Sensational-Adelaide.com

Wilfy 2007 wrote: crawf,
Yes you are right it is bloody disgraceful, if fact i find it absolutely appalling that the SA government expect the public to use a Station like this.
For 50 and a half years I lived in South Australia and now I live on the Central Coast of NSW. Rail infastructure in SA needs to be on the same level as Sydney's Infastructure expansion. They proved that they can do it with the Mawson Lakes Interchange. My only complaint is that they have made the platform that goes to the City first class but the platform to Salisbury is not.

I am a firm believer of improving the Railcar services in Adelaide and the infastructure work has to be hand in hand with the improvements of the rollingstock, you cannot have one with out the other.

When the Oaklands Interchange is done then the Government needs to work on another. Perhaps it is time to re-introduce services to Northfield and further out on that line.

The question is, will the Government spend the money.

Regards,
Brian Leedham.

A significant portion of spending on rail infrastructure in Sydney revolves around fixing capacity constraints that currently exist on the CityRail system through a program called Clearways. It is important that existing constraints or potential ones be dealt with first before expanding on the network, otherwise the potential capacity of new links remains below what it could be. This is an issue that has been bugging the CityRail network since the mid 20th century, lots of new lines have been built into new areas without upgrading the capacity of existing corridors, hence the limited capacity and knock-on effects of delays occurring. Before Adelaide's rail network expands, some of the potential capacity limitations that should be dealt with include the limited capacity at Adelaide Station for terminating trains, trains conflicting paths at junctions such as Goodwood and additional tracks on some of the rail corridors (Belair line in particular).

There are some expansions occurring on the CityRail system of course, the most current example being the Chatswood to Epping link in northern Sydney. There is also the planned north-western and south-western expansions, which will follow on from the quadriplication of the existing East Hills Line.

I wonder if in 10-15 years time the SA government will be sued by the idiots who stole/broke the asbestos for getting Asbestosis

Shuz wrote:The roof structure appears very interesting. A vast improvement to the old station. I just wish this would hurry along already.

I saw the steel roof support in position before Christmas - went back today expecting it to be nearly complete, and the support had
gone. Probably no point erecting it before the platform is paved, but the kerbing & road base for the bus interchange is coming
along. Should be in use by next Christmas.

Those photos unfortunately represent a third world standard for Adelaide.
It goes to show how bad the rail network is.

Paulns wrote:Those photos unfortunately represent a third world standard for Adelaide.
It goes to show how bad the rail network is.

No it shows a government that is being clever with money. Why spend money on a station in which isn't going to be used any more. It's a waste of money and people power to fix it, this giving the government more money to spend on a modern interchange instead.

Third world standard, what a load of you know what. If it was a thrid world standard there wouldn't even be a roof.

kymbosa wrote:Third world standard, what a load of you know what. If it was a thrid world standard there wouldn't even be a roof.

I agree. What's with everyone using this term ' third world standards' in a developed country like australia. Third world standards is like in india, where everyone rides on the roof of trains.

Paulns wrote:Those photos unfortunately represent a third world standard for Adelaide.
It goes to show how bad the rail network is.

Probably not quite the right term for that, but I understand what you mean. India is a developing country and some of it's cities have some of the best rail systems in the world.

kymbosa wrote:Third world standard, what a load of you know what. If it was a thrid world standard there wouldn't even be a roof.

Plenty of other stops that don't have roofs.

frank1 wrote:I agree. What's with everyone using this term ' third world standards' in a developed country like australia.

Because the stations are in an appalling condition for a a wealthy, first-world country like Australia. We should demand, and accept, nothing less than the best.

Bulldozer wrote:

kymbosa wrote:Third world standard, what a load of you know what. If it was a thrid world standard there wouldn't even be a roof.

Plenty of other stops that don't have roofs.

frank1 wrote:I agree. What's with everyone using this term ' third world standards' in a developed country like australia.

Because the stations are in an appalling condition for a a wealthy, first-world country like Australia. We should demand, and accept, nothing less than the best.

Yeah and that's what we are getting at Oaklands Park a first world station.

Anyone know where the second world is??

ReallyBad wrote:Anyone know where the second world is??

Developed nations are "first world," communist states are "second world" and developing nations are "third world."

Today, the political correct terms are developed and developing world.

AG wrote:

Paulns wrote:Those photos unfortunately represent a third world standard for Adelaide.
It goes to show how bad the rail network is.

Probably not quite the right term for that, but I understand what you mean. India is a developing country and some of it's cities have some of the best rail systems in the world.

You obviously haven't heard the saying "India is the only place where you can run faster than the train"

Trains in a bangkok market: this is third world

The trains look similar to our Jumbos

What the hell? Thats just insane, markets in the middle of a train line. It's like they don't care about safety at all!