News & Discussion: O-Bahn

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2715
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn

#631 Post by Ho Really » Thu Jan 28, 2016 6:12 pm

The tunnel under the parklands is a waste of money and should be redirected at other PT projects or spent elsewhere where it is needed immediately. I have never been a fan of the O-Bahn. The accident yesterday is one reason. If it was on rail they would've had signals and other safety measures...not to mention the log jam of buses. It should be converted to light rail. My rant may come too late and if they go ahead with the tunnel I hope it will be converted to accept trams in future. However I would've preferred the trams to run along North Terrace to join up with the line to the Entertainment Centre and Glenelg. A logical extension from the Northeast to the Southwest and running along our cultural boulevard. Anyway, politicians don't have vision or think logically. All they are interested in is throwing away money for a handful of votes!

Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6488
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn

#632 Post by Norman » Thu Jan 28, 2016 8:16 pm

Ho Really wrote:The tunnel under the parklands is a waste of money and should be redirected at other PT projects or spent elsewhere where it is needed immediately. I have never been a fan of the O-Bahn. The accident yesterday is one reason. If it was on rail they would've had signals and other safety measures...not to mention the log jam of buses. It should be converted to light rail. My rant may come too late and if they go ahead with the tunnel I hope it will be converted to accept trams in future. However I would've preferred the trams to run along North Terrace to join up with the line to the Entertainment Centre and Glenelg. A logical extension from the Northeast to the Southwest and running along our cultural boulevard. Anyway, politicians don't have vision or think logically. All they are interested in is throwing away money for a handful of votes!

Cheers
To be fair...
1. This has only been the third accident on the line since it opened.
2. There was no log jam, the other buses used the local road network to bypass the accident.
3. Work has already started on the project.

User avatar
metro
Legendary Member!
Posts: 970
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn

#633 Post by metro » Thu Jan 28, 2016 8:58 pm

Norman wrote:To be fair...
1. This has only been the third accident on the line since it opened.
what about all the cars that find their way onto the tracks? those are accidents and end up bringing the city's only well used rapid transit line to a standstill, and they happen fairly regularly. :roll:

Goodsy
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1107
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:39 am

Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn

#634 Post by Goodsy » Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:06 pm

metro wrote:
Norman wrote:To be fair...
1. This has only been the third accident on the line since it opened.
what about all the cars that find their way onto the tracks? those are accidents and end up bringing the city's only well used rapid transit line to a standstill, and they happen fairly regularly. :roll:
Once every few years isn't regular, the Gawler line shuts down from the heat more often then people driving onto the O-Bahn

PD2/20
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 388
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 2:32 pm

Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn

#635 Post by PD2/20 » Thu Jan 28, 2016 10:18 pm

GoodSmackUp wrote: Once every few years isn't regular, the Gawler line shuts down from the heat more often then people driving onto the O-Bahn
What causes the shutdowns from heat, track, signalling, rolling stock, and how often? The concrete sleepered track should be far less prone to buckling than the old wooden sleepered track.

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn

#636 Post by monotonehell » Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:29 pm

metro wrote:
Norman wrote:To be fair...
1. This has only been the third accident on the line since it opened.
what about all the cars that find their way onto the tracks? those are accidents and end up bringing the city's only well used rapid transit line to a standstill, and they happen fairly regularly. :roll:
A closure of a section of the OBahn does not bring it to a standstill. Unlike the closure of a train line, the same vehicles route around the problem on street. Sure this results in delays, but what happens when a train line is closed? A fleet of buses are deployed to replace the entire line.

Also, what about cars that find their way onto train tracks?

Your arguments are invalid. ;)
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

Brucetiki
Legendary Member!
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:20 pm

Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn

#637 Post by Brucetiki » Sat Jan 30, 2016 11:20 pm

Norman wrote:
Ho Really wrote:The tunnel under the parklands is a waste of money and should be redirected at other PT projects or spent elsewhere where it is needed immediately. I have never been a fan of the O-Bahn. The accident yesterday is one reason. If it was on rail they would've had signals and other safety measures...not to mention the log jam of buses. It should be converted to light rail. My rant may come too late and if they go ahead with the tunnel I hope it will be converted to accept trams in future. However I would've preferred the trams to run along North Terrace to join up with the line to the Entertainment Centre and Glenelg. A logical extension from the Northeast to the Southwest and running along our cultural boulevard. Anyway, politicians don't have vision or think logically. All they are interested in is throwing away money for a handful of votes!

Cheers
To be fair...
1. This has only been the third accident on the line since it opened.
2. There was no log jam, the other buses used the local road network to bypass the accident.
3. Work has already started on the project.
And to add it is highly likely the accident the other day was driver error. How fast was he driving for him to a) ram into another bus in the first place and b) ram into a bus at considerable speed.

User avatar
The Scooter Guy
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1666
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 7:45 pm
Location: Anywhere!
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn

#638 Post by The Scooter Guy » Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:46 am

metro wrote:
Norman wrote:To be fair...
1. This has only been the third accident on the line since it opened.
what about all the cars that find their way onto the tracks? those are accidents and end up bringing the city's only well used rapid transit line to a standstill, and they happen fairly regularly. :roll:
And what would happen if a tyre or guide wheel were to disintegrate whilst going at 90km/h?
For starters, my avatar is the well-known Adelaide Aquatic Centre insignia from 1989.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWk8YPx2zHziHgvyPy_9fxQ
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryanthescooterguy/
http://ryansbedroom.tumblr.com/

Goodsy
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1107
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:39 am

Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn

#639 Post by Goodsy » Sun Jan 31, 2016 12:16 pm

The Scooter Guy wrote:
metro wrote:
Norman wrote:To be fair...
1. This has only been the third accident on the line since it opened.
what about all the cars that find their way onto the tracks? those are accidents and end up bringing the city's only well used rapid transit line to a standstill, and they happen fairly regularly. :roll:
And what would happen if a tyre or guide wheel were to disintegrate whilst going at 90km/h?
Well that's a big if, has that ever happened before? It would do a lot less damage then a train derailment at 90km that's for sure

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn

#640 Post by monotonehell » Sun Jan 31, 2016 6:46 pm

The Scooter Guy wrote:And what would happen if a tyre or guide wheel were to disintegrate whilst going at 90km/h?
Not much. The tyres are reinforced in case of a blowout.
https://youtu.be/9A5BCbovR9s?t=4m15s
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2559
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn

#641 Post by Patrick_27 » Mon Feb 01, 2016 12:19 am

monotonehell wrote:
The Scooter Guy wrote:And what would happen if a tyre or guide wheel were to disintegrate whilst going at 90km/h?
Not much. The tyres are reinforced in case of a blowout.
https://youtu.be/9A5BCbovR9s?t=4m15s
The lack of trees alongside the track in the video goes to show just how wide the corridor is/was for the Modbury Freeway, perhaps the concept could still see the light of day?

User avatar
electrictechron
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 8:45 pm
Location: TTG

Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn

#642 Post by electrictechron » Mon Feb 01, 2016 7:18 am

monotonehell wrote:
The Scooter Guy wrote:And what would happen if a tyre or guide wheel were to disintegrate whilst going at 90km/h?
Not much. The tyres are reinforced in case of a blowout.
https://youtu.be/9A5BCbovR9s?t=4m15s
But that video shows the old Mercedes, not the Scania CB60s or CB80s.
I wouldn't be surprised if Transfield (now "Broadspectrum") didn't bother putting reinforced tyres on the new buses.
The JetExpress must be saved!

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn

#643 Post by monotonehell » Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:35 am

electrictechron wrote:But that video shows the old Mercedes, not the Scania CB60s or CB80s.
I wouldn't be surprised if Transfield (now "Broadspectrum") didn't bother putting reinforced tyres on the new buses.
Interesting point. I would think it would be a requirement, like the guide wheels, to put the metal wheels on. But I've never seen anything to confirm or deny this.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

User avatar
electrictechron
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 8:45 pm
Location: TTG

Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn

#644 Post by electrictechron » Thu Feb 04, 2016 10:25 pm

monotonehell wrote:
electrictechron wrote:But that video shows the old Mercedes, not the Scania CB60s or CB80s.
I wouldn't be surprised if Transfield (now "Broadspectrum") didn't bother putting reinforced tyres on the new buses.
Interesting point. I would think it would be a requirement, like the guide wheels, to put the metal wheels on. But I've never seen anything to confirm or deny this.
If or when the relevant authorities tell people what happened in the crash we can see wether this was actually a problem with the bus or driver error.
(I think it is driver error)
The JetExpress must be saved!

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6488
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn

#645 Post by Norman » Wed Mar 02, 2016 10:14 pm

The DAC approved this project today.

Going through the papers, there is a concept for a yet-to-be-funded pedestrian bridge near St. Peters College. The concept plan can be seen on Page 14 here: http://www.dac.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/ ... LANS_1.pdf

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AG, Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot] and 4 guests