#Official Mining Thread

Developments in Regional South Australia. Including Port Lincoln, Victor Harbor, Wallaroo, Gawler and Mount Barker.
Message
Author
User avatar
AG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2093
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#496 Post by AG » Sat Nov 01, 2008 8:51 am

These two articles by The Advertiser and The Australian have different takes on the information, and even some of the information is contradicting.
Election twist to Roxby expansion plan
CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL, BUSINESS EDITOR
October 31, 2008 11:30pm
BHP Billiton wants government approval for its multi-billion-dollar expansion of Olympic Dam a month before the next state election.

In the firmest detail yet of its timetable, the mining company said yesterday it intended to begin digging the open-pit expansion in 2010 if it gets ministerial approval in February that year.
With voters going to the polls on March 20, 2010, the State Government will be under pressure to sign off on the project – the biggest economic development in South Australia's history.

BHP told the stock exchange yesterday it would present its environmental impact statement on the expansion to the Government before the end of 2008.

The statement will be made public in April or May, 2009.

A spokesman for Treasurer Kevin Foley said BHP Billiton's announcement was "consistent" with the miner's private briefings.

"The Government expects the environmental impact statement produced by BHP Billiton to be reviewed and finalised within the timeline indicated," the spokesman said.

SA Chamber of Mines and Energy chief executive Jason Kuchel welcomed the announcement. "This sends a clear message to all those who may have tried to cast doubt on the project," he said.

"From the chamber's perspective, we were never in any doubt about it proceeding."

One of the key issues to be debated with the Government is how much ore would be smelted here and how much would be exported as a concentrate.

As reported by The Advertiser in December last year, Mr Foley has said the Government was prepared to compromise on the issue.

'While much of the copper would be exported as concentrate, less than 20 per cent of the uranium would be shipped in that form, with 80 per cent processed at Olympic Dam, BHP said yesterday.

Opposition mineral resources spokesman David Ridgway said there was "great anticipation" about the project. "The Opposition fully supports BHP Billiton's development of a staged timetable for the expansion," he said.

"The economic benefits for SA are exciting and with BHP Billiton planning to build major infrastructure many thousands of South Australians are set to benefit."

BHP Billiton's president of uranium and Olympic Dam development, Graeme Hunt, said the expansion would transform the state's economy.

A Deloitte report, which BHP will publish with its environmental impact statement, says the mine will increase state gross product by 9 per cent by 2040. "More than 80 per cent of the value-add from this expansion will remain in SA," Mr Hunt said.

About 4000 workers are now employed at the copper, uranium and gold mine.

The mine workforce is expected to more than double to 8500 while the construction workforce will peak at more than 6500. This will provide an enormous boost to the dormitory town of Roxby Downs as well as the whole state.

BHP is in the "pre-feasibility" stage where it decides on an expansion plan. It has not updated its cost estimates for several years but speculation has ranged from $6 billion to $30 billion.

Olympic Dam will be expanded in stages with Stage 1 – the optimisation of the existing underground operation – to be in production by 2013.

If Government approvals are obtained and the BHP board gives the go-ahead on the open pit, digging will start in 2010.

It will then take four to five years removing about a million tonnes a day of overburden to reach the ore.

The open-pit mine will be a 100-year project, creating a hole 1.22km deep and about 6.5km long.

By contrast, the Escondida mine in Chile will be 885m deep when exhausted while the Bingham Canyon Mine in Utah, which began production in 1906, is 1.2km deep and about 4km long.
BHP delays opening of world's biggest pit
Matt Chambers | November 01, 2008
BHP Billiton has pushed back the start date for its giant Olympic Dam copper and uranium expansion until at least 2015.

This was to include digging the world's biggest open-pit mine.

In a long-awaited presentation, the mining giant was tight-lipped on development costs, which have been tipped by analysts to be $15 billion, and indicated it would not reveal them until the project was approved, in 2010 at the earliest.

BHP's ambitious plans for the deposit will see it ramp up in three major stages over 10 or 11 years, with the planned, huge pit eventually eating into the existing underground mine and mill around 2025.

The end result would be a pit 7km long, 5km wide and 1km deep that dwarfs the current contenders for world's biggest pit -- the Escondida copper mine in Chile and Bingham Canyon copper mine in the US.

The earliest start date of 2015 pushes first production back from a previous forecast of 2013 or 2014 given in late 2006.

The miner took analysts and investors around the operations yesterday and released notes of the presentation that yielded more information on timing, but nothing on costs.

Rio Tinto, which is the subject of a $US90 billion ($136 billion) takeover bid from BHP, is targeting Olympic Dam as it tries to secure a better bid than BHP's 3.4-for-1 scrip offer.

Rio sees the project, which will take five years of earthmoving just to get to the orebody, as long, expensive and risky and says shareholders should know the cost of it if they are considering swapping their shares for BHP's.

BHP views the expansion as being at too early a stage to include in any of its growth targets.

In June, BHP chief executive Marius Kloppers ensured yesterday's presentation would be closely watched when he flagged it and said it would include "a very complete update of where we stand on that investment decision (Olympic Dam) and exactly what we want to do."

BHP repeated plans for a staged production increase to 730,000 tonnes a year of copper, from about 180,000 now and 19,000 tonnes of uranium from 4000, but did not give a timeline for each phase. The first stage will boost copper production to about 350,000 tonnes, the second to 540,000 and the final one to 730,000 at 2025 at the earliest.

The company plans to ship concentrate to China for smelting through Adelaide and Darwin, with 80 per cent of the uranium processed at Olympic Dam.

BHP said government approval was not expected until 2010, back from an earlier target of 2008. An optimisation study would bring copper production to 200,000 tonnes in 2013.

BHP said the new mill, when ramped up fully, would have a throughput of 60 million tonnes of ore and revenue per tonne of ore of more than three times that of Escondida.

BHP also flagged its plans to quickly develop the Yeelirrie uranium deposit in Western Australia, now that a Liberal state government not opposed to uranium mining is in power.

BHP is looking at a 10 to 12 year operation and said it would upgrade the feasibility study on the resource of about 35,000 tonnes of uranium oxide to determine the best way to develop it.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#497 Post by Wayno » Sat Nov 01, 2008 4:37 pm

http://newsstore.smh.com.au/apps/previe ... 6BHP&f=pdf

here's my personal ODX & BHP Exec summary:
  • * Expand underground: The existing underground odx mine operations are currently being expanded - this should deliver an extra $50m pa as royalties to the SA Govt by 2011-ish. Enough for both sides of politics to make many many election promises in 2010
    * 5 years: The move to a massive open cut ODX mine will take five years - the starting for this 5 year period remains unclear
    * They say later, but more likely sooner: The open cut mine *may* get delayed, but more likely it will be fast tracked if worldwide demand for uranium grows as expected. BHP already has demand for ALL its 1st stage ODX uranium through ~2013 (without considering any of china's massive future demand). As an example, China used 3000billion kwh of electricity last year, and is expected to expand annually at a rate of 400billion kwh (as a comparison, the entire UK used 400billion kwh last year - wow!)
    * Nuclear industry: BHP will process uranium on site in south australia (this is good and will foster a local nuclear knowledge industry)
    * Where there's smoke there's fire: BHP has a license over large tracts of land immediately around the ODX site, and are actively exploring for more large mining opportunities to leverage the ODX infrastructure (fingers crossed, here's hoping they find another few ODX sized deposits nearby!)
    * Fess up or shut up: BHP remains under pressure from Rio Tinto to provide much more detailed ODX expansion plan details. Rio's shareholders can't support BHP's 1:3.4 script takeover proposal unless BHP comes clean in this respect
The really good news is that Paul Holloway (Planning Minister) is leading the ODX effort for the SA Govt. He's an inspirational leader who continues to deliver wins for SA - i'd love to meet the guy some day!
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
skyliner
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2359
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:16 pm
Location: fassifern (near Brisbane)

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#498 Post by skyliner » Sat Nov 01, 2008 5:25 pm

Well Wayno, you did beat me to it! I was scanning the AFR constantly and hardly a word - found that most odd.

Anyway, fantastic news - no longer a rustbucket or a joke, this state stands to be at the front of the rest over time. It has the only 100 year mine and it's massive. Can see the CBD changing markedly in a short time. V. exciting :D :D

It would be worth a really close look at the Chinese plans for nuclear power and itemising here on this thread. I know it is V. extensive having seen 3 figure estimates of coming nuclear power sources.

SA - STATE ON THE MOVE
Jack.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#499 Post by Wayno » Sun Nov 02, 2008 7:56 pm

Reading between the lines

It seems the SA Govt might have tried a bit too hard to coerce BHP into smelting its copper local in Sth Australia. The article below pangs of BHP using the 2010 state election to get their way - Rann & Foley must be spewing :lol: The potential upside to this argy-bargy is that the SA Govt *might* approve the mine expansion much earlier, could even be early-2009 instead of feb-2010 as stated below...

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/ ... 64,00.html
BHP Billiton has given the firmest indication yet of its timetable for the multi-billion dollar expansion of Olympic Dam - and South Australian state politics has emerged as a factor in its timing.

The mining giant said yesterday it intended to begin digging the open pit expansion in 2010, providing it wins approval from the South Australian Government in February that year.

With South Australian voters going to the polls on March 20, the State Government will be under pressure to sign off on the project - the biggest economic development in South Australia's history.


BHP told the stock exchange yesterday it would present its crucial environmental impact statement on the expansion to the Government before the end of this year.

A spokesman for SA Treasurer Kevin Foley said the BHP announcement was consistent with the miner's private briefings.

One of the key issues to be debated with government is how much ore would be smelted in South Australia and how much would be exported as a concentrate.

While much of the copper would be exported as concentrate, less than 20 per cent of the uranium would be shipped in that form with 80 per cent processed at Olympic Dam, BHP said yesterday.

The expansion will transform South Australia's economy said Graeme Hunt, BHP Billiton's president of uranium and Olympic Dam development.

A Deloitte report, which BHP will publish with its environmental impact statement, says the mine will increase state gross product by 9 per cent by 2040.

"More than 80 per cent of the value-add from this expansion will remain in SA," Mr Hunt said.

About 4000 workers are now employed at the copper, uranium and gold mine.

The mine workforce is projected to more than double to 8500 while the construction workforce will peak at more than 6500.

BHP has not updated its cost estimates for several years but speculation has ranged from $6 billion to $30 billion.

If government approvals are obtained and the BHP board gives the go-ahead digging will start in 2010. It will then take four to five years removing about a million tonnes a day of overburden to reach the ore.

The open pit mine will be a 100-year project, creating a hole 1.22km deep and about 6.5km long.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
Shuz
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2539
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Glandore

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#500 Post by Shuz » Mon Nov 03, 2008 9:54 am

Well for economic development's sake, let's hope the Government just get it signed and done with.

User avatar
Will409
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1038
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:12 am
Location: Parafield Gardens

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#501 Post by Will409 » Mon Nov 03, 2008 10:08 am

Fingers crossed it does go ahead. The Government (I hope) is smart enough to realise that this is too big an oppurtunity to pass up and let fly into the wind. There is simply too much at stake.
Image LINK TO YOUTUBE PROFILE.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#502 Post by Wayno » Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:49 pm

Excuse me, i've got Gas

There's an industry focus on finding more gas reserves. The good news is that South Australia's basin geography lends itself to holding large quantities of easily extractable gas - and here's the latest proof...
http://www.thewest.com.au/default.aspx? ... tID=105964
Beach Petroleum says it has made a significant gas discovery northwest of the Moomba processing plant in South Australia's Cooper Basin.

The oil and gas producer has estimated the Brownlow-1 discovery - 55 kilometres northwest of Moomba - could potentially contain a resource in the range of seven to 14 billion cubic feet (Bcf) of gas.

Beach Petroleum said the Brownlow-1 discovery gave the company confidence that fields of up to 100 Bcf may exist along the western flank of the Cooper Basin.

Brownlow-1 is a joint venture between Beach Petroleum and Drillsearch Energy.
there's another related article here http://www.abnnewswire.net/press/en/588 ... lease.html with this statement being the most interesting:
Mr Nelson said, "The success of Brownlow-1 gives greater confidence that fields of up to 100 BCF potential may exist along the western flank in subtle traps of this nature."
We can expect more large gas discoveries in our backyard!
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 3650
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Glenelg

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#503 Post by SRW » Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:42 pm

Will409 wrote:Fingers crossed it does go ahead. The Government (I hope) is smart enough to realise that this is too big an oppurtunity to pass up and let fly into the wind. There is simply too much at stake.
At the same time, they have to make sure that SA gets as much out of this as possible and not let BHP make a profit at the state's expense. It's a difficult balance.
Keep Adelaide Weird

frank1
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 439
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:54 pm

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#504 Post by frank1 » Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:50 pm

Did anyone see that article in the paper today about Copper Range moving its head office from Sydney to Adelaide? Can't seem to find the article in-line though.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#505 Post by Wayno » Wed Nov 12, 2008 7:40 pm

frank1 wrote:Did anyone see that article in the paper today about Copper Range moving its head office from Sydney to Adelaide? Can't seem to find the article in-line though.
Their AGM is Nov 27, so i suspect more details will come after then...
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7566
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#506 Post by Ben » Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:32 am

Ben wrote:Hopeully a start of many relocations.
New exploration head office

Published: 10 Oct 2008 Category: Investing in SA

ASX-listed copper exploration company Copper Range Limited is moving its head office from Sydney to Adelaide, to be closer to its South Australian tenements.

Managing director Rob Scargill says the company is focused on exploring for giant copper-gold targets on the Gawler Craton, exploiting short-term cash flow opportunities on the Adelaide Fold Belt.

The company’s Gawler Craton tenements are in prospective locations around BHP Billiton’s massive Olympic Dam mine and the Carrapateena deposit.

Copper Range’s current exploration includes areas around the historic copper towns of Kapunda and Burra, as well as sites near Hawker and Peterborough in the State’s Mid North.

While the focus is on copper-gold, the company has recently reported high-grade iron assay results that are being investigated.

UrbanSG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 1848
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 8:55 am

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#507 Post by UrbanSG » Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:17 pm

GRD Minproc has secured another Olympic Dam contract and further to the article below, in today's Advertiser the company has said it will be opening an Adelaide office ramping up to 50 staff over the next year, they are currently searching for office space.

From The West Australia yesterday:
GRD Minproc wins $15m contract

12th November 2008, 9:30 WST

GRD’s engineering division, GRD Minproc, has secured a $15 million contract for a further three years of work on BHP Billiton’s Olympic Dam project, the company has announced.

Under the deal, Minproc will provide engineering services for BHP’s studies of processing technologies of uranium, copper and gold ores on the project, seeking to maximise mineral recovery, efficiency and safety on the project.

The company had previously provided preliminary engineering work for a demonstration uranium processing plant on the project last year.

GRD shares were steady at 43 cents at 9.19am.

ANDREW HOBBS

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#508 Post by Wayno » Fri Nov 14, 2008 3:14 pm

Nuclear Power in Australia - To be or not to be?

In my opinion, SA should act quickly to establish a full-lifecycle nuclear power industry. Dig it up, process it, use it, and bury it again...

http://www.mineweb.com/mineweb/view/min ... &sn=Detail
Australia needs to join the nuclear energy community

Ziggy Switkowski, former head of Australia’s biggest telecommunications company, Telstra, says Australia has no choice but to consider nuclear power as part of its future energy mix.

The 34th annual Essington Lewis Memorial Lecture in Adelaide to commemorate the BHP Billiton leader who drove that mining house's move into steelmaking, was told tonight that nuclear energy must be considered if Australia is to meet its carbon reduction targets.

Dr Ziggy Switkowski is a nuclear scientist who headed the nuclear energy study for Australia's previous Prime Minister John Howard and chairs the Australian Nuclear Science & Technology Organisation. He said even if there happened to be "supersonic" progress in development of renewable energy sources, and the successful rollout of energy productivity and carbon capture technologies, nuclear power would have to be considered in the mix.

"I am concerned that the exclusion of nuclear power from our national conversation and energy debate represents a triumph of political pragmatism over good policy," Dr Switkowski said.

When it comes to generation of base load electricity - the 80% of electricity needed for round-the-clock to power our refrigerators, washing machines, plasma televisions, traffic lights and other demands must take in nuclear energy as well as coal, gas, oil and hydro-electricity.

(Three years ago when John Howard pushed for the Switkowski-led study media feedback was that a majority of Australians supported uranium mining but the pendulum swung the other way to be marginally negative on nuclear power. This feedback probably drove Kevin Rudd -later Prime Minister -- to get the Australian Labor Party to overturn its anti-growth policy for uranium mining).

In his lecture Switkowski said that If fossil fuels are excluded because they are "dirty", and the risks to hydro-electricity from water scarcity were considered, then the only available "clean option" for base-load electricity is nuclear power.

Nuclear power offers compelling arguments for deployment in Australia, including its proven 24/7 base load capacity, the country's plentiful reserves of uranium, and generating costs that compare favourably with coal and gas fired power generation.

"Deep greenhouse gas emission reductions will almost certainly prove beyond the capability of existing technologies and renewable energy platforms to deliver in the time allowed," he said.

"Our lights will start to go out as investment in clean base load energy generation stalls in an uncertain regulatory environment and the nuclear alternative is not validated.

"In a carbon-constrained future, nuclear-powered economies will exploit their cost advantages for clean energy in competing with Australian products newly burdened by embedded carbon costs."

Switkowski said 31 countries representing two-thirds of humanity currently use nuclear power to produce some of their electricity. About 15% of electricity worldwide is nuclear-generated, 23% within the OECD, and 31% of the European Union.

"Why not Australia?," he asked.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

fasterthanlids
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:22 am

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#509 Post by fasterthanlids » Sat Nov 15, 2008 11:40 am

I like the extra benefits of developing such an industry - extra skilled jobs, opportunities for uni-leaving engineers and technicians - strike while the iron is hot methinks. The state could/should be a world leader given the resources it possesses under space. Along with the (pie in the sky?) hot rocks project in the Cooper Basin, energy production and technology should be a real growth industry for the state, and particularly the regional cities in the Mid North.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#510 Post by Wayno » Sat Nov 15, 2008 2:37 pm

fasterthanlids wrote:I like the extra benefits of developing such an industry - extra skilled jobs, opportunities for uni-leaving engineers and technicians - strike while the iron is hot methinks. The state could/should be a world leader given the resources it possesses under space. Along with the (pie in the sky?) hot rocks project in the Cooper Basin, energy production and technology should be a real growth industry for the state, and particularly the regional cities in the Mid North.
yep, nail on the head. We have lots of sun, wind, coastline, uranium, hot rocks..."SA The Energy State"
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest