News & Discussion: Low/Mid-Rise CBD Development

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise

#706 Post by AtD » Sat Aug 22, 2009 5:51 pm

Thanks Will. Duly noted.

Adelarch
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 274
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:34 pm

Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise

#707 Post by Adelarch » Sat Aug 22, 2009 6:42 pm

Adelarch wrote:found this on a website someone posted in another thread on a separate topic. The website blurb suggests its due for completion in late 2009 - hope so..

http://www.commongroundadelaide.org.au/ ... sp?prop=2#

Image
Driving past the site today I noticed temporary fencing with 'Candetti' signage on it - Candetti being the selected contractor - looks like this one's starting up :)

Adelarch
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 274
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:34 pm

#708 Post by Adelarch » Sun Aug 23, 2009 11:51 am

quick pic showing progress of the affordable eco-housing development in Whitmore square plus the 5 level Colangelo development next door on Sturt St

Image

User avatar
Xaragmata
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1613
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:08 pm
Location: Adelaide / West
Contact:

Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise

#709 Post by Xaragmata » Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:40 pm

Adelarch wrote:
Adelarch wrote:found this on a website someone posted in another thread on a separate topic. The website blurb suggests its due for completion in late 2009 - hope so..

http://www.commongroundadelaide.org.au/ ... sp?prop=2#

Driving past the site today I noticed temporary fencing with 'Candetti' signage on it - Candetti being the selected contractor - looks like this one's starting up :)
Scaffolding is up on the existing building & work is underway

Image

mattblack
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1107
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 11:20 am

Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise

#710 Post by mattblack » Tue Oct 20, 2009 3:01 pm

Tower crane going up on 8 level development on Ifould st

User avatar
Pistol
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1012
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 5:46 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise

#711 Post by Pistol » Tue Oct 20, 2009 5:13 pm

Went back to page 40 I think it was to get this render of the building.
Looks like just a block but always good to get another tower crane on the skyline.
Image
Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise

#712 Post by AtD » Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:27 pm

Silly Pistol, you could have just searched my site. :mrgreen:
http://www.sensational-adelaide.com/for ... 432#p39432

User avatar
Pistol
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1012
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 5:46 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise

#713 Post by Pistol » Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:34 pm

Argh, I keep forgetting your map...

Sorry Adam.
Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5864
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise

#714 Post by Will » Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:58 pm

It appears that the student apartment development at 242-248 Franklin Street, which was denied planning approval at an earlier ACC DAP meeting in August of this year was approved on october 7, following some amendments to the proposal, the most significant of these was an increment in the size of the apartments.

I think that this time a rejection by the ACC has had a positive end outcome.

From realestate.com:
This brand new student apartment has just been approved by Adelaide City Council. The building has 24 student apartments and a 139sqm retail area. So close to Universities and Central Market. Construction will start from mid 2010 and finish by the end of 2011. When considering the booming student market, this is really a "Hard Working" cash cow for you.
Image

Image

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5864
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise

#715 Post by Will » Sun Nov 01, 2009 12:43 am

Adelarch wrote:Well here's something interesting. Spotted this on the website of the architect who designed the rejected 7 level building in Kent Town . I've got absolutely no idea on the 'status' of this one - according to the website its a concept for a site Pulteney Street - but purely based on the render I sure hope it goes ahead! Looks like its on the corner of Ifould st

http://www.dcarchitecture.com.au/

Image
Maybe this is not just a pipe dream. As I was walking to Rundle Street tonight, I noticed that the current building on site has been fenced off and it appears that it will be demolished.

User avatar
Prince George
Legendary Member!
Posts: 974
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:02 pm
Location: Melrose Park

Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise

#716 Post by Prince George » Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:40 am

Adelarch had said it looked like that render showed the corner of Ifould St. Is that right? Is it related to this thread, or are there two different things happening on that one (pretty small) street?

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise

#717 Post by AtD » Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:00 am

I'm also a bit confused. I originally thought the Ifould St crane was for this project:

Image

But I realise now that this is supposed to be a lot further east, at 22-26 Ifould Street which is closer to Hutt St.

So what is being built? :?

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5864
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise

#718 Post by Will » Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:41 pm

Indeed, both the above projects are on ifould Street.

The first one:

Image

this project is the one that is currently being built. This one is on the Hutt Street end of Ifould Street



The second one, is a completely separate project altogether:

Image

This project is at the Pulteney end of Ifould Street. This project is still a vision as no plans have been submitted to the council. However, the current building on site is being demolished.

Raider
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:05 pm

Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise

#719 Post by Raider » Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:10 pm

Unfortunately, the existing building on the corner of Ifould & Pulteney is not being demolished. This past week they have started rendering it.

Brando
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 3:11 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: CBD Development: Low/Mid-Rise

#720 Post by Brando » Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:47 am

Nice looking building, prob would be best suited to KWS or the like. Would be good to visit the actual site to get a true appreciation for the concerns raised.
Renders and current site pictures in the below link.

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/stor ... 82,00.html

Council rejects 'amazing' building
AN "AMAZING" building planned for Hutt St has been refused development approval because it would replace one of three Victorian cottages.

The five-storey dining, office and apartment building proposed for 13-16 Hutt St was last night rejected by Adelaide City Council's Development Assessment Panel, despite panel members praising its design and the life it would bring to the east end of the city.

Deputy Lord Mayor Michael Henningsen said it was "a great design that would sit so nicely in any other place but here", David Grieve described the proposed building as "pretty amazing" and along with fellow independent panel member Professor Mads Gaardboe said he hoped to see it built elsewhere in the city one day.

The proposal was blocked because it required the demolition of the central building in a row of three "high Victorian" style cottages.

The cottage and those either side of it are not heritage listed but the council's development plan guidelines for the East End requires "the conservation and re-use of heritage places and distinctive buildings of historical and commercial character".

In a report to the panel, council planning staff said the building would "bring commercial activity, outdoor dining, residential use and interest to a portion of Hutt Street that is currently lacking in vibrancy and pedestrian activity".

But the panel voted to refuse development approval, citing the damage that would be caused to the area's distinctive historical streetscape.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests