Page 29 of 39

Re: #PRO: Gawler East and Environs development

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 7:22 pm
by RayRichards
The Potts/Cheek Roads alignment need to be pretty much a dual carraigeway from the Barossa Valley highway and Main North Roads. Would very much help vehicle movements from this estate/Barossa Valley as a whole towards Elizabeth way.

I think the best way is to also go Northwards and connect up to the Sturt highway and form a ring road around Gawler for freight purposes and containing the urban sprawl now infecting Gawler.

For the development to really work. The local railway line needs to follow the freight route from Gawler Central and add Gawler East and Concordia to Adelaide Metros next two new stations built after the completion of the Seaford and Seaford Meadows.

Cheers.

Ray.

#PRO: Roseworthy Garden Town

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 1:50 am
by fabricator
from: http://www.bunyippress.com.au/news/1337 ... -released/
(note need free account to view full article)
Roseworthy is expected to become the second biggest city in South Australia over the next 40 years

Only metropolitan Adelaide will be larger than Roseworthy under a plan lodged this week with Light Regional Council.

After months of community consultation and stakeholder forums, the Roseworthy Alliance – the group charged with leading the anticipated expansion of the town – has handed over its final concept plan for the project.

The council was last night expected to discuss the document at its meeting, which was held after The Bunyip’s deadline.

It was anticipated LRC would opt to defer consideration of the plan until its November 22 meeting in order to give it time to properly consider the proposal and seek community feedback.

If the council approves the proposal, it will then begin the rezoning process.

However, The Bunyip has obtained a copy of the Roseworthy Garden Town draft concept plan and can exclusively reveal what is planned for the town.

As previously reported in The Bunyip, the population of Roseworthy is expected to grow to about 60,000 people under the State Government’s 30-year Plan for Greater Adelaide.

The final concept plan outlines the Alliance’s development proposal for 3134 hectares of land at Roseworthy. It is anticipated the project will reach capacity by 2053.

The development is expected to take on a grid format, with the final concept plan incorporating elements of a number of previously considered plans.

It will be bordered by Perry, Mudla Wirra, Mallala, Cliff and Twartz roads.

To the east of the development and existing township, an expanded industrial zone will be established.

Under the comprehensive plan, there will be one town centre, five neighbourhood centres, eight local centres, four high schools and nine primary schools.

"The town centre is designed to accommodate department stores, supermarkets, a wide range of specialty stores, restaurants, cafés and markets," the plan reads.

The neighbourhood centres will be smaller than the town centre and will feature shops, schools, parks and businesses.

Local centres will be smaller again and will include shops and parks.

The proposed plan shows a green belt will be created around the development area to ensure Roseworthy remains a town unto itself.

This land could be used for recreation, sports and primary production.

A green buffer will also be established between the new development and the existing township of Roseworthy.

"A strong sense of arrival into Roseworthy Garden Town from Main North Road will be achieved with a tree-lined boulevard," it reads.

"This will lead to the south side of the central park, which will host sports facilities, a lake and green parklands."

"The central park is large to accommodate sports ovals, courts, playgrounds, bicycle and walking trails, major outdoor events, a sports centre and aquatic centre."

The concept plan shows existing farm homesteads will be retained and the land around them converted into parks.

The document also indicates Roseworthy will become a "university town".

"It is anticipated that the University of Adelaide’s Roseworthy Campus will expand beyond its current boundaries and integrate into the new town centre and become an integral part of the social and economic fabric of the place," it reads.

The plan allows for a range of residential allotment sizes, with land set aside for standard residential blocks, medium density housing and high density residential development.

The plan also proposes public transport, including a passenger train and bus service, for the town.

Despite the time lines set out in the document, the staging of the development will be influenced by market conditions, and the provision of services, employment opportunities and educational facilities.

According to the plan, land should be available for purchase by the beginning of 2014.

Re: #PRO: Roseworthy Garden Town

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 12:52 pm
by crawf
Hello future Adelaide sprawl

Re: #PRO: Roseworthy Garden Town

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 3:00 pm
by metro
yay sprawl. :roll:

but at least it's not in the Barossa :?

Re: #PRO: Roseworthy Garden Town

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 2:53 pm
by Omicron
It's less hateful than Buckland Park, that's for sure, and it will help take housing pressure off of the Barossa. One of the more noticeable consequences of the new Northern Expressway, perhaps?

Re: #PRO: Roseworthy Garden Town

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 3:17 pm
by [Shuz]
What's the point of having an urban growth boundary if the state government is just going to blatantly ignore the purpose of them?

And even so, the irony lies in the fact that the Gawler township lies right on the edge of the urban boundary which we know and is classified as 'Greater Adelaide', of which the policy of the region is that urban growth/sprawl shan't extend beyond the imaginary lines drawn.

However that policy doesn't apply to the Barossa region - and the policy/rules in fact actually encourages urban sprawl/growth to occur... would you believe it... right at the doorstep of the existing Greater Adelaide urban footprint.

A round of applause for the lads over at DPLG/DTEI/DPTI.
:wallbash: :toilet:

Re: #PRO: Roseworthy Garden Town

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 4:36 pm
by Wayno
There's already sprawl a few km further out at Freeling. So this *could* be considered infill development :roll:

Re: #PRO: Roseworthy Garden Town

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 1:23 pm
by rhino
Still within commuting distance of Adelaide - this is going to become just another outer suburb. I would much rather they moved it way further out, like Kadina or Balaklava, and really create a large regional centre.

Re: #PRO: Roseworthy Garden Town

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 1:48 pm
by crawf
Or I would rather they build infill development between Blakeview and Evanston Park, so it's closer to existing services and the city in general.

It makes more sense to do that instead of building at Buckland Park, Two Wells, Freeling and now Roseworthy. Gawler already feels like an outer suburb of Adelaide.

Re: #PRO: Roseworthy Garden Town

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 10:35 am
by Waewick
the positves being the ability to have the train line in place IMO.

Re: #PRO: Roseworthy Garden Town

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 10:50 am
by rhino
At this stage the standard gauging and electrification is only proposed to go as far as Gawler. Roseworthy is on the broad gauge, though one would assume this will change? I would hope that electrification is continued to this development if it goes ahead, but I would rather the development was much further away, as I said before.

Re: #PRO: Roseworthy Garden Town

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 11:09 am
by Waewick
sorry, I thought I read in the article that they were going to have a train line.

but agreed, slightly further out would be good.

Re: #PRO: Roseworthy Garden Town

Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 5:39 pm
by skyliner
More sprawl. Yawn. Loss of good ag. land.

What happened to the TODs idea taking much of the growth as well as continuing to infill current suburbs? Do we NEED this kind of sprawl? Look at Brisbane - a huge area with massive infrastructure problems and expenses - so much so that the quality of life is being affected to the point where pop growth is slowing markedly.

I agree with Rhino here - definitely needs an electrified line.

Lasly, I can't see a blurring of boundaries with Gawler being avoided - it will keep on growing as well with an overall pop of maybe 80000 - 90000 up there.

I wonder how much of this is to do with money overpowering previously set plans and common sense?

ADELAIDE - TOWARDS A GREATER CITY SKYLINE

Re: Playford Alive Project

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:37 am
by PeFe
More than $14m for housing project adverts
Image
MORE than $14 million will be spent advertising State Government housing projects at Playford Alive and Bowden, in competition with the private sector..
The projects will be The Land Management Corporation, which has downgraded its sales forecasts for the next four years, has revealed it has a budget of $14.1 million for the two projects in coming years.

Developers are anxious about being in competition with the State Government, as the industry grapples with a sluggish market and rising infrastructure costs.

The Housing Industry Association said new housing starts in South Australia were at their lowest level in a decade.

Urban Development Institute of Australia SA executive director Terry Walsh said its members developing land in the northern suburbs were unable to match the LMC's budget.

The Playford Alive urban renewal project, which covers Davoren Park and Smithfield Plains, has a marketing budget of $7.8 million until 2017, which represents about 3.69 per cent of total project expenditure.

"Both the Playford Alive urban renewal project and the Bowden development have marketing budgets that have been established in accordance with development industry norms," LMC chief executive Wayne Gibbings said.

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/taxpayers ... 6236028893

Re: Playford Alive Project

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 7:58 am
by Waewick
hopefully Bowden isn't as ugly and lifeless as Playford Alive - poor streetscape, poor building interaction and crappy design.