Re: SA State Election 2022
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2022 4:20 pm
One delicious morsel of this electoral smorgasbord is that nobody’s favourite councillor Alexander Hyde looks to have failed in the traditional Liberal sinecure of Waite.
Adelaide's Premier Development and Construction Site
https://mail.sensational-adelaide.com/forum/
https://mail.sensational-adelaide.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7261
One can only hope he backs it up with another loss at November’s council elections.gnrc_louis wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 4:29 pmSuch great news for the State! Hope for the sake of SA, he is never Liberal leader.
I think it's a good policy, but will likely be something for a second term.
I think it would be good to have tram extension plans moving through InfrastructureSA though, in case either of the federal parties wants to throw some money at something for the coming federal election (perhaps the issues around oil might push them to consider public transport investment as part of a response.)
Lets hope that Mali doesn’t get any ideas from Jay Weatherill in terms of keeping the
With what money though? With the extraordinary amount of money being spent on health, there will only be a trickle left to go towards infrastructure and other economy-growing projects and initiatives.rev wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 7:05 pmAgreed with Nathan, they shouldn't wait to use it for a second term bid, they should get the ball rolling ASAP.
No reason other then politics why they can't have the first stages of a wider network U/C by the time the next state election comes around.
They also need to get a move on and look at how to connect the NSM with the SEF.
Maybe take it a step further and look at creating a proper motorway ring route.
Federal moneyA-Town wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 9:11 pmWith what money though? With the extraordinary amount of money being spent on health, there will only be a trickle left to go towards infrastructure and other economy-growing projects and initiatives.rev wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 7:05 pmAgreed with Nathan, they shouldn't wait to use it for a second term bid, they should get the ball rolling ASAP.
No reason other then politics why they can't have the first stages of a wider network U/C by the time the next state election comes around.
They also need to get a move on and look at how to connect the NSM with the SEF.
Maybe take it a step further and look at creating a proper motorway ring route.
Yes! In fact, thanks to the Federal funding, you and my tax money, we will all pay for the light rail network. Taxes should go to useful things such as effective road and public transport infrastructure. The difference between a basketball stadium and a tram network is that a tram network eases congestion off the road and increases commute and access to urban centres. Basketball stadiums don't do that ghs. They are basketball stadiums. They are big and don't move or increase efficiency. ghs, did you know that basketball stadiums aren't considered infrastructure for this reason? It would be a waste of money making a basketball stadium with wheels to consider it as infrastructure as well. That's why it doesn't happen. It's the difference between a waste of money and a good investment.
Federal funding, borrowing/debt.A-Town wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 9:11 pmWith what money though? With the extraordinary amount of money being spent on health, there will only be a trickle left to go towards infrastructure and other economy-growing projects and initiatives.rev wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 7:05 pmAgreed with Nathan, they shouldn't wait to use it for a second term bid, they should get the ball rolling ASAP.
No reason other then politics why they can't have the first stages of a wider network U/C by the time the next state election comes around.
They also need to get a move on and look at how to connect the NSM with the SEF.
Maybe take it a step further and look at creating a proper motorway ring route.
Also, ghs and I will pay for it through our taxes. We are willing to pay for good investments.rev wrote: ↑Tue Mar 22, 2022 9:10 amFederal funding, borrowing/debt.A-Town wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 9:11 pmWith what money though? With the extraordinary amount of money being spent on health, there will only be a trickle left to go towards infrastructure and other economy-growing projects and initiatives.rev wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 7:05 pmAgreed with Nathan, they shouldn't wait to use it for a second term bid, they should get the ball rolling ASAP.
No reason other then politics why they can't have the first stages of a wider network U/C by the time the next state election comes around.
They also need to get a move on and look at how to connect the NSM with the SEF.
Maybe take it a step further and look at creating a proper motorway ring route.
It doesn't get paid for up front. If its going to take four years to build, it gets paid for across that time frame.
Our state debt to gsp ratio is relatively low still, so they can still borrow money especially to fund infrastructure, and our states credit rating isn't too bad either.
And, if we're short, perhaps politicians can take a pay cut, or live off a regular pension like rest of us will have to, instead of the $200,000 plus that politicians like Rob Lucas will get.