News & Discussion: Low/Mid-Rise CBD Development
Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise
Driving past the site today I noticed temporary fencing with 'Candetti' signage on it - Candetti being the selected contractor - looks like this one's starting upAdelarch wrote:found this on a website someone posted in another thread on a separate topic. The website blurb suggests its due for completion in late 2009 - hope so..
http://www.commongroundadelaide.org.au/ ... sp?prop=2#
- Xaragmata
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 1613
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:08 pm
- Location: Adelaide / West
- Contact:
Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise
Scaffolding is up on the existing building & work is underwayAdelarch wrote:Adelarch wrote:found this on a website someone posted in another thread on a separate topic. The website blurb suggests its due for completion in late 2009 - hope so..
http://www.commongroundadelaide.org.au/ ... sp?prop=2#
Driving past the site today I noticed temporary fencing with 'Candetti' signage on it - Candetti being the selected contractor - looks like this one's starting up
Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise
Went back to page 40 I think it was to get this render of the building.
Looks like just a block but always good to get another tower crane on the skyline.
Looks like just a block but always good to get another tower crane on the skyline.
Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken
Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise
Silly Pistol, you could have just searched my site.
http://www.sensational-adelaide.com/for ... 432#p39432
http://www.sensational-adelaide.com/for ... 432#p39432
Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise
Argh, I keep forgetting your map...
Sorry Adam.
Sorry Adam.
Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken
Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise
It appears that the student apartment development at 242-248 Franklin Street, which was denied planning approval at an earlier ACC DAP meeting in August of this year was approved on october 7, following some amendments to the proposal, the most significant of these was an increment in the size of the apartments.
I think that this time a rejection by the ACC has had a positive end outcome.
From realestate.com:
I think that this time a rejection by the ACC has had a positive end outcome.
From realestate.com:
This brand new student apartment has just been approved by Adelaide City Council. The building has 24 student apartments and a 139sqm retail area. So close to Universities and Central Market. Construction will start from mid 2010 and finish by the end of 2011. When considering the booming student market, this is really a "Hard Working" cash cow for you.
Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise
Maybe this is not just a pipe dream. As I was walking to Rundle Street tonight, I noticed that the current building on site has been fenced off and it appears that it will be demolished.Adelarch wrote:Well here's something interesting. Spotted this on the website of the architect who designed the rejected 7 level building in Kent Town . I've got absolutely no idea on the 'status' of this one - according to the website its a concept for a site Pulteney Street - but purely based on the render I sure hope it goes ahead! Looks like its on the corner of Ifould st
http://www.dcarchitecture.com.au/
- Prince George
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 974
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:02 pm
- Location: Melrose Park
Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise
Adelarch had said it looked like that render showed the corner of Ifould St. Is that right? Is it related to this thread, or are there two different things happening on that one (pretty small) street?
Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise
I'm also a bit confused. I originally thought the Ifould St crane was for this project:
But I realise now that this is supposed to be a lot further east, at 22-26 Ifould Street which is closer to Hutt St.
So what is being built?
But I realise now that this is supposed to be a lot further east, at 22-26 Ifould Street which is closer to Hutt St.
So what is being built?
Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise
Indeed, both the above projects are on ifould Street.
The first one:
this project is the one that is currently being built. This one is on the Hutt Street end of Ifould Street
The second one, is a completely separate project altogether:
This project is at the Pulteney end of Ifould Street. This project is still a vision as no plans have been submitted to the council. However, the current building on site is being demolished.
The first one:
this project is the one that is currently being built. This one is on the Hutt Street end of Ifould Street
The second one, is a completely separate project altogether:
This project is at the Pulteney end of Ifould Street. This project is still a vision as no plans have been submitted to the council. However, the current building on site is being demolished.
Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise
Unfortunately, the existing building on the corner of Ifould & Pulteney is not being demolished. This past week they have started rendering it.
Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise
Nice looking building, prob would be best suited to KWS or the like. Would be good to visit the actual site to get a true appreciation for the concerns raised.
Renders and current site pictures in the below link.
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/stor ... 82,00.html
Renders and current site pictures in the below link.
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/stor ... 82,00.html
Council rejects 'amazing' building
AN "AMAZING" building planned for Hutt St has been refused development approval because it would replace one of three Victorian cottages.
The five-storey dining, office and apartment building proposed for 13-16 Hutt St was last night rejected by Adelaide City Council's Development Assessment Panel, despite panel members praising its design and the life it would bring to the east end of the city.
Deputy Lord Mayor Michael Henningsen said it was "a great design that would sit so nicely in any other place but here", David Grieve described the proposed building as "pretty amazing" and along with fellow independent panel member Professor Mads Gaardboe said he hoped to see it built elsewhere in the city one day.
The proposal was blocked because it required the demolition of the central building in a row of three "high Victorian" style cottages.
The cottage and those either side of it are not heritage listed but the council's development plan guidelines for the East End requires "the conservation and re-use of heritage places and distinctive buildings of historical and commercial character".
In a report to the panel, council planning staff said the building would "bring commercial activity, outdoor dining, residential use and interest to a portion of Hutt Street that is currently lacking in vibrancy and pedestrian activity".
But the panel voted to refuse development approval, citing the damage that would be caused to the area's distinctive historical streetscape.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests