Finally, an end to Le Cornu site feud
CON Makris will start construction at the controversial former Le Cornu site on O'Connell St early next year, bringing to an end a bitter and drawn-out feud with the Adelaide City Council.
But the man who is arguably the state's largest property developer has said he is unlikely to spend another dollar within the Adelaide CBD, saying "life is too short" to deal with the intransigent and, he says, "conflicted" council.
The council has often been criticised for standing in the way of development, with the Le Cornu site, the now-shelved plan to redevelop the Victoria Park Race Course, and the stagnant state of Victoria Square cited by critics as examples.
Mr Makris, whose family interests are reportedly worth more than $1 billion, said it was "his dream" to develop the site, which has been vacant since 1989.
His original dream, to build a seven-storey residential and commercial project, including a prestige seven-star boutique hotel, was never officially lodged with the council, but faced strong opposition, especially from Councillor Anne Moran.
The proposed development, which was later revised to a nine-storey project, breached the council's height restrictions for the area, which limit building heights to three storeys.
The State Government stepped in, awarding the proposal major project status in May 2007, and final approval in September last year.
Mr Makris has now assembled a team of consultants to make his dream come true, including Synergy Project Management, Ignite, Bestec, Wallbridge & Gilbert, Rider Levett Bucknall, Brock Real Estate and Toop & Toop.
"When this is finished, it's going to become the focus of Adelaide," he said. "I want to give something to this beautiful city where I live."
It will be the last development he does in the city, however.
"I haven't got time. Life is so precious, and I haven't got the time to argue with . . . people that have got no idea," Mr Makris said.
"A developer wants to spend millions of dollars to make something fantastic. These people, they try to stop it."
The $150 million, six-storey project will include 47 residential apartments, retail outlets, cafes and a pedestrian piazza. There will be 381 car parking spaces, and 350 new full-time, part-time and casual jobs will be created.
Mr Makris is not the only high-profile developer who has a gripe with the council.
Earlier this year Theo Maras called for the council to be sacked, saying it lacked leadership and was not making decisions that were in the broader interests of the state.
Former council chief executive Stuart Moseley also called for a review of how the council was elected, floating the idea of allowing city workers to vote. A frustrated State Government stepped in last July, stripping the council of planning powers for projects costing more than $10 million, and handing them to the Development Assessment Commission.
On Thursday night, the DAC approved plans for a 13-storey office block on Light Square.
The decision came just a fortnight after the council's development authority branded the building too tall for the precinct and voted against the plans.
Mr Makris this week directed a vitriolic broadside at the council, singling out Ms Moran and Lord Mayor Michael Harbison for special criticism for standing in the way of developing the site he has owned since 2001.
The site has been vacant since 1989, after being sold by the Le Cornu furniture business theprevious year.
Ms Moran has been a vocal critic of Mr Makris's plans, once saying that granting the development major project status, which the State Government did in 2007, would be an act of "insanity".
Mr Makris this week hit back, expressing the opinion that Ms Moran was "the biggest liability Adelaide has at the moment".
"The way they (the council) have operated over the years, they are disgusting," he said.
"Those people should be in the country somewhere, Port Augusta, Orroroo or somewhere."
Mr Makris expressed concern about Mr Harbison, saying because he had business interests in the city's east end, this could colour his attitude towards any major development in North Adelaide.
Ms Moran yesterday denied she was anti-development, saying she had voted to approve developments on the site every time it came to the council under the previous owners.
She pointed out that Mr Makris's plan had never been formally presented to the council. However, she would have voted against it because it was so far outside the area's development guidelines.
"He got it pretty cheaply, he got it knowing the rules," she said.
Ms Moran said the council consulted the community about the development guidelines for North Adelaide and there was an overwhelming response to maintain height restrictions. Mr Harbison yesterday declined to comment.
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/stor ... 01,00.html