Page 33 of 43

[COM] Re: #U/C: Conservatory on Hindmarsh | 62m | 18lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 7:16 pm
by Norman
Thanks Pikey! Great photos!

[COM] Re: #U/C: Conservatory on Hindmarsh | 62m | 18lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 11:53 am
by UrbanSG
Pic taken today:

Image

[COM] Re: #U/C: Conservatory on Hindmarsh | 62m | 18lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 12:39 pm
by Shuz
This ones topped out by now surely? I can't see the corebox anymore. It's at a nice height - not too dominating, but brings an element of height to the area.

[COM] Re: #U/C: Conservatory on Hindmarsh | 62m | 18lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 7:54 am
by Allkai
Yep, topped now.

[COM] Re: #U/C: Conservatory on Hindmarsh | 62m | 18lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 3:32 pm
by crawf
That glass is hot!

[COM] Re: #U/C: Conservatory on Hindmarsh | 62m | 18lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:50 pm
by jk1237
a few shots while in the area today

Image

Image

Image

Image

shaping up very nice indeed :D

[COM] Re: #U/C: Conservatory on Hindmarsh | 62m | 18lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 7:01 pm
by AtD
Loving the reflections in the glass! Can't wait for the entire facade to be covered! :)

[COM] Re: #U/C: Conservatory on Hindmarsh | 62m | 18lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:01 pm
by frank1
NIce pics

IMO this is the best looking development adelaide has seen since the 80's

[COM] Re: #U/C: Conservatory on Hindmarsh | 62m | 18lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 4:17 am
by Pistol
Balustrades are looking good

[COM] Re: #U/C: Conservatory on Hindmarsh | 62m | 18lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:18 am
by Shuz
frank1 wrote:NIce pics

IMO this is the best looking development adelaide has seen since the 80's
Lol, was anything supposed to look good in the 80s?

[COM] Re: #U/C: Conservatory on Hindmarsh | 62m | 18lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:41 am
by Ben
From the weekend:


Image

Image

[COM] Re: #U/C: Conservatory on Hindmarsh | 62m | 18lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 4:52 pm
by AtD
I really love that first photo Ben!

I know the facade pieces that are up so far are tantalisingly magnificent, but we must remember that only the office section will look like this. The car park section, at least looking at the renders, threatens to ruin the look of this building.

[COM] Re: #U/C: Conservatory on Hindmarsh | 62m | 18lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:44 pm
by mattblack
AtD wrote:I really love that first photo Ben!

I know the facade pieces that are up so far are tantalisingly magnificent, but we must remember that only the office section will look like this. The car park section, at least looking at the renders, threatens to ruin the look of this building.

Cant see how the glass louvers over the carpark would ruin much.

[COM] Re: #U/C: Conservatory on Hindmarsh | 62m | 18lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:32 pm
by Omicron
mattblack wrote:
AtD wrote:I really love that first photo Ben!

I know the facade pieces that are up so far are tantalisingly magnificent, but we must remember that only the office section will look like this. The car park section, at least looking at the renders, threatens to ruin the look of this building.

Cant see how the glass louvers over the carpark would ruin much.
Is that what they're meant to be? I never could tell.

[COM] Re: #U/C: Conservatory on Hindmarsh | 62m | 18lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 9:24 am
by mattblack
Omicron wrote:
mattblack wrote:
AtD wrote:I really love that first photo Ben!

I know the facade pieces that are up so far are tantalisingly magnificent, but we must remember that only the office section will look like this. The car park section, at least looking at the renders, threatens to ruin the look of this building.

Cant see how the glass louvers over the carpark would ruin much.
Is that what they're meant to be? I never could tell.
Yeh, I went into the display centre the other day and it looks as though it will be small blue glass louvres covering the carpark area. We'll have to wait I guess.