Page 5 of 55

[CAN]

Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 6:47 pm
by supernova
the minerals boom will attract more people here. everything looks good for our future.

[CAN]

Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 5:04 am
by crawf
wow - SA already has 1.6 million people

FANTASTIC

[CAN]

Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:11 pm
by AG
SA has had a population around 1.5 to 1.6 million for over a decade as a result of the sluggish population growth.

[CAN]

Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:51 pm
by Pikey
Anyhow, back on topic....

W should expect to see the marketing for this tower real soon, according to that PDF.

[CAN]

Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 4:13 pm
by Will
AG wrote:SA has had a population around 1.5 to 1.6 million for over a decade as a result of the sluggish population growth.
No it hasn't, SA reached 1.5 million only in 2001.

[CAN]

Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:05 pm
by Scott
Does anyone know what the status of this project is???

[CAN]

Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:19 pm
by Ben
Going to market in September construction due to start From November '06.

[CAN]

Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:33 pm
by Scott
thanks Beamer

[CAN]

Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:27 pm
by Ben
Spire has been approved at 33lv 105m.

Construction due to Start Q1 2007 and finished by Q3 2008. Estimated construction time is 22 months. More info coming soon.

Latest report:

http://inproperty.com/pdfs/spir_property_report.pdf

[CAN]

Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:51 pm
by Howie
beamer85 wrote:Spire has been approved at 33lv 105m.
Nice.. wonder how they snuck that one through. I'll update the thread title.

[CAN]

Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:00 pm
by Done
The past two days have been great! We get the spire on CC1 and now Spire Living is 105m! YES :D:D

[CAN]

Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 7:46 pm
by Will
beamer85 wrote:Spire has been approved at 33lv 105m.

Construction due to Start Q1 2007 and finished by Q3 2008. Estimated construction time is 22 months. More info coming soon.

Latest report:

http://inproperty.com/pdfs/spir_property_report.pdf
For a building to have a height increase the developers have to lodge a new development application which needs to be voted upon by council.

In regard to this building, no such application has been lodged or voted upon by council.

So as far as we should be concerned, the building is still 91.9m to top of roof and 97.9m to top of structure.

[CAN]

Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 10:40 pm
by Ho Really
beamer85 wrote:Spire has been approved at 33lv 105m.
...and
Will wrote:So as far as we should be concerned, the building is still 91.9m to top of roof and 97.9m to top of structure.
I have seen side elevations of Spire (Bentham Apartments) and can confirm the 33 levels. Not sure about the final height though, but if it's going to be 105 metres, that would make it the second tallest building in our CBD.

Interesting website...cheers fellas.

[CAN]

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 8:52 am
by Ben
Will wrote:
beamer85 wrote:Spire has been approved at 33lv 105m.

Construction due to Start Q1 2007 and finished by Q3 2008. Estimated construction time is 22 months. More info coming soon.

Latest report:

http://inproperty.com/pdfs/spir_property_report.pdf
For a building to have a height increase the developers have to lodge a new development application which needs to be voted upon by council.

In regard to this building, no such application has been lodged or voted upon by council.

So as far as we should be concerned, the building is still 91.9m to top of roof and 97.9m to top of structure.
This information came direct from the developer yesterday and said this had actually been confirmed a long time ago but was unable to be released until just recently. He also said that at this late stage it is extremley unlikely the detials will change.

If you are still unhappy with this I suggest you do some research yourself.

[CAN]

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 11:37 am
by Will
beamer85 wrote:
Will wrote:
beamer85 wrote:Spire has been approved at 33lv 105m.

Construction due to Start Q1 2007 and finished by Q3 2008. Estimated construction time is 22 months. More info coming soon.

Latest report:

http://inproperty.com/pdfs/spir_property_report.pdf
For a building to have a height increase the developers have to lodge a new development application which needs to be voted upon by council.

In regard to this building, no such application has been lodged or voted upon by council.

So as far as we should be concerned, the building is still 91.9m to top of roof and 97.9m to top of structure.
This information came direct from the developer yesterday and said this had actually been confirmed a long time ago but was unable to be released until just recently. He also said that at this late stage it is extremley unlikely the detials will change.

If you are still unhappy with this I suggest you do some research yourself.
I have done my research, and the simple fact is that the council has not voted or even received an application on increasing the height of the building from 97.9m to 105m.

Unless this is another surprise like the spire on CCT1? However I find this unlikely because late last year the 107m proposal was denied planning approval because of the airport, and the fears that planes would crash into the building.

With this post I would also like to clarify something. This is not a personal attack on yourself, and I am not disputing your conversation with the developer. My issue is that we cannot claim that this building is approved at 105m without having evidence from a source like the ACC stating that the building has planning approval for 105m.