[U/C] M2 North-South Motorway
- shiftaling
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 12:49 am
- Location: Modbury
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
I feel more sorry for the ones on the other side of York who won't be moving! That is going to be a very noisy area for a long time
- ChillyPhilly
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2764
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: Kaurna Land.
- Contact:
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
Our state, our city, our future.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
[U/C] Re: [U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
ChillyPhilly wrote:Link to the InDaily article: https://indaily.com.au/news/2021/07/07/ ... d-project/
-
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 7:23 pm
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
𝗧𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗗𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘁𝗼𝗻 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁
The Torrens to Darlington team have been out and about along South Road, gathering vital noise-level data to inform the planning and design phase of this project.
Noise monitors have been placed at selected locations along the project alignment, from West Hindmarsh to St Marys. They’re gathering critical baseline noise data, which will help us plan how the motorway will function and what we’ll do during construction.
Big thanks to those who’ve agreed to ‘host’ the monitors on their properties.
https://www.facebook.com/DFITSA/posts/172971924857555
The Torrens to Darlington team have been out and about along South Road, gathering vital noise-level data to inform the planning and design phase of this project.
Noise monitors have been placed at selected locations along the project alignment, from West Hindmarsh to St Marys. They’re gathering critical baseline noise data, which will help us plan how the motorway will function and what we’ll do during construction.
Big thanks to those who’ve agreed to ‘host’ the monitors on their properties.
https://www.facebook.com/DFITSA/posts/172971924857555
I Follow The Port Adelaide Football Club
https://www.facebook.com/IFollowThePAFC/
https://www.facebook.com/IFollowThePAFC/
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
What is the business case for spending 10 billion on the remaining stretch of road, other than saving users 10 minutes of travel time, what are the other benefits? Was there a business case ever presented? I can't seem to find one. Some sources point to a business case mid this year .
The more I consider this grandiose proposal, the more puzzled I become- 10 Billion is a insane amount of money, especially for a economy the size of ours.
The more I consider this grandiose proposal, the more puzzled I become- 10 Billion is a insane amount of money, especially for a economy the size of ours.
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
Freight and commercial traffic heading North/South through Adelaide is already and would increasingly be bottlenecked by the fact it's trying to move through what is in many ways a suburban road.omada wrote: ↑Fri Jul 16, 2021 7:56 amWhat is the business case for spending 10 billion on the remaining stretch of road, other than saving users 10 minutes of travel time, what are the other benefits? Was there a business case ever presented? I can't seem to find one. Some sources point to a business case mid this year .
The more I consider this grandiose proposal, the more puzzled I become- 10 Billion is a insane amount of money, especially for a economy the size of ours.
Plus most of the rest of the road has been built, any party which chose to abandon plans to complete it now would be out of power for a generation.
- ChillyPhilly
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2764
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: Kaurna Land.
- Contact:
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
What is the economic, financial, environmental and social cost for not building it?
Probably higher than $10b.
It is important that the design is correct - or else it will not achieve its objectives, and the massive expenditure will not be justified.
In principle, I would much rather see $10b spent on public transport, cycling and pedestrian infrastructure. Imagine how much our city could be positively transformed with this.
Probably higher than $10b.
It is important that the design is correct - or else it will not achieve its objectives, and the massive expenditure will not be justified.
In principle, I would much rather see $10b spent on public transport, cycling and pedestrian infrastructure. Imagine how much our city could be positively transformed with this.
Our state, our city, our future.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
And then you will still need the motorway, because it has to be said yet again-this motorway is not being built for the benefit of suburban commuters (although they will by default benefit from it), but commerce, and the growth of the transport and logistics industry is showing no signs of slowing down any time soon.ChillyPhilly wrote: ↑Fri Jul 16, 2021 8:36 amIn principle, I would much rather see $10b spent on public transport, cycling and pedestrian infrastructure. Imagine how much our city could be positively transformed with this.
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
What proportion of traffic coming into Darlington on the Southern Expressway is commerce rather than commuter?claybro wrote: ↑Fri Jul 16, 2021 5:05 pmAnd then you will still need the motorway, because it has to be said yet again-this motorway is not being built for the benefit of suburban commuters (although they will by default benefit from it), but commerce, and the growth of the transport and logistics industry is showing no signs of slowing down any time soon.ChillyPhilly wrote: ↑Fri Jul 16, 2021 8:36 amIn principle, I would much rather see $10b spent on public transport, cycling and pedestrian infrastructure. Imagine how much our city could be positively transformed with this.
- ChillyPhilly
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2764
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: Kaurna Land.
- Contact:
[U/C] Re: [U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
I know, but it was the principle.claybro wrote:And then you will still need the motorway, because it has to be said yet again-this motorway is not being built for the benefit of suburban commuters (although they will by default benefit from it), but commerce, and the growth of the transport and logistics industry is showing no signs of slowing down any time soon.ChillyPhilly wrote: ↑Fri Jul 16, 2021 8:36 amIn principle, I would much rather see $10b spent on public transport, cycling and pedestrian infrastructure. Imagine how much our city could be positively transformed with this.
Our state, our city, our future.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
Picking a segment - the section under Secombe Road from https://data.sa.gov.au/data/dataset/traffic-volumes :PD2/20 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 16, 2021 10:42 pmWhat proportion of traffic coming into Darlington on the Southern Expressway is commerce rather than commuter?claybro wrote: ↑Fri Jul 16, 2021 5:05 pmAnd then you will still need the motorway, because it has to be said yet again-this motorway is not being built for the benefit of suburban commuters (although they will by default benefit from it), but commerce, and the growth of the transport and logistics industry is showing no signs of slowing down any time soon.ChillyPhilly wrote: ↑Fri Jul 16, 2021 8:36 amIn principle, I would much rather see $10b spent on public transport, cycling and pedestrian infrastructure. Imagine how much our city could be positively transformed with this.
Road No 06780
Tesecn Start Rrd 2.96
Tesecn End Rrd 8.97
Tesecn Volume 65800
Tesecn Base Year 2019
Cv Percent 8
Number Cvs 5100
Class3to5 4000
Class6to9 920
Class10 220
Class11 0
So the answer to your question appears to be 8 percent of the traffic is commercial vehicles - over 5000 per day. The raw numbers represent number of vehicles per years divided by number of days, so an average daily flow (both ways) over a full year. Checking the segment of South Road past the Tonsley Hotel also shows 8%, but on lower total volume it is only 3600 commercial vehicles.
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
And then you will still need the motorway, because it has to be said yet again-this motorway is not being built for the benefit of suburban commuters (although they will by default benefit from it), but commerce, and the growth of the transport and logistics industry is showing no signs of slowing down any time soon.SBD wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 9:24 pm[quote=PD2/20 post_id=200274 time=<a href="tel:1626441120">1626441120</a> user_id=6224]
[quote=claybro post_id=200263 time=<a href="tel:1626420919">1626420919</a> user_id=5463]
[quote=ChillyPhilly post_id=200254 time=<a href="tel:1626390401">1626390401</a> user_id=1971]
In principle, I would much rather see $10b spent on public transport, cycling and pedestrian infrastructure. Imagine how much our city could be positively transformed with this.
[/quote]
What proportion of traffic coming into Darlington on the Southern Expressway is commerce rather than commuter?
[/quote]
Picking a segment - the section under Secombe Road from https://data.sa.gov.au/data/dataset/traffic-volumes :
Road No 06780
Tesecn Start Rrd 2.96
Tesecn End Rrd 8.97
Tesecn Volume 65800
Tesecn Base Year 2019
Cv Percent 8
Number Cvs 5100
Class3to5 4000
Class6to9 920
Class10 220
Class11 0
So the answer to your question appears to be 8 percent of the traffic is commercial vehicles - over 5000 per day. The raw numbers represent number of vehicles per years divided by number of days, so an average daily flow (both ways) over a full year. Checking the segment of South Road past the Tonsley Hotel also shows 8%, but on lower total volume it is only 3600 commercial vehicles.
[/quote]
The numbers you have provided do not relate the the central more commercial section, and also do not relate to the section that is about to have 10 billion spent on it. The southern expressway and indeedDarlington were very definitely provided for mainly commuter traffic, so the 8% figure is not necessarily relevant.
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
What proportion of traffic coming into Darlington on the Southern Expressway is commerce rather than commuter?claybro wrote: ↑Sun Jul 18, 2021 3:40 pmAnd then you will still need the motorway, because it has to be said yet again-this motorway is not being built for the benefit of suburban commuters (although they will by default benefit from it), but commerce, and the growth of the transport and logistics industry is showing no signs of slowing down any time soon.SBD wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 9:24 pm[quote=PD2/20 post_id=200274 time=<a href="tel:1626441120">1626441120</a> user_id=6224]
[quote=claybro post_id=200263 time=<a href="tel:1626420919">1626420919</a> user_id=5463]
[quote=ChillyPhilly post_id=200254 time=<a href="tel:1626390401">1626390401</a> user_id=1971]
In principle, I would much rather see $10b spent on public transport, cycling and pedestrian infrastructure. Imagine how much our city could be positively transformed with this.
[/quote]
Picking a segment - the section under Secombe Road from https://data.sa.gov.au/data/dataset/traffic-volumes :
Road No 06780
Tesecn Start Rrd 2.96
Tesecn End Rrd 8.97
Tesecn Volume 65800
Tesecn Base Year 2019
Cv Percent 8
Number Cvs 5100
Class3to5 4000
Class6to9 920
Class10 220
Class11 0
So the answer to your question appears to be 8 percent of the traffic is commercial vehicles - over 5000 per day. The raw numbers represent number of vehicles per years divided by number of days, so an average daily flow (both ways) over a full year. Checking the segment of South Road past the Tonsley Hotel also shows 8%, but on lower total volume it is only 3600 commercial vehicles.
[/quote]
The numbers you have provided do not relate the the central more commercial section, and also do not relate to the section that is about to have 10 billion spent on it. The southern expressway and indeedDarlington were very definitely provided for mainly commuter traffic, so the 8% figure is not necessarily relevant.
[/quote]
8 percent related to the section of the Southern Expressway south of the Darlington interchange, as the question was "... traffic coming into Darlington on the Southern Expressway...".
I found it confusing to work out which lines to pick on the map through the area of the recent Darlington upgrade. Some of them were as low as 4%. I think the one for traffic through the lowered motorway is 8.5% I was surprised to notice that the section of South Road between Sir Donald Bradman Drive and Henley Beach Road was a higher proportion, showing 11.5% of all vehicles (5000 per day) are commercial vehicles. I don't think they have total journey data to show how many are the same commercial vehicles continuing their journey.
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
I've done another drive-through video of the Regency to Pym section of the North-South Motorway. Any feedback is appreciated as always.
https://youtu.be/5uCYPVGbe78
https://youtu.be/5uCYPVGbe78
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
Great video Norman.
There are 2 signs that confuse me when I drive through this section.
Northbound - there is a small sign showing which South Rd lane goes where just before you head over the Regency Rd bridge (0:43 in Norman's vid). It is placed so close to the motorway, one could be mistaken for thinking this sign is for motorway traffic, not the intersection under the bridge.
Southbound - the old exit sign from South Rd to Torrens Rd is still there even though you cant exit the motorway at that point anymore (2:28 in Norman's vid).
There are 2 signs that confuse me when I drive through this section.
Northbound - there is a small sign showing which South Rd lane goes where just before you head over the Regency Rd bridge (0:43 in Norman's vid). It is placed so close to the motorway, one could be mistaken for thinking this sign is for motorway traffic, not the intersection under the bridge.
Southbound - the old exit sign from South Rd to Torrens Rd is still there even though you cant exit the motorway at that point anymore (2:28 in Norman's vid).
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Algernon and 0 guests