[U/C] M2 North-South Motorway

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

[U/C] [U/C] Re: [U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#6301 Post by ChillyPhilly » Sun Sep 29, 2024 3:40 pm

Norman wrote:The most recent design included space for a rail line to the west of the road, the middle of the road design was removed a long time ago.
Correct, the rail component was to be built on an embankment adjacent to the road. I might be wrong but I think the embankment is already constructed in parts.

It would have connected to existing rail going west to the Le Fevre Peninsula and heading north to Virginia.
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

[U/C] [U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#6302 Post by Waewick » Mon Sep 30, 2024 1:06 pm

I assume with all this expertise we will be gaining over this project, we will have plans to continue to utilise it in other projects post 2031?

Seems a waste if not. I mean apart from the finished product of course

EBG
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3100
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:49 pm

[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#6303 Post by EBG » Mon Sep 30, 2024 4:18 pm

The tunnel boring machines should have been here 3 years ago. labour has spent the last 3 years evaluating the libleral project costings

User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

[U/C] Re: [U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#6304 Post by ChillyPhilly » Mon Sep 30, 2024 5:09 pm

EBG wrote:The tunnel boring machines should have been here 3 years ago. labour has spent the last 3 years evaluating the libleral project costings
Interesting considering Labor has been in power for only two of those years.
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6380
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[U/C] Re: [U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#6305 Post by rev » Wed Oct 02, 2024 9:34 pm

ChillyPhilly wrote:
Mon Sep 30, 2024 5:09 pm
EBG wrote:The tunnel boring machines should have been here 3 years ago. labour has spent the last 3 years evaluating the libleral project costings
Interesting considering Labor has been in power for only two of those years.
I think he means with the change in government from Labor to Liberal back to Labor and each government looking at plans and drawing up their own.
If we hadn't had Liberals come in, chances are this project would have been well underway a couple of years earlier.

abc
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1159
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:35 pm

[U/C] Re: [U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#6306 Post by abc » Wed Oct 02, 2024 10:10 pm

rev wrote:
Wed Oct 02, 2024 9:34 pm
ChillyPhilly wrote:
Mon Sep 30, 2024 5:09 pm
EBG wrote:The tunnel boring machines should have been here 3 years ago. labour has spent the last 3 years evaluating the libleral project costings
Interesting considering Labor has been in power for only two of those years.
I think he means with the change in government from Labor to Liberal back to Labor and each government looking at plans and drawing up their own.
If we hadn't had Liberals come in, chances are this project would have been well underway a couple of years earlier.
or if covid didn't happen... :roll:
tired of low IQ hacks

SBD
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2708
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
Location: Blakeview

[U/C] Re: [U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#6307 Post by SBD » Thu Oct 03, 2024 12:01 am

abc wrote:
Wed Oct 02, 2024 10:10 pm
rev wrote:
Wed Oct 02, 2024 9:34 pm
ChillyPhilly wrote:
Mon Sep 30, 2024 5:09 pm
Interesting considering Labor has been in power for only two of those years.
I think he means with the change in government from Labor to Liberal back to Labor and each government looking at plans and drawing up their own.
If we hadn't had Liberals come in, chances are this project would have been well underway a couple of years earlier.
or if covid didn't happen... :roll:
The Weatherill Labor plan didn't need TBMs. The section past Castle Plaza was going to be elevated like the Superway north of Regency Road. The section near Henley Beach Road and Sir Donald Bradman Drive was to include two short cut and cover tunnels. The tram bridge was wide enough for that version.

Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2554
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

[U/C] Re: [U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#6308 Post by Patrick_27 » Thu Oct 03, 2024 5:38 pm

SBD wrote:
Thu Oct 03, 2024 12:01 am
abc wrote:
Wed Oct 02, 2024 10:10 pm
rev wrote:
Wed Oct 02, 2024 9:34 pm


I think he means with the change in government from Labor to Liberal back to Labor and each government looking at plans and drawing up their own.
If we hadn't had Liberals come in, chances are this project would have been well underway a couple of years earlier.
or if covid didn't happen... :roll:
The Weatherill Labor plan didn't need TBMs. The section past Castle Plaza was going to be elevated like the Superway north of Regency Road. The section near Henley Beach Road and Sir Donald Bradman Drive was to include two short cut and cover tunnels. The tram bridge was wide enough for that version.
Precisely. A lot of Labor's approach for this corridor was, in my opinion, low cost and not the best outcomes. Which I get they were sticking to a budget, but Labor typically spend a lot when in government, and the improvements required for this corridor are a once in a generation investment.

The way I view it:

- The Northern Connector is the best project outcome delivered so far on along the North-South corridor.
- The Superway was over engineered and for the time a significant over investment.
- Gallipoli underpass always seemed to be a short-term fix until a broader plan came to fruition.
- The Glenelg tram overpass considered future planning but felt like it was a rushed project.
- Pymm Street to Regency Road is probably the next best stretch of this corridor in terms of the final product.
- Darlington is also a good stretch of road (I attribute this the sloped walls allowing more natural light into the roadway) but the road surface is somewhat of a rollercoaster.
- Northern expressway felt like it was done on the cheap and perhaps this is something that they will revisit with urban sprawl.
- Duplication of the Southern Expressway did the job it needed to.
- Torrens to Torrens is probably the worst stretch of road, similar to Darlington the cost cutting has meant it's a roller coast surface, the remediation of the surrounding area was poor, the one entry/exit on this section for Port Road, is chaotic, and unlike Darlington, you feel like the walls are closing in on you.

Some of my points might seem more related to aesthetic but I figure, if we're going to wedge a freeway through any suburban area, a certain level of care needs to be applied in the final product, just the same as for functionality, doing things on the cheap for a project that will likely only be done once isn't acceptable.

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6380
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[U/C] Re: [U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#6309 Post by rev » Fri Oct 04, 2024 5:44 pm

Patrick_27 wrote:
Thu Oct 03, 2024 5:38 pm
SBD wrote:
Thu Oct 03, 2024 12:01 am
abc wrote:
Wed Oct 02, 2024 10:10 pm


or if covid didn't happen... :roll:
The Weatherill Labor plan didn't need TBMs. The section past Castle Plaza was going to be elevated like the Superway north of Regency Road. The section near Henley Beach Road and Sir Donald Bradman Drive was to include two short cut and cover tunnels. The tram bridge was wide enough for that version.
Precisely. A lot of Labor's approach for this corridor was, in my opinion, low cost and not the best outcomes. Which I get they were sticking to a budget, but Labor typically spend a lot when in government, and the improvements required for this corridor are a once in a generation investment.

The way I view it:

- The Northern Connector is the best project outcome delivered so far on along the North-South corridor.
- The Superway was over engineered and for the time a significant over investment.
- Gallipoli underpass always seemed to be a short-term fix until a broader plan came to fruition.
- The Glenelg tram overpass considered future planning but felt like it was a rushed project.
- Pymm Street to Regency Road is probably the next best stretch of this corridor in terms of the final product.
- Darlington is also a good stretch of road (I attribute this the sloped walls allowing more natural light into the roadway) but the road surface is somewhat of a rollercoaster.
- Northern expressway felt like it was done on the cheap and perhaps this is something that they will revisit with urban sprawl.
- Duplication of the Southern Expressway did the job it needed to.
- Torrens to Torrens is probably the worst stretch of road, similar to Darlington the cost cutting has meant it's a roller coast surface, the remediation of the surrounding area was poor, the one entry/exit on this section for Port Road, is chaotic, and unlike Darlington, you feel like the walls are closing in on you.

Some of my points might seem more related to aesthetic but I figure, if we're going to wedge a freeway through any suburban area, a certain level of care needs to be applied in the final product, just the same as for functionality, doing things on the cheap for a project that will likely only be done once isn't acceptable.
In hindsight, I think they've done the best they can in a shitty situation.
Constrained by trying to basically trying to retro-fit a freeway in a built up urban environment while trying to mitigate community displacement given South Australian's still seem to remember MATS and the scaremongering (rightly or wrongly), as well as budget constraints with the political pressures of not putting the state in significant debt.

EBG
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3100
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:49 pm

[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#6310 Post by EBG » Sat Oct 05, 2024 8:41 am

Stop planing and start digging . Adelaide most be the most overplaned and underdeveloped City in Australia.

mattblack
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1084
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 11:20 am

[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#6311 Post by mattblack » Sat Oct 05, 2024 9:00 am

EBG wrote:
Sat Oct 05, 2024 8:41 am
Stop planing and start digging . Adelaide most be the most overplaned and underdeveloped City in Australia.
I'd rather that than the shitshow in Sydney with the Rozelle Interchange along the private partnerships that push infrastructure projects along at breakneck speeds which end up costing residents mega bucks to use.

User avatar
Ursus Maritimus
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 197
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2022 4:54 pm

[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#6312 Post by Ursus Maritimus » Mon Oct 07, 2024 8:50 am

What's worse? Congestion and wasted time, or having to pay heavy tolls to a greedy foreign corporation in order to drive across the city? I'd say it's the latter, just. I think the worst thing about tolls is that they are effectively regressive taxes. Better-off people can not only better afford tolls, but they're likelier to live close enough to work so they don't need to use toll roads (or likelier to work from home).

Will these tunnel-boring machines be entombed permanently in the ground once their job is done or will they be taken away in this instance?

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3290
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#6313 Post by [Shuz] » Mon Oct 07, 2024 9:40 am

A smart forward thinking government would plan ahead and repurpose them for the following projects which will also require tunnelling;

- Underground CBD Rail
- Mount Barker Rail
- East West Link

Unfortunately we're in short supply of smart forward thinking politicians.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

mattblack
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1084
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 11:20 am

[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#6314 Post by mattblack » Mon Oct 07, 2024 10:07 am

Love to see the R1 ring road and short south added to that list.

Not sure how long these things last. Be boring continuously for 20+ yrs which would be fun.

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3290
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#6315 Post by [Shuz] » Mon Oct 07, 2024 11:20 am

mattblack wrote:
Mon Oct 07, 2024 10:07 am
Love to see the R1 ring road and short south added to that list.

Not sure how long these things last. Be boring continuously for 20+ yrs which would be fun.
Short South / East West Link are the same thing.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 6 guests