Page 6 of 32
[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 230m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 7:59 pm
by Patrick_27
CDJ wrote: ↑Tue Aug 15, 2017 4:32 pm
The thread title needs correcting. The stated 230m is above height datum (AHD). This corresponds to height above ground level of approx 195m (PANS-OPS level).
The developer built Aria. U2 is now under construction. I would regard them as having more credibility than most developers in Adelaide. I am working on this project. I'm confident that the developer will build on this site and it will be the tallest building in Adelaide.
I assume Rev's 'comment' is an attempt to provoke me into releasing images. There is zero chance of this. Everything is strictly confidential until it goes in for DA, which should be soon.
It's all well and good to tells us this but your detailing is all so vague. What harm would there be in at-least telling us a rough time when we will see this go before the DAC?
[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 230m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 9:07 pm
by [Shuz]
Definitely is the Flinders 123 site.
[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 230m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 9:12 pm
by Adelaidean
[Shuz] wrote: ↑Tue Aug 15, 2017 9:07 pm
Definitely is the Flinders 123 site.
What makes you say that?
[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 230m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 9:29 pm
by serca
Both Aria and U2 are not award winning designs but they both look good enough , especially U2 - and time will tell. So hopefully this comes to fruition and the design is of better quality again. I all for height but I would rather a 195m tower than a 230m tower in the near future.
[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 230m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 8:14 am
by [Shuz]
For the umpteenth time... it is a 190m tall tower. 230m is the AHD. The thread title really needs to be changed.
[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 190m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:00 pm
by Algernon
Close this damn thread until there is something more than a thought bubble on some random's website
[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 190m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:52 pm
by Patrick_27
Algernon wrote: ↑Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:00 pm
Close this damn thread until there is something more than a thought bubble on some random's website
I agree, especially if people are going to keep bumping it over nothing.
[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 190m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 12:23 pm
by Pants
Nah. It's more than a pipe dream. It'll at least get to proposal stage and we've had plenty of those go nowhere, so even if it does all turn to crap, it's worth a thread.
[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 190m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 12:31 pm
by [Shuz]
Of noteworthy importance too, I understand the Feds are currently in the midst of reviewing airspace regulations nationwide. Fingers crossed this translates into some positive outcomes concerning PANS-OPS limitations.
[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 190m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 8:42 pm
by Adelaidean
[Shuz] wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2017 12:31 pm
Of noteworthy importance too, I understand the Feds are currently in the midst of reviewing airspace regulations nationwide. Fingers crossed this translates into some positive outcomes concerning PANS-OPS limitations.
Mhmm, tell me more.
[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 190m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2017 8:59 pm
by Spurdo
I think its probably now time to ask if our insider is able to give us a bit more information about this project
[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 190m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2017 9:21 pm
by Nort
Spurdo wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2017 8:59 pm
I think its probably now time to ask if our insider is able to give us a bit more information about this project
>.>
Got me all excited with the bump for nothing.
[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 190m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2017 9:57 pm
by Patrick_27
Can people stop bumping these unless they actually have information? Incredibly annoying.
[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 190m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 1:41 pm
by CDJ
Since it's been bumped by others, I'll take the opportunity to provide an update. I've been refraining from commenting due to the response I received earlier in the thread. It should be obvious to a sensible person why a professional can't divulge project images or specific details prior to planning submission, especially for a project of this scale.
The design competition concluded two weeks ago and the successful design team has been selected. It's a joint team of two respected architectural firms with a great track record locally and nationally, along with a team of experienced tall buildings engineers. The team have achieved an elegant design which will be a fitting tallest building for our city. The project is now focused on the approvals phase ahead. The proposed 195m height (i.e. up to PANS-OPS) obviously presents challenges from a planning perspective, but the project has significant support from key people in our city.
Suggest renaming thread as 207 Pulteney St as the 'Dominator' name is being dropped.
[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 190m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 2:37 pm
by YellowRoad
CDJ wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2017 1:41 pm
Since it's been bumped by others, I'll take the opportunity to provide an update. I've been refraining from commenting due to the response I received earlier in the thread. It should be obvious to a sensible person why a professional can't divulge project images or specific details prior to planning submission, especially for a project of this scale.
The design competition concluded two weeks ago and the successful design team has been selected. It's a joint team of two respected architectural firms with a great track record locally and nationally, along with a team of experienced tall buildings engineers. The team have achieved an elegant design which will be a fitting tallest building for our city. The project is now focused on the approvals phase ahead. The proposed 195m height (i.e. up to PANS-OPS) obviously presents challenges from a planning perspective, but the project has significant support from key people in our city.
Suggest renaming thread as 207 Pulteney St as the 'Dominator' name is being dropped.
Very interesting. Thanks for sharing what you can!