On the public record you say? Then you should have no trouble providing us with this public record...claybro wrote:It is not a matter of "IF" the SDA opposes same sex marriage, it is apparently on public record that it does! Regardless of anyones opinion of this matter, I think we should all be alarmed these issues are even being discussed in the union forum. Unions need to stick to wages, conditions safety issues etc. for it's memebers, not social policies.Goya's Line wrote:If the SDA opposes gay marriage and has control over our state government (as claimed) how is it Jay Weathaerill was able to announce Labor would legislate for same-sex marriage at state level?
I don't doubt you(in fact I'm not that interested in the topic), but I think this thread is in need of more substance and facts.
You know, if you disagree with what some union is discussing, you are always able to get into one of the professions they represent and become a member of said union and then lobby your union rep to have those sorts of discussions stopped.