Page 352 of 425
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2021 1:11 pm
by shiftaling
I feel more sorry for the ones on the other side of York who won't be moving! That is going to be a very noisy area for a long time
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2021 1:16 pm
by ChillyPhilly
[U/C] Re: [U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2021 3:34 pm
by Verbatim9
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2021 3:47 pm
by I Follow PAFC
๐ง๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐ผ ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐๐ผ๐ป ๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ท๐ฒ๐ฐ๐
The Torrens to Darlington team have been out and about along South Road, gathering vital noise-level data to inform the planning and design phase of this project.
Noise monitors have been placed at selected locations along the project alignment, from West Hindmarsh to St Marys. Theyโre gathering critical baseline noise data, which will help us plan how the motorway will function and what weโll do during construction.
Big thanks to those whoโve agreed to โhostโ the monitors on their properties.
https://www.facebook.com/DFITSA/posts/172971924857555
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 7:56 am
by omada
What is the business case for spending 10 billion on the remaining stretch of road, other than saving users 10 minutes of travel time, what are the other benefits? Was there a business case ever presented? I can't seem to find one. Some sources point to a business case mid this year .
The more I consider this grandiose proposal, the more puzzled I become- 10 Billion is a insane amount of money, especially for a economy the size of ours.
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 8:30 am
by Nort
omada wrote: โFri Jul 16, 2021 7:56 am
What is the business case for spending 10 billion on the remaining stretch of road, other than saving users 10 minutes of travel time, what are the other benefits? Was there a business case ever presented? I can't seem to find one. Some sources point to a business case mid this year .
The more I consider this grandiose proposal, the more puzzled I become- 10 Billion is a insane amount of money, especially for a economy the size of ours.
Freight and commercial traffic heading North/South through Adelaide is already and would increasingly be bottlenecked by the fact it's trying to move through what is in many ways a suburban road.
Plus most of the rest of the road has been built, any party which chose to abandon plans to complete it now would be out of power for a generation.
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 8:36 am
by ChillyPhilly
What is the economic, financial, environmental and social cost for not building it?
Probably higher than $10b.
It is important that the design is correct - or else it will not achieve its objectives, and the massive expenditure will not be justified.
In principle, I would much rather see $10b spent on public transport, cycling and pedestrian infrastructure. Imagine how much our city could be positively transformed with this.
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 5:05 pm
by claybro
ChillyPhilly wrote: โFri Jul 16, 2021 8:36 am
In principle, I would much rather see $10b spent on public transport, cycling and pedestrian infrastructure. Imagine how much our city could be positively transformed with this.
And then you will still need the motorway, because it has to be said yet again-this motorway is not being built for the benefit of suburban commuters (although they will by default benefit from it), but commerce, and the growth of the transport and logistics industry is showing no signs of slowing down any time soon.
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 10:42 pm
by PD2/20
claybro wrote: โFri Jul 16, 2021 5:05 pm
ChillyPhilly wrote: โFri Jul 16, 2021 8:36 am
In principle, I would much rather see $10b spent on public transport, cycling and pedestrian infrastructure. Imagine how much our city could be positively transformed with this.
And then you will still need the motorway, because it has to be said yet again-this motorway is not being built for the benefit of suburban commuters (although they will by default benefit from it), but commerce, and the growth of the transport and logistics industry is showing no signs of slowing down any time soon.
What proportion of traffic coming into Darlington on the Southern Expressway is commerce rather than commuter?
[U/C] Re: [U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 11:22 pm
by ChillyPhilly
claybro wrote:ChillyPhilly wrote: โFri Jul 16, 2021 8:36 am
In principle, I would much rather see $10b spent on public transport, cycling and pedestrian infrastructure. Imagine how much our city could be positively transformed with this.
And then you will still need the motorway, because it has to be said yet again-this motorway is not being built for the benefit of suburban commuters (although they will by default benefit from it), but commerce, and the growth of the transport and logistics industry is showing no signs of slowing down any time soon.
I know, but it was the principle.
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2021 9:24 pm
by SBD
PD2/20 wrote: โFri Jul 16, 2021 10:42 pm
claybro wrote: โFri Jul 16, 2021 5:05 pm
ChillyPhilly wrote: โFri Jul 16, 2021 8:36 am
In principle, I would much rather see $10b spent on public transport, cycling and pedestrian infrastructure. Imagine how much our city could be positively transformed with this.
And then you will still need the motorway, because it has to be said yet again-this motorway is not being built for the benefit of suburban commuters (although they will by default benefit from it), but commerce, and the growth of the transport and logistics industry is showing no signs of slowing down any time soon.
What proportion of traffic coming into Darlington on the Southern Expressway is commerce rather than commuter?
Picking a segment - the section under Secombe Road from
https://data.sa.gov.au/data/dataset/traffic-volumes :
Road No 06780
Tesecn Start Rrd 2.96
Tesecn End Rrd 8.97
Tesecn Volume 65800
Tesecn Base Year 2019
Cv Percent 8
Number Cvs 5100
Class3to5 4000
Class6to9 920
Class10 220
Class11 0
So the answer to your question appears to be 8 percent of the traffic is commercial vehicles - over 5000 per day. The raw numbers represent number of vehicles per years divided by number of days, so an average daily flow (both ways) over a full year. Checking the segment of South Road past the Tonsley Hotel also shows 8%, but on lower total volume it is only 3600 commercial vehicles.
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2021 3:40 pm
by claybro
SBD wrote: โSat Jul 17, 2021 9:24 pm
[quote=PD2/20 post_id=200274 time=<a href="tel:1626441120">1626441120</a> user_id=6224]
[quote=claybro post_id=200263 time=<a href="tel:1626420919">1626420919</a> user_id=5463]
[quote=ChillyPhilly post_id=200254 time=<a href="tel:1626390401">1626390401</a> user_id=1971]
In principle, I would much rather see $10b spent on public transport, cycling and pedestrian infrastructure. Imagine how much our city could be positively transformed with this.
And then you will still need the motorway, because it has to be said yet again-this motorway is not being built for the benefit of suburban commuters (although they will by default benefit from it), but commerce, and the growth of the transport and logistics industry is showing no signs of slowing down any time soon.
[/quote]
What proportion of traffic coming into Darlington on the Southern Expressway is commerce rather than commuter?
[/quote]
Picking a segment - the section under Secombe Road from
https://data.sa.gov.au/data/dataset/traffic-volumes :
Road No 06780
Tesecn Start Rrd 2.96
Tesecn End Rrd 8.97
Tesecn Volume 65800
Tesecn Base Year 2019
Cv Percent 8
Number Cvs 5100
Class3to5 4000
Class6to9 920
Class10 220
Class11 0
So the answer to your question appears to be 8 percent of the traffic is commercial vehicles - over 5000 per day. The raw numbers represent number of vehicles per years divided by number of days, so an average daily flow (both ways) over a full year. Checking the segment of South Road past the Tonsley Hotel also shows 8%, but on lower total volume it is only 3600 commercial vehicles.
[/quote]
The numbers you have provided do not relate the the central more commercial section, and also do not relate to the section that is about to have 10 billion spent on it. The southern expressway and indeedDarlington were very definitely provided for mainly commuter traffic, so the 8% figure is not necessarily relevant.
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2021 5:11 pm
by SBD
claybro wrote: โSun Jul 18, 2021 3:40 pm
SBD wrote: โSat Jul 17, 2021 9:24 pm
[quote=PD2/20 post_id=200274 time=<a href="tel:1626441120">1626441120</a> user_id=6224]
[quote=claybro post_id=200263 time=<a href="tel:1626420919">1626420919</a> user_id=5463]
[quote=ChillyPhilly post_id=200254 time=<a href="tel:1626390401">1626390401</a> user_id=1971]
In principle, I would much rather see $10b spent on public transport, cycling and pedestrian infrastructure. Imagine how much our city could be positively transformed with this.
And then you will still need the motorway, because it has to be said yet again-this motorway is not being built for the benefit of suburban commuters (although they will by default benefit from it), but commerce, and the growth of the transport and logistics industry is showing no signs of slowing down any time soon.
What proportion of traffic coming into Darlington on the Southern Expressway is commerce rather than commuter?
[/quote]
Picking a segment - the section under Secombe Road from
https://data.sa.gov.au/data/dataset/traffic-volumes :
Road No 06780
Tesecn Start Rrd 2.96
Tesecn End Rrd 8.97
Tesecn Volume 65800
Tesecn Base Year 2019
Cv Percent 8
Number Cvs 5100
Class3to5 4000
Class6to9 920
Class10 220
Class11 0
So the answer to your question appears to be 8 percent of the traffic is commercial vehicles - over 5000 per day. The raw numbers represent number of vehicles per years divided by number of days, so an average daily flow (both ways) over a full year. Checking the segment of South Road past the Tonsley Hotel also shows 8%, but on lower total volume it is only 3600 commercial vehicles.
[/quote]
The numbers you have provided do not relate the the central more commercial section, and also do not relate to the section that is about to have 10 billion spent on it. The southern expressway and indeedDarlington were very definitely provided for mainly commuter traffic, so the 8% figure is not necessarily relevant.
[/quote]
8 percent related to the section of the Southern Expressway south of the Darlington interchange, as the question was "... traffic coming into Darlington on the Southern Expressway...".
I found it confusing to work out which lines to pick on the map through the area of the recent Darlington upgrade. Some of them were as low as 4%. I
think the one for traffic through the lowered motorway is 8.5% I was surprised to notice that the section of South Road between Sir Donald Bradman Drive and Henley Beach Road was a higher proportion, showing 11.5% of all vehicles (5000 per day) are commercial vehicles. I don't think they have total journey data to show how many are the
same commercial vehicles continuing their journey.
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2021 6:01 pm
by Norman
I've done another drive-through video of the Regency to Pym section of the North-South Motorway. Any feedback is appreciated as always.
https://youtu.be/5uCYPVGbe78
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2021 5:59 am
by rogue
Great video Norman.
There are 2 signs that confuse me when I drive through this section.
Northbound - there is a small sign showing which South Rd lane goes where just before you head over the Regency Rd bridge (0:43 in Norman's vid). It is placed so close to the motorway, one could be mistaken for thinking this sign is for motorway traffic, not the intersection under the bridge.
Southbound - the old exit sign from South Rd to Torrens Rd is still there even though you cant exit the motorway at that point anymore (2:28 in Norman's vid).
