Not a fan of the shade flaps in Victoria Sq either. The also look cheap and nasty.ChillyPhilly wrote: ↑Mon Jan 15, 2018 11:49 amThe flaps needed to be made of thin metal, like the similar design element at Victoria Square.
News & Discussion: Laneway & Streetscape Projects
Re: News & Discussion: Laneway Revitalisation Projects
Re: News & Discussion: Laneway Revitalisation Projects
Waymouth Street between Topham Mall and King William Street may finally get the footpath widening the council promised a few months ago. Bollards and equipment are on site.
Re: News & Discussion: Laneway Revitalisation Projects
Let's take stock of some of the laneway/public realm projects we have happening in the city:
Completed
-Bank Street
-Topham Mall North
-Hindley Street West
-Peel Street
-Kintore Avenue/ANZAC Memorial
In Progress
-Waymouth Street East
-Frome Street
Planned 2018
-Gawler Place (March)
-Topham Mall South
-Bentham Street
-North Terrace East
Planned after 2018
-Festival Plaza
-Station Road/Lane
-Pitt Street
Proposed/Discussed Officially
-North Terrace West
-Twin Street
-George Street
Apart from the ones I've listed, I would like to see the following streets worked on:
-Grenfell and Currie Street (Major overhaul with bus bays, trees, footpath upgrade)
-Clarendon Street between Hindley Street and Flinders Street (once bus depot closes in a year or so, narrow street, plant trees and increase width of footpath)
-Rosina Street (Shared Space, add trees)
-Victoria Square
I also believe a number of lanes between Gouger Street East and Wright Street East should be turned into shared spaces.
Any that I've missed? What should we focus on next?
Completed
-Bank Street
-Topham Mall North
-Hindley Street West
-Peel Street
-Kintore Avenue/ANZAC Memorial
In Progress
-Waymouth Street East
-Frome Street
Planned 2018
-Gawler Place (March)
-Topham Mall South
-Bentham Street
-North Terrace East
Planned after 2018
-Festival Plaza
-Station Road/Lane
-Pitt Street
Proposed/Discussed Officially
-North Terrace West
-Twin Street
-George Street
Apart from the ones I've listed, I would like to see the following streets worked on:
-Grenfell and Currie Street (Major overhaul with bus bays, trees, footpath upgrade)
-Clarendon Street between Hindley Street and Flinders Street (once bus depot closes in a year or so, narrow street, plant trees and increase width of footpath)
-Rosina Street (Shared Space, add trees)
-Victoria Square
I also believe a number of lanes between Gouger Street East and Wright Street East should be turned into shared spaces.
Any that I've missed? What should we focus on next?
Last edited by Norman on Sun Jan 28, 2018 11:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: News & Discussion: Laneway Revitalisation Projects
Add Victoria Square as high priority and I’m in full agreement!
Keep Adelaide Weird
Re: News & Discussion: Laneway Revitalisation Projects
Vines have been planted, I noticed them last night.timtam20292 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 15, 2018 12:58 pmWhen are the vines being planted? Not now because of the heat?
Re: News & Discussion: Laneway Revitalisation Projects
Thanks Norman for the above update - really accurate.
One thing I've often thought is that when a street or laneway is upgraded, there's often a lot of fanfare - sometimes in the case of Bank Street rightly so - it looks great. However not all streets in Adelaide necessarily need really expensive glossy treatments to look a bit better - as in not all need artwork, granite pavements, etc. Many streets such as Flinders / Franklin / Morphett which haven't really been touched in decades could just do with new flagstone pavements, better lighting and more trees and greenery.
I've only been to Melbourne a few times but the streetscaping there does seem a little more consistent with paving, trees, etc.
There's also the issue of quality- Leigh Street was only upgraded twenty years ago with stone paving, street furniture and trees and yet the pavement is cracked and in need of replacement - these sort of upgrades should really last 50 or 100 years - in many European cities they've managed to maintain laneways with cobblestones for hundreds of years and seemingly upgrade water, electricity and other services without disturbing pavements. Apologies for the negative bit at the end but just some random thoughts.
The work on Rundle Mall four years ago looks like holding up well however, so well done for the work on that.
One thing I've often thought is that when a street or laneway is upgraded, there's often a lot of fanfare - sometimes in the case of Bank Street rightly so - it looks great. However not all streets in Adelaide necessarily need really expensive glossy treatments to look a bit better - as in not all need artwork, granite pavements, etc. Many streets such as Flinders / Franklin / Morphett which haven't really been touched in decades could just do with new flagstone pavements, better lighting and more trees and greenery.
I've only been to Melbourne a few times but the streetscaping there does seem a little more consistent with paving, trees, etc.
There's also the issue of quality- Leigh Street was only upgraded twenty years ago with stone paving, street furniture and trees and yet the pavement is cracked and in need of replacement - these sort of upgrades should really last 50 or 100 years - in many European cities they've managed to maintain laneways with cobblestones for hundreds of years and seemingly upgrade water, electricity and other services without disturbing pavements. Apologies for the negative bit at the end but just some random thoughts.
The work on Rundle Mall four years ago looks like holding up well however, so well done for the work on that.
Re: News & Discussion: Laneway Revitalisation Projects
Interesting re: pavement treatments in Europe. In the case of Prague and to a lesser extent Brno, the reason the cobblestone streets last so long is because they're not permanent, they're stones set in stand and can be pulled in and out at will. Certainly you'll see stones out of place all over the place and can easily hurt yourself if you don't watch where you walk. The reason these semi permanent cobblestone streets last for centuries is they're maintained daily, and when you do underground works you can simply rip the stones out then put them back in, sweep the sand over and done.Joelmark wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:13 amThanks Norman for the above update - really accurate.
One thing I've often thought is that when a street or laneway is upgraded, there's often a lot of fanfare - sometimes in the case of Bank Street rightly so - it looks great. However not all streets in Adelaide necessarily need really expensive glossy treatments to look a bit better - as in not all need artwork, granite pavements, etc. Many streets such as Flinders / Franklin / Morphett which haven't really been touched in decades could just do with new flagstone pavements, better lighting and more trees and greenery.
I've only been to Melbourne a few times but the streetscaping there does seem a little more consistent with paving, trees, etc.
There's also the issue of quality- Leigh Street was only upgraded twenty years ago with stone paving, street furniture and trees and yet the pavement is cracked and in need of replacement - these sort of upgrades should really last 50 or 100 years - in many European cities they've managed to maintain laneways with cobblestones for hundreds of years and seemingly upgrade water, electricity and other services without disturbing pavements. Apologies for the negative bit at the end but just some random thoughts.
The work on Rundle Mall four years ago looks like holding up well however, so well done for the work on that.
IT's one of those things I notice walking around and say to myself we can't do it in Australia. Those cobblestone streets would average a lawsuit a day in a place like Adelaide.
Re: News & Discussion: Laneway Revitalisation Projects
And rightly so. Cobblestone streets are beautiful, but one of the main reasons is that they have historical significance and fit the surroundings. Putting cobblestones on an Adelaide street would be the tacky equivalent of putting brick veneer wallpaper on a concrete wall.
Re: News & Discussion: Laneway Revitalisation Projects
I'm sad to see that Peel Street is "Completed". There is so much more that could be done with Peel Street, which has so much pedestrian activity, many cafes / small bars etc. The beautification has a long way to go IMO
cheers,
Rhino
Rhino
- timtam20292
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1457
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:03 pm
Re: News & Discussion: Laneway Revitalisation Projects
Yep I saw them today.Brando wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 1:56 amVines have been planted, I noticed them last night.timtam20292 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 15, 2018 12:58 pmWhen are the vines being planted? Not now because of the heat?
Re: News & Discussion: Laneway Revitalisation Projects
I’ve been thinking about those flaps and I came to this conclusion:
Even if you think it's subjectively ugly, we should be encouraging developers to be more daring with their design. Some polarising flaps around the city is a heck of a lot more interesting than the same bland shit we normally get. We certainly don't need any more designs with garden boxes and pods and aluminium panels and the the odd but of road painted in some highlight colour.
If you think this looks like it's from a war zone, pull your head out of your hyperbolic arse. That's the same nonsense as when people describe a development as "future slums", despite not in the least bit resembling a real slum.
I would say leave the flaps alone as from the words of Paul Rand said that “The public is more familiar with bad design than good design. It is, in effect, conditioned to prefer bad design, because that is what it lives with. The new becomes threatening, the old reassuring. – Paul Rand.”
Even if you think it's subjectively ugly, we should be encouraging developers to be more daring with their design. Some polarising flaps around the city is a heck of a lot more interesting than the same bland shit we normally get. We certainly don't need any more designs with garden boxes and pods and aluminium panels and the the odd but of road painted in some highlight colour.
If you think this looks like it's from a war zone, pull your head out of your hyperbolic arse. That's the same nonsense as when people describe a development as "future slums", despite not in the least bit resembling a real slum.
I would say leave the flaps alone as from the words of Paul Rand said that “The public is more familiar with bad design than good design. It is, in effect, conditioned to prefer bad design, because that is what it lives with. The new becomes threatening, the old reassuring. – Paul Rand.”
- timtam20292
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1457
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:03 pm
Re: News & Discussion: Laneway Revitalisation Projects
Don’t think Nathan will appreciate having his words copied and pasted. Yet another bizarre post from you which I find very distracting from actual thread discussion.
Re: News & Discussion: Laneway Revitalisation Projects
No, the flaps are shitHiTouch wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 11:55 pmI’ve been thinking about those flaps and I came to this conclusion:
Even if you think it's subjectively ugly, we should be encouraging developers to be more daring with their design. Some polarising flaps around the city is a heck of a lot more interesting than the same bland shit we normally get. We certainly don't need any more designs with garden boxes and pods and aluminium panels and the the odd but of road painted in some highlight colour.
If you think this looks like it's from a war zone, pull your head out of your hyperbolic arse. That's the same nonsense as when people describe a development as "future slums", despite not in the least bit resembling a real slum.
I would say leave the flaps alone as from the words of Paul Rand said that “The public is more familiar with bad design than good design. It is, in effect, conditioned to prefer bad design, because that is what it lives with. The new becomes threatening, the old reassuring. – Paul Rand.”
Re: News & Discussion: Laneway Revitalisation Projects
Yeah sure mate. Chill. I quoted 2 inspirational people. Paul Rand and Nathan. Did you actually read what i said?timtam20292 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2018 2:17 am
Don’t think Nathan will appreciate having his words copied and pasted. Yet another bizarre post from you which I find very distracting from actual thread discussion.
Obviously the flaps are a little bit mattered now but (when fixed or replaced with better material) I say leave them alone for the future to decide. Without them, apart from a few concrete blocks Topham Mall will look no different.
Last edited by HiTouch on Fri Feb 02, 2018 7:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests