[PRO] Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in areas other than the CBD and North Adelaide. Includes Port Adelaide and Glenelg.
Message
Author
Mpol02
Legendary Member!
Posts: 584
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:06 am

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#46 Post by Mpol02 » Fri Oct 04, 2024 4:25 pm

Omg hahah

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3306
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#47 Post by [Shuz] » Fri Oct 04, 2024 9:30 pm

The materials are better, but the form / massing is worse.

This really needs to go back to the drawing board again at 6 or 7 levels maximum and broken up into segments to break up the mass.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

User avatar
baytram366
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 467
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:06 pm
Contact:

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#48 Post by baytram366 » Tue Oct 08, 2024 9:54 am

All i can see is that crap Hungry Jacks car park. They might as well just put a HJ's sign on it and call it a day.
Baytram 366's Flickr:

www.flickr.com/photos/baytram366

User avatar
timtam20292
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1480
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:03 pm

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#49 Post by timtam20292 » Sat Nov 16, 2024 11:14 am

Firies responded to a structural fire here. Smoke seen coming from hotel.

abc
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1246
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:35 pm

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#50 Post by abc » Sat Nov 16, 2024 12:09 pm

timtam20292 wrote:
Sat Nov 16, 2024 11:14 am
Firies responded to a structural fire here. Smoke seen coming from hotel.
that old Adelaide solution... if we can't build it, burn it down
tired of low IQ hacks

User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2780
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

[PRO] Re: [PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#51 Post by ChillyPhilly » Sat Nov 16, 2024 3:04 pm

timtam20292 wrote:Firies responded to a structural fire here. Smoke seen coming from hotel.
Oh the convenience.
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

User avatar
notmichaeljfox
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 124
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 5:16 pm

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#52 Post by notmichaeljfox » Sat Nov 16, 2024 3:35 pm

Police investigate circumstances around blaze at historic Buckingham Arms Hotel in Adelaide's inner-north
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-11-16/ ... /104609862

Image

Police are investigating the circumstances around a construction fire which broke out at a historic hotel site in Adelaide's inner north.

The Metropolitan Fire Service (MFS) and South Australian police were called to The Buckingham Arms Hotel in Gilberton after 11am on Saturday following reports of a fire.

Walkerville Terrace and Northcote Terrace are closed to all traffic as firefighters work to extinguish the fire.

A significant amount of toxic smoke was billowing from the building and blowing in a south-easterly direction.

Image

The MFS issued a warning advising nearby residents to remain indoors with their windows and doors closed.

The hotel – which was first opened in about 1846 – is currently under renovation with plans to build a 10-storey apartment building submitted to the State Commission Assessment Panel (SCAP) last month.

The Adelaide establishment was well-known for its smorgasbord before its closure in 2022.

SA Police ask anyone who noticed any suspicious activity or has any information about the fire to contact Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000.

User avatar
Algernon
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1630
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 9:46 pm
Location: Moravia

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#53 Post by Algernon » Sat Nov 16, 2024 8:43 pm

Change thread title to [SWP]

Nort
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2300
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#54 Post by Nort » Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:20 pm

Algernon wrote:
Sat Nov 16, 2024 8:43 pm
Change thread title to [SWP]
:hilarious: :hilarious: :hilarious:

User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2780
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#55 Post by ChillyPhilly » Wed Dec 11, 2024 4:28 pm

A scaled down three-storey townhouse development behind the local heritage listed Buckingham Arms Hotel in Gilberton has been granted planning approval – but a 10-storey apartment project is still on the cards.

https://www.indailysa.com.au/citymag/de ... reen-light
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3791
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#56 Post by Waewick » Fri Dec 13, 2024 1:23 pm

That's disappointing but one i probably understand.

Mind you, additional cars on that intersection isn't going to end well, especially slowing down to turn in/out


Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2581
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#57 Post by Patrick_27 » Fri Dec 13, 2024 2:56 pm

Fucking Walkerville. Seriously, anywhere else in inner-city Adelaide would have to wear it if a med-density development was put forward and approved, but of course, the smallest, most exclusive suburb/council in Adelaide manages to persuade a scaled down proposal within its boundaries. Old money wins again.

User avatar
Bobski
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2024 9:20 pm

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#58 Post by Bobski » Sat Dec 14, 2024 2:37 pm

Went past this site today 14/12 to check out the damage from the "accidental fire", and it's far more extensive than the news reports conveyed. Many of the windows are smashed and the site could be accessed very easily from any angle.

If the developers are serious about saving the heritage components of this site they should probably put something more substantial in place than the flimsy and comically-named "make safe" fence, lest a second "accidental fire" break out.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 2 guests