[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2014 9:09 am
You know the rule about not arguing about whose football team is better outside 'the pub'?
Well you do now.
Well you do now.
Adelaide's Premier Development and Construction Site
https://mail.sensational-adelaide.com/forum/
https://mail.sensational-adelaide.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3335
That was said planned carpark. The only one I heard about anyway.how good is he wrote:How big is the new car park built under the Eastern stand ie how many cars (roughly) does it fit? I was told its just for players, officials, coaches etc...Wasn't there a plan to build a major car park as part of the development...can't remember where...anyone know what happened to that idea?
I believe the major carpark you speak of (please correct me if I'm wrong) was being considered for the western side of the Morphett Bridge (where the Uni's will be building their medical facilities), obviously this was prior to any other plans developing for that area.joshyboy wrote:That was said planned carpark. The only one I heard about anyway.how good is he wrote:How big is the new car park built under the Eastern stand ie how many cars (roughly) does it fit? I was told its just for players, officials, coaches etc...Wasn't there a plan to build a major car park as part of the development...can't remember where...anyone know what happened to that idea?
Kochie was saying on the radio yesterday that the northern carpark (Light's Vision) was only 60% full on Showdown day because so many extra people caught public transport.
New figures show more people are turning out each week to watch AFL at revamped Adelaide Oval
Tim Williams
The Advertiser
April 29, 2014 4:35PM
THE launch of AFL in the city has produced a boom in crowd numbers, up more than 40 per cent on the same time last season.
The average crowd after the first five matches at the new Adelaide Oval has been 45,184, compared with 31,772 for the first five games at AAMI Stadium in 2013.
Sports Minister Leon Bignell said an extra 67,000 people had already passed through the gates at Adelaide Oval and the soaring attendances were “providing an enormous economic boost for South Australian football”.
Mr Bignell said the government was working to attract both the fans and corporate backers of interstate clubs.
“They didn’t like coming to Adelaide when they had to play at Football Park but now that it’s Adelaide Oval they can’t wait to get here and show their fans and their corporate sponsors the best footy stadium in Australia,” he said.
“We’re encouraging supporters to come for the game and stay on for the Barossa, McLaren Vale or many other beautiful regions we have on offer.
“The best money we can have in our economy is the money that comes from the pockets of visitors from Victoria, Western Australia, NSW and Queensland.
“With hundreds, if not thousands of interstate fans set to converge on Adelaide each weekend, for at least 20 weeks of the year, this is a huge economic boost for Adelaide and our regions and is really cementing our reputation as a vibrant and enticing destination.”
The Round 2 Showdown crowd of 50,397 was close to 10,000 more than the 40,707 who came to the Crows-Power clash in Round 3 last year.
The lowest crowd so far this season was 36,321 when Port Adelaide played Brisbane.
By this time last year there had been three AAMI Stadium crowds of less than 27,000.
TV schedule is worked out at the same time as the fixture and there are no changes. Generally it's the Friday night game, Saturday afternoon, Saturday night, and Sunday afternoon games on Channel 7. Only round that has a chance of getting certain games on certain channels is the final round, but the main reason for that is to ensure teams playing Finals don't play on the Sunday if at all possible.Patrick_27 wrote:Yeah, it would be nice if I could actually watch an AFL game at Adelaide Oval on free-to-air televisin here in Melbourne. And here I thought the Port and Geelong game would be a priority for free-to-air because it was the top two playing, but no it obviously wasn't.