News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2790
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

#6271 Post by ChillyPhilly » Tue Jan 21, 2025 11:47 am

A super cool site showing every single rail line, light and heavy, of Australia (and NZ) from 1850 to 2025: https://railhistory.io/

You can slide along the timeline year by year. Quite sad when light rail and some passenger rail instantly vanish within a year.

Credit to the creator on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/MelbourneTrain ... ?rdt=59850
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

User avatar
Spotto
Legendary Member!
Posts: 768
Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 9:05 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

#6272 Post by Spotto » Tue Jan 21, 2025 3:55 pm

Asbestos removal works are scheduled on the old Rosewater Loop in the coming week.

Great to see that progress hasn’t stalled on the greenway conversion.
IMG_8200.png
IMG_8201.png

User avatar
baytram366
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 468
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:06 pm
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

#6273 Post by baytram366 » Thu Jan 23, 2025 8:21 am

I was under the impression that the greenway was shelved and that there was an albeit small possibility that it was going to be used for trains again. Guessing that thought bubble has been canned....
Baytram 366's Flickr:

www.flickr.com/photos/baytram366

claybro
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2446
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:16 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

#6274 Post by claybro » Thu Jan 23, 2025 7:39 pm

With the rapidly increasing population of the Port.. and employment opportunities around multiple points on the Gawler Line… any other city would have Port Dock and Mawson lakes connected. Especially given there is already a corridor.

User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2790
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

#6275 Post by ChillyPhilly » Thu Jan 23, 2025 8:01 pm

baytram366 wrote:I was under the impression that the greenway was shelved and that there was an albeit small possibility that it was going to be used for trains again. Guessing that thought bubble has been canned....
Different corridor I'd say. There is a more direct line between the Port and Dry Creek.
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6466
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

#6276 Post by rev » Thu Jan 23, 2025 9:53 pm

ChillyPhilly wrote:
Thu Jan 23, 2025 8:01 pm
baytram366 wrote:I was under the impression that the greenway was shelved and that there was an albeit small possibility that it was going to be used for trains again. Guessing that thought bubble has been canned....
Different corridor I'd say. There is a more direct line between the Port and Dry Creek.
Surely there's a route they can find from Port Dock to the former salt pans that are going to be home to about 30,000 odd people in the near future? Spur the Gawler line off near there as well and continue it north past Bolivar and Burton, to Virginia, Riverlea and Two Wells..that new line could spur off towards Angle Vale as well.
These are only going to be the fastest growing regions population wise in Adelaide in the coming decades, if they aren't already.

User avatar
Spotto
Legendary Member!
Posts: 768
Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 9:05 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

#6277 Post by Spotto » Thu Jan 23, 2025 11:27 pm

ChillyPhilly wrote:
Thu Jan 23, 2025 8:01 pm
baytram366 wrote:I was under the impression that the greenway was shelved and that there was an albeit small possibility that it was going to be used for trains again. Guessing that thought bubble has been canned....
Different corridor I'd say. There is a more direct line between the Port and Dry Creek.
True, cutting out the Rosewater Loop from a future rail link eliminates crossing Grand Junction Road, plus the loop would only realistically serve one very minor station on a route that borders almost exclusively industrial land and would have no other stations.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests