[U/C] M2 North-South Motorway
-
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:26 am
[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor
Is there any images or prelim. drafts of the route to show where th rail line would have gone? Was it also correct that this part would cost $400m? If not what was the costing?
Wayno can you draw/show your points of your rail line extension plan maybe also so I can understand better what you mean.
Wayno can you draw/show your points of your rail line extension plan maybe also so I can understand better what you mean.
[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor
I found an animation on the DPTI web site with Google. It shows light rail up the middle of Flinders Drive. The matching road animation shows the same thing, both dated October 2010. Page 12 of the Executive Summary says they would propose to operate "tram-trains" on the Tonsley line with an interchange at Woodlands Park.how good is he wrote:Is there any images or prelim. drafts of the route to show where the rail line would have gone?
- SouthAussie94
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 589
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:03 pm
- Location: Southern Suburbs
[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor
Could anyone speculate how this is likely to be constructed? Obviously the method depends largely on what the plan involves but assuming what will be built is similar to the plans released a few years ago (Road in trench, underpass at Sturt Rd and Flinders Dr, with overpass for SEXY), how would it be built while maintaining a road for traffic?
I assume that properties along one side (Western side presumably) would be acquired with a temporary City-bound road corridor built in this section. New road could then be constructed along present City-bound corridor. Once this is traffic-able, south-bound could be diverted to new road while new south-bound is built. Once this is built, traffic could then return to the correct side.
This makes sense to me however this may not be the best practice method. Is anyone with a better idea of a likely construction method able to correct me?
I assume that properties along one side (Western side presumably) would be acquired with a temporary City-bound road corridor built in this section. New road could then be constructed along present City-bound corridor. Once this is traffic-able, south-bound could be diverted to new road while new south-bound is built. Once this is built, traffic could then return to the correct side.
This makes sense to me however this may not be the best practice method. Is anyone with a better idea of a likely construction method able to correct me?
"All we are is bags of bones pushing against a self imposed tide. Just be content with staying alive"
Views and opinions expressed are my own and don't necessarily reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation
Views and opinions expressed are my own and don't necessarily reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation
-
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 522
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:54 am
- Location: Morphett Vale
[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor
My guess is that they would highly encourage use of Marion Road (both from expressway and South Road traffic), using Sturt Road as the detour when the Sturt/South intersection is fully functioning, and drop South road to a couple of lanes each way, contra-flowing onto the eastern side of the road (which may require partial closures of the South Road access at the expressway) then to the new Western side once competed.
Looking forward to a free-flowing Adelaide!
[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor
Funding has been approved, I believe for both sections to go ahead.
Torrens to Torrens should be well underway next year.
Torrens to Torrens should be well underway next year.
[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor
not being an engineer, will they we able to include in the project aspects that make the future rail works cheaper or at least not as intensive as the freeway duplication.
regardless, it is a great outcome from the state - we now need to get some projects or job creation ideas ready for 2018/2019.
regardless, it is a great outcome from the state - we now need to get some projects or job creation ideas ready for 2018/2019.
[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor
This concept plan moves the southern expressway lights to the junction with south road and aylifffs road witha right hand turn onto southbound expressway still under sturt and flinders drive but no flyover for southbound
[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor
Where can we see the new concept plan?
The article says the new intersection is just short of Daws Rd.
The article says the new intersection is just short of Daws Rd.
[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor
Dpti website shows concept plans as of 9.30 this morning
[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor
I can't find anything that shows the northern end of this, where the in-trench freeway joins the at-grade South Road. No maps, and it's not included in the fly-through. Anybody know?
cheers,
Rhino
Rhino
- SouthAussie94
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 589
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:03 pm
- Location: Southern Suburbs
[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor
Is there any more shots of the southern end of this?
It appears as if north bound South Road will still have traffic lights at the present day SEXY intersection so that south bound South Road traffic can enter the SEXY. The previous plan had an overpass.
Details of the northern end are a bit vague as well..
It appears as if north bound South Road will still have traffic lights at the present day SEXY intersection so that south bound South Road traffic can enter the SEXY. The previous plan had an overpass.
Details of the northern end are a bit vague as well..
"All we are is bags of bones pushing against a self imposed tide. Just be content with staying alive"
Views and opinions expressed are my own and don't necessarily reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation
Views and opinions expressed are my own and don't necessarily reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation
[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor
I'm also struggling to understand the interchange at the expressway, possibly the trench leads straight into the expressway at the current junction in both directions, while the at grade road joins it at the Marion Rd interchange?
[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor
Dog's breakfast! So no exit/entry for Sheps/Sturt?
[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor
If you're coming from the south, you will get off the freeway at Flinders Drive and utilise the at-grade South Road to reach Sturt Rd / Shepherds Hill Rd. The exit is at Flinders Drive to enable a speedier entry to Flinders Medical Centre for emergencies, I imagine.fifty wrote:Dog's breakfast! So no exit/entry for Sheps/Sturt?
Coming from the north, you will stay on the at-grade South Rd at the freeway access point that isn't shown anywhere in the documentation, until you reach Sturt Rd.
Simples.
cheers,
Rhino
Rhino
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests