rev wrote:Waewick wrote:So after using it tonight. For 300 dsys of the year it isn't needed it is fine.
For the days it was specifically built for, to move football crowds, it isn't.
Just because some people walk slow and hold up the rest, doesn't mean there's a flaw in the design of the bridge.
I remember during the cricket, people were complaining it was over crowded. That was because there were people who decided to stop at the start and block part of the "entrance" because they were taking photos.
That pedestrian bridge over the rail lines at the MCG is much thinner then our bridge over the Torrens. Yet every time I've been to the MCG and walked over that bridge the pace has been quicker. Probably because nobody is acting like a tourist in their own town.
The footbridge would have looked more like a freeway if it had been any wider. It provides a relaxing opportunity for locals and visitors to walk/saunter across the footbridge (or run) enjoy the views, take photos etc.
It copes with the big crowds at Adelaide Oval, provided folk are patient and sensible, as most are.
Before the match, the crowds arrive over a period of hours, so no issues. After the match/event, some stay behind at the Oval to watch post match celebrations, chat with friends, drink at the bars etc. before heading to the footbridge.
Yes, there is a bottleneck (standstill, shuffle) at the Memorial Drive/AO Plaza/footbridge entry post-match, especially for blockbuster games, but once on the footbridge, you can progress at an easy walking pace across the entire footbridge. The crowd then disperses in many directions eg Festival Centre, Railway Station/Casino, Blue Hive/Convention Centre walkway/Regattas.
Perhaps the general pace on the bridge will pick up during more extreme weather?
The footbridge is a pretty good compromise between the needs of the immediate post match/event crowd and the everyday user.
And it looks superb! Love that waterfall and the lighting.