[U/C] M2 North-South Motorway
-
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2695
- Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
- Location: Adelaide CBD, SA
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
It’s more aesthetically pleasing but it’s not a practical solution. In fact, the way I see it, it will only cause more issues with the flow of traffic than having right-hand turning lanes.
You’re sending all traffic from ANZAC Hwy intending to head north or south on the N-S Motorway through a set of traffic lights to a single lane loop road that lands you at a stop whilst waiting for traffic (stationary or moving) to let you in, once you’re finally on south road you’re then back at another set of traffic lights. A slip road might fix this but given there will be thousands of cars using this option each day, you’re going to see a back up of traffic trying to use this system. I know the flyover concept was pulled to pieces by locals but I dare say the property acquisition required for these loops and the headaches they will cause long term are going to cost a lot more than a couple of flyovers would have both fiscally and aesthetically.
You’re sending all traffic from ANZAC Hwy intending to head north or south on the N-S Motorway through a set of traffic lights to a single lane loop road that lands you at a stop whilst waiting for traffic (stationary or moving) to let you in, once you’re finally on south road you’re then back at another set of traffic lights. A slip road might fix this but given there will be thousands of cars using this option each day, you’re going to see a back up of traffic trying to use this system. I know the flyover concept was pulled to pieces by locals but I dare say the property acquisition required for these loops and the headaches they will cause long term are going to cost a lot more than a couple of flyovers would have both fiscally and aesthetically.
- ChillyPhilly
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: Kaurna Land.
- Contact:
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
This intersection really could/should have made use of a diverging diamond or contraflow interchange:


Our state, our city, our future.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
- SouthAussie94
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 648
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:03 pm
- Location: Southern Suburbs
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
It seems to be a similar concept to what they've done at Port Rd. Turn left to Turn right.
This is a much more compact application of it though. I can see the tight nature of it causing issues.
This is a much more compact application of it though. I can see the tight nature of it causing issues.
"All we are is bags of bones pushing against a self imposed tide. Just be content with staying alive"
Views and opinions expressed are my own and don't necessarily reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation
Views and opinions expressed are my own and don't necessarily reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
The pedestrian crossings appear to be set back from the line of the noise walls. A car/truck approaching on South Road intending to turn left needs to slow down next to or in the bike lane while traffic around it s expecting to continue to the traffic lights. The turning vehicle then needs to be alert to pedestrians on the crossing which may have been obscured by the sound wall until the vehicle had started the turn.SouthAussie94 wrote: ↑Thu May 29, 2025 10:51 amIt seems to be a similar concept to what they've done at Port Rd. Turn left to Turn right.
This is a much more compact application of it though. I can see the tight nature of it causing issues.
When this is opened, I'd like to see Mr Koutsantonis take his daughter for a bike ride along those bike lanes to demonstrate their safety.
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
Why, just because there is a lowered section of road does there need to be some sort of traffic gymnastics? I still don’t get the port road set up every time I use it. Travelling 50 meters East, to do a u turn to travel west just makes no sense to me. In the scheme of this massive project… buying some extra land at the intersection to create an extra turning lane would alleviate all of this surely.
- Llessur2002
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2163
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
- Location: Inner West
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
I think it was more about avoiding the additional lights cycle than the land for a turning lane. The traffic modelling released at the time showed it was as quick or quicker to turn left to turn right than to hold the whole intersection up with a separate right turn cycle for N-S traffic on the surface road.claybro wrote: ↑Fri May 30, 2025 12:05 amWhy, just because there is a lowered section of road does there need to be some sort of traffic gymnastics? I still don’t get the port road set up every time I use it. Travelling 50 meters East, to do a u turn to travel west just makes no sense to me. In the scheme of this massive project… buying some extra land at the intersection to create an extra turning lane would alleviate all of this surely.
I do this turn all the time to be honest and it's really no bother. The lights cycles are timed pretty well so that there is minimal waiting time at the u-turn intersection on Port Road, and once you're through that the main intersection is always green. I can't see a separate right turn lane being any quicker at all.
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
This is a far better solution for both Anzac Highway and Port Roads.ChillyPhilly wrote: ↑Thu May 29, 2025 10:04 amThis intersection really could/should have made use of a diverging diamond or contraflow interchange:
![]()
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
2 sets of lights for all traffic using port Rd or Anzac highway doesn't sound good.
Diverging diamond seems more appropriate if the crossing road is minor.
Also the surface south Rd for both of these intersections goes straight which isn't managed by the diamond.
Diverging diamond seems more appropriate if the crossing road is minor.
Also the surface south Rd for both of these intersections goes straight which isn't managed by the diamond.
- SouthAussie94
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 648
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:03 pm
- Location: Southern Suburbs
[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
How much traffic will actually be turning right from Anzac to head north? Mainly those coming from Leader St?
Surely most City/Greenhill Rd traffic will enter the motorway northbound from Richmond Rd or Port Rd (for City traffic)?
Southbound, I can see a reasonable amount of traffic turning right from Anzac to the Motorway as the alternative is to drive along the surface road/alternate route to Darlington.
Surely most City/Greenhill Rd traffic will enter the motorway northbound from Richmond Rd or Port Rd (for City traffic)?
Southbound, I can see a reasonable amount of traffic turning right from Anzac to the Motorway as the alternative is to drive along the surface road/alternate route to Darlington.
"All we are is bags of bones pushing against a self imposed tide. Just be content with staying alive"
Views and opinions expressed are my own and don't necessarily reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation
Views and opinions expressed are my own and don't necessarily reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 21 guests