | 53/49m | 15/14lvls | Hotel/Residential

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 10:42 am
by Shuz
Yes, or so the council has been informed. That's why they had to leave a blank wall on the western side.

[COM] Re: #U/C: 20HS | 53/49m | 15/14lvls | Hotel/Residential

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 11:23 am
by AtD
Shuz wrote:Yes, or so the council has been informed. That's why they had to leave a blank wall on the western side.
Any development on a property boundary must have a blank wall, unless the neighboring property is heritage listed (and even that's no guarantee as we learned with 200 North Tce). I don't remember hearing any plans for that corner. The presence of a blank wall only means a development is possible, not that it's planned.

[COM] Re: #U/C: 20HS | 53/49m | 15/14lvls | Hotel/Residential

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 6:55 pm
by Will
From December 21:

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

[COM] Re: #U/C: 20HS | 53/49m | 15/14lvls | Hotel/Residential

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:15 pm
by Shuz
Thanks Will for the updates. Looking at that display board, it seems that the project actually consists of two seperate towers? I thought It was just one uniform building, but divided into two sections - one as the hotel and as residential. Can anyone clarify/confirm this?

[COM] Re: #U/C: 20HS | 53/49m | 15/14lvls | Hotel/Residential

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:22 pm
by Will
Shuz wrote:Thanks Will for the updates. Looking at that display board, it seems that the project actually consists of two seperate towers? I thought It was just one uniform building, but divided into two sections - one as the hotel and as residential. Can anyone clarify/confirm this?
Shuz, the project comprises 2 separate buildings.

[COM] Re: #U/C: 20HS | 53/49m | 15/14lvls | Hotel/Residential

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 11:11 pm
by mattblack
Yep 2 seperate building. They will have nothing to do with eachother once built. The Intercontinental group is apparently looking closley into the hotel.