News & Discussion: Low/Mid-Rise CBD Development

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
User avatar
Omicron
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2336
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#526 Post by Omicron » Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:26 am

I had forgotten all about that. I wonder what the views are like from the top-level restaurant?

UrbanSG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 1848
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 8:55 am

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#527 Post by UrbanSG » Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:48 am

The views are amazing, show off out changing southern skyline well. Check out their website, there is a poor quality photo where you get a glimpse of the view, looks good even in that shot.

User avatar
joshzxzx
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 273
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 1:17 pm

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#528 Post by joshzxzx » Fri Jul 11, 2008 9:21 am

Image[/quote]

Does anyone have any renders of how this development will look once completed?
South Australia the Festival State

User avatar
jk1237
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 1756
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:22 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#529 Post by jk1237 » Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:00 am

AtD wrote:Thanks for the scoop, Urban.
Will wrote:On August 29 [2006], an application was lodged with the council for a 7 level addition to the Rydges South Park hotel on the corner of South and West Terrace. The proposed addition will include more car-parks as well as conference facilites. The project is estimated to cost $4.86 million and it has been designated category 2 by the council.
I beg your pardon, a 7 level addition? What, when, who, where, how?

I had no idea about this, sounds great. And the drive up Anzac Highway towards West Tce will look like a big city in the distance. :D

Similar to the old John Martins carpark, I only thought building structures were designed to take their own weight, how do they do this. Any engineers around?

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7577
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#530 Post by Ben » Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:03 am

jk1237 wrote:
AtD wrote:Thanks for the scoop, Urban.
Will wrote:On August 29 [2006], an application was lodged with the council for a 7 level addition to the Rydges South Park hotel on the corner of South and West Terrace. The proposed addition will include more car-parks as well as conference facilites. The project is estimated to cost $4.86 million and it has been designated category 2 by the council.
I beg your pardon, a 7 level addition? What, when, who, where, how?

I had no idea about this, sounds great. And the drive up Anzac Highway towards West Tce will look like a big city in the distance. :D

Similar to the old John Martins carpark, I only thought building structures were designed to take their own weight, how do they do this. Any engineers around?
it's a rear addition so it will not involve an increase in overall height of the building as it is already 7 levels :)

User avatar
jk1237
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 1756
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:22 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#531 Post by jk1237 » Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:10 am

ah bugger :oops:

User avatar
wilkiebarkid
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 601
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:19 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#532 Post by wilkiebarkid » Sun Jul 13, 2008 7:19 pm

EAST is well under way with a fair bit of activity in the last week or so.

Image

Image

Image

User avatar
Shuz
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2538
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Glandore

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#533 Post by Shuz » Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:44 pm

Wheres that at?

User avatar
wilkiebarkid
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 601
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:19 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#534 Post by wilkiebarkid » Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:48 pm

Shuz wrote:Wheres that at?
Corner of Hutt Street and Angas Street.

User avatar
jk1237
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 1756
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:22 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#535 Post by jk1237 » Sun Jul 13, 2008 9:48 pm

bit of a waste for that prime piece of land. should be atleast double the height, however I think Hutt street is as bad as North Adl for height limits :roll:

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#536 Post by monotonehell » Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:16 pm

jk1237 wrote:bit of a waste for that prime piece of land. should be atleast double the height, however I think Hutt street is as bad as North Adl for height limits :roll:
I disagree, Hutt street is quite rightly kept at a medium height level. It's mostly residential in nature and intent. That side of the city should be kept low profile and relaxed a little, while the power buildings can go up along the KWS and CBD areas. A better skyline will be seen if we concentrate the taller buildings somewhat. Leaving it open for tall buildings everywhere will just mean a pancake with a few pricks sticking up from it. It's all about contrast and harmony.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

mgb
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 12:52 pm

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#537 Post by mgb » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:02 am

Will wrote:I have found an image of the proposed community housing development that will be constructed on Whitmore Square. The building being developed by the ACC, will contain 27 residential apartments and retail at gound level. The building is expected to be complete by August 2008.

Image
I was heading past the corner of Whitmore Sq & Sturt Street yesterday (South East side) and noticed they had started digging on this site. Looks like a very big hole at the moment. Has there been any updates on what will go up on this site?

mattblack
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1108
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 11:20 am

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#538 Post by mattblack » Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:43 am

The building is expected to be complete by August 2008.
WOW !! :D

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5869
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#539 Post by Will » Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:29 pm

Will wrote:A development application was lodged with the ACC for the following:

Demolish existing buildings and construct 5 level residential buildings featuring 26 apartments and ground floor car-parking. The development is located at 125-131 Sturt Street, and has been classified as being Category 2.
This development will come before the ACC DAP next week, and it is expected to receive planning APPROVAL.



North perspective:

Image


North-east perspective:

Image

Southern perspective:

Image

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5869
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#540 Post by Will » Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:40 pm

Will wrote:The development application to build an 8 level building at 121-123 South Terrace comes before the ACC next Monday. However as this is a non-complying development, at this stage the ACC will only decide whether to continue with its assessment process. If the council decides to continue with its assessment process, the development will become a Category 3 development application.

The building is 8 levels in total, and will be a mixed use development, including the first four levels as office accomodation with the top 4 floors containing 10 residential apartments. The building will have an underground carpark. The building's main violation is that at a towering 26.9m, it exceeds the height restriction of 21m.

Here is an image of the development:

Image

This development will come before the ACC DAP next Monday. It is expected that it will be REJECTED.

The reasons for the rejection are as follows:

*At 26.3m, it exceeds the 21m height restriction by 5.3m

*The incorporation of 4 levels of office accomodation are thought to be at variance with the residential character of the locality

*The building does not incorporate a narrow band of landscaping on its South Terrace frontage

*The building has a shortfall of 13 carparks

*The building exceeds the plot ratio count (5.3 compared to the maximum allowed 1.5)

*The building exceeds the dwelling unit factor by 2 apartments

*The building does not contain the required 20% landscaped open space

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests