Page 47 of 81
[COM] Re: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:46 am
by how good is he
Any reason considering the advantages over bitumen they don’t build more roads out of concrete then?
Anyone know how does the cost compare?
[COM] Re: [U/C] Re: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 9:51 am
by Norman
how good is he wrote:Any reason considering the advantages over bitumen they don’t build more roads out of concrete then?
Anyone know how does the cost compare?
This was discussed before. Concrete roads are more expensive but have reduced maintainance costs, especially for roads that see a high amount of truck usage
[COM] Re: [U/C] Re: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 10:15 am
by rogue
Norman wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 9:51 am
how good is he wrote:Any reason considering the advantages over bitumen they don’t build more roads out of concrete then?
Anyone know how does the cost compare?
This was discussed before. Concrete roads are more expensive but have reduced maintainance costs, especially for roads that see a high amount of truck usage
Concrete roads also have less rolling resistance than asphalt roads.
[COM] Re: [U/C] Re: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 10:51 am
by Listy
rogue wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 10:15 am
Norman wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 9:51 am
how good is he wrote:Any reason considering the advantages over bitumen they don’t build more roads out of concrete then?
Anyone know how does the cost compare?
This was discussed before. Concrete roads are more expensive but have reduced maintainance costs, especially for roads that see a high amount of truck usage
Concrete roads also have less rolling resistance than asphalt roads.
One reason for their relative unpopularity is that a lot of motorways built in Europe/UK with concrete in the post war period quickly got a bad reputation for the constant loud road buzz & 'bump bump bump' sensation as you drove over the gaps and cracks in the surface. The last few remnants of concreted motorways in the UK are being asphalted because of this. Modern construction techniques may have largely solved these problems - I guess we will find out after a few years of use how the northern expressway turns out in that respect.
[COM] Re: [U/C] Re: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 7:10 pm
by rev
Listy wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 10:51 am
rogue wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 10:15 am
Norman wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 9:51 am
This was discussed before. Concrete roads are more expensive but have reduced maintainance costs, especially for roads that see a high amount of truck usage
Concrete roads also have less rolling resistance than asphalt roads.
One reason for their relative unpopularity is that a lot of motorways built in Europe/UK with concrete in the post war period quickly got a bad reputation for the constant loud road buzz & 'bump bump bump' sensation as you drove over the gaps and cracks in the surface. The last few remnants of concreted motorways in the UK are being asphalted because of this. Modern construction techniques may have largely solved these problems - I guess we will find out after a few years of use how the northern expressway turns out in that respect.
I wonder how long before it cracks during our extreme summer heat.
[COM] Re: [U/C] Re: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 7:19 pm
by Goodsy
rev wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 7:10 pm
Listy wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 10:51 am
rogue wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 10:15 am
Concrete roads also have less rolling resistance than asphalt roads.
One reason for their relative unpopularity is that a lot of motorways built in Europe/UK with concrete in the post war period quickly got a bad reputation for the constant loud road buzz & 'bump bump bump' sensation as you drove over the gaps and cracks in the surface. The last few remnants of concreted motorways in the UK are being asphalted because of this. Modern construction techniques may have largely solved these problems - I guess we will find out after a few years of use how the northern expressway turns out in that respect.
I wonder how long before it cracks during our extreme summer heat.
Texas seems to be fine with concrete interstates
[COM] Re: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 8:29 pm
by Aidan
Listy wrote:One reason for their relative unpopularity is that a lot of motorways built in Europe/UK with concrete in the post war period quickly got a bad reputation for the constant loud road buzz & 'bump bump bump' sensation as you drove over the gaps and cracks in the surface. The last few remnants of concreted motorways in the UK are being asphalted because of this. Modern construction techniques may have largely solved these problems - I guess we will find out after a few years of use how the northern expressway turns out in that respect.
In Britain even when they were new, the concrete sections of motorway built in the 1980s were a lot noisier than the asphalt sections. So when I was at uni I was surprised to hear the opposite was the case on the Hume Highway. But I've not travelled over the concrete sections of that, so I'd be interested to hear the opinions of anyone here who has.
[COM] Re: [U/C] Re: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2018 10:54 am
by Norman
Aidan wrote:Listy wrote:One reason for their relative unpopularity is that a lot of motorways built in Europe/UK with concrete in the post war period quickly got a bad reputation for the constant loud road buzz & 'bump bump bump' sensation as you drove over the gaps and cracks in the surface. The last few remnants of concreted motorways in the UK are being asphalted because of this. Modern construction techniques may have largely solved these problems - I guess we will find out after a few years of use how the northern expressway turns out in that respect.
In Britain even when they were new, the concrete sections of motorway built in the 1980s were a lot noisier than the asphalt sections. So when I was at uni I was surprised to hear the opposite was the case on the Hume Highway. But I've not travelled over the concrete sections of that, so I'd be interested to hear the opinions of anyone here who has.
It depends on the car you're driving, but it was fine last time I drove on it. There wasn't too much noise, especially on the newer sections.
[COM] Re: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2018 7:47 pm
by ChillyPhilly
The Pacific Motorway west of Gold Coast is largely concrete, and that was pretty noisy.
[COM] [U/C] [U/C] [U/C] Re: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2018 2:34 pm
by ChillyPhilly
Snapped these (rather illegally from the driver's seat) today.
The first bridge beams have been installed over PRExy.
.
[COM] Re: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2018 12:10 pm
by Mr Messy
There are now some decent images on the project site.
https://infrastructure.sa.gov.au/nsc/no ... eo_gallery
Click through the render for each interchange
[COM] Re: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2018 7:43 pm
by ChillyPhilly
I like how the renders show the surface as being asphalt.
[COM] Re: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2018 8:47 pm
by SBD
ChillyPhilly wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 7:43 pm
I like how the renders show the surface as being asphalt.
I think those pictures were done before the decision to use concrete. They are only "artist's impressions, and "everybody knows" that roads are grey. The artist's render of the northern interchange is missing two supports that are presently under the PWR bridge. I doubt they are planned to be removed, so am happy to take any other details as artistic too.
[COM] Re: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2018 9:04 pm
by Mr Messy
They're screen caps from the concept video, which is pre-concrete road announcement
[COM] Re: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2018 8:23 pm
by Eurostar
In the original plan wasn't there direct access from OTR Bolivar to the Northern Connector Southbound?