Page 50 of 208
Re: New Tallest? This is not a joke!
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:39 pm
by rev
I find the curved building of more interest then the taller one.
Re: New Tallest? This is not a joke!
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:49 pm
by Xaragmata
Will wrote:Urban Construct has recently updated their website an having a look I found this image:
I also found these images. Likewise there is no information about the project but, they could be in Adelaide:
This is the northern side of Dock One, and is the type of building proposed for the area. The bridge would be a handy link, if built.
Re: New Tallest? This is not a joke!
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:07 pm
by spiller
It was only a matter of time! The curved building looks very interesting. The glass "twin tower" looks impressive due to its sheer height.
looking forward to some more information...
Re: New Tallest? This is not a joke!
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:33 pm
by Pants
Will wrote:
Something tells me these are on South Tce.
Re: New Tallest? This is not a joke!
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:36 pm
by metro
*checks callender* nah it's not april...
some of those look pretty damn fine, if only *insert doubt here*
Re: New Tallest? This is not a joke!
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:42 pm
by Waewick
it does say "into the future"
Re: New Tallest? This is not a joke!
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 4:00 pm
by AdelaideAlive
How can we get these great new buildings up when the stupid council wont even approve 19 storey buildings for the cbd, what ajoke we have, a city where there is height restrictions, where are we supposed to build tall buildings flinders ranges
The sooner we take all height restrictions off in cbd the better adelaide will become rather than a hick town every other mainland city jokes about!!!!!!
Re: New Tallest? This is not a joke!
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 4:25 pm
by Pants
AdelaideAlive wrote:How can we get these great new buildings up when the stupid council wont even approve 19 storey buildings for the cbd...
Take decisions on major buildings out of the ACC's hands as has already been done?
Re: New Tallest? This is not a joke!
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 4:28 pm
by AtD
^^ Council doesn't approve 19 story buildings, the state does. Try again.
This reminds me of what was proposed for 300-ish King William Street, on the western side.
Re: New Tallest? This is not a joke!
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:08 pm
by Pikey
I count the tallest tower at 46 levels, and it appears it is on a podium too. So, say a 2 level podium at 4m each, followed by 46 levels at worst case 3.3m, we've got a 160m tower, not including the feature on top. So, around the 165m mark, which wouldn't be outrageously tall for Adelaide.
We'd have a new tallest by nearly 20m!!
Wowsers, go Urbans, good luck getting that through!!
Re: New Tallest? This is not a joke!
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:01 pm
by Nort
This would look fantastic in the skyline, here's hoping we see a proposal soon.
Re: New Tallest? This is not a joke!
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:10 pm
by crawf
Go Urban Construct!
Re: New Tallest? This is not a joke!
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:39 pm
by jk1237
surely that grand old building that has disappeared in the render at Vic Sq is heritage listed. Other than that very positive news
Re: New Tallest? This is not a joke!
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:50 pm
by AtD
jk1237 wrote:surely that grand old building that has disappeared in the render at Vic Sq is heritage listed. Other than that very positive news
Which one?
Re: New Tallest? This is not a joke!
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:51 pm
by jk1237
AtD wrote:jk1237 wrote:surely that grand old building that has disappeared in the render at Vic Sq is heritage listed. Other than that very positive news
Which one?
in the render there is a beige colour something. What sits there now is a grand old 6-7 level building. I will find a photo
the one on the right if it works, s-a always cuts off a lot of the right side of the photo
