Adelaide's Premier Development and Construction Site
https://mail.sensational-adelaide.com/forum/
https://mail.sensational-adelaide.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1419
It features major works in the north of the Square, with a new "water play area", an event stage, public lawn space, cafe, trees and sheltered walking spaces.
So two new cafe's in the space of 100-200m, within walking distance of countless other cafes. Why?!?A second cafe is to be built by the tram stop in the square's south, near where the fountain would be relocated.
Victoria Square Gets Green Light
Released: 05/06/2012
Adelaide City Council has endorsed $24 million in funding from its own budget over the next two financial years to begin rejuvenating Victoria Square / Tarndanyangga.
The funding includes $23m investment in the Square plus up to $1m for suitable pedestrian and cyclist improvement initiatives around the corners.
“This is an historic day for the City of Adelaide – we have pushed for so long to make the Victoria Square redevelopment happen and it’s a great feeling to know we have finally started,” Lord Mayor Stephen Yarwood said.
“After 40 years and five plans, this is a significant milestone worthy of celebrating.
“Council’s investment will help attract additional people to the Square, increase activity and provide support to the tram service and regular, programmed events.
“It will also enable Council to collaborate with retailers and community organisations interested in operating from the Square.
“We have listened to community feedback from the Picture Adelaide campaign, Splash Adelaide and the draft Business Plan & Budget and an overall theme is more activities and upgrades to our squares and public spaces.
“The community wants it to happen, the city needs it to happen and I am proud to be part of a progressive Council that has decided to make it a reality.”
The funding will enable a large event space and stage in the northern end of the Square for 5,000 to 7,000 plus an upgrade of the central roadway to be transformed into a plaza for large events. A generous promenade with seating terraces and shelter will also be provided as well as shaded walkways, furniture, a water play feature and landscaping, with tree and garden beds.
A café will be installed near the event lawn and a café / kiosk will be also put in the southern end near the tram stop.
The recently state heritage listed Three Rivers Fountain and Queen Victoria statue will be refurbished and relocated within the Square.
Other features of the original Master Plan including a tram line and road reconfiguration, a large urban garden and the proposed Kaurna Culture Centre will be staged as further funding becomes available.
“The upgrade will generate jobs and create economic benefit to the local area, greater metropolitan Adelaide and South Australia,” Stephen said.
Deputy Lord Mayor David Plumridge said the timing is right for the city.
“It will help attract people into the centre of the city and will bring increased business to other precincts, including Gouger Street,” David said.
Adelaide City Council CEO Peter Smith said that now funding had been approved, work on the contract documentation and procurement process will begin straight away.
“Construction is expected to start early next year and will finish by December next year for use by Tour Down Under in January 2014.
“We will still need to deliver the project in stages but this initial funding will mean we will start to see some tangible outcomes over the coming two years that will transform the Square into an accessible, lively and people-focused space,” Peter said.
“It will provide immediate community value and improve amenity.”
Ben Yates, General Manager of Aspen Developments said, “The nearby open space of Victoria Square is a very important ingredient in the amenity enjoyed by those working, living or just passing through the city and our own development Precinct.
“We are delighted that the Council has approved funding that will create a vibrant, cultural and active space and garden in the heart of the city for today and future generations.”
Chair of the new Central Market Authority, Judy Potter, said “The investment in Victoria Square is exciting for Adelaide and the Central Market. Victoria Square will become the 'hub', bringing more people to the precinct and our iconic market."
For updates throughout the project and further information on the Victoria Square Masterplan visit http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/deve ... danyangga/
Those areas are already having huge sums of money spent on them. This isn't a zero sum game. All areas of the city matter and Victoria Square matters far more than you seem to believe.SouthAussie94 wrote:Why not spend a few million doing up the Square, and then perhaps spend the rest either in Rundle Mall or the Riverbank? Both of these are closer to the 'central' areas of the city which attract the largest numbers of people. Surely money would be best spent in these areas, upgrading areas which people ALREADY go to?
I don't think there's any argument for that; the 'they' in this situation are already here and more are coming. Look at the increasing development in the vicinity of the Square. But people aren't going to make use of a inhospitable space.To those saying "Build it and they will come", have a look at this: http://www.sensational-adelaide.com/for ... =18&t=3995
SRW wrote:So long as its a step along the way to achieving the complete master plan, I'm happy. Although, I almost wish they'd gone for the option of realigning the square now to reduce wastage when it comes to filling in the spaces.
will celebrate when I see a spade in the ground/dirt being moved etc.Waewick wrote:sounds like we have movement at the station.
looking good though+2. my sentiments exactly. Hopefully no need to rip up any of this 1st stage work on the way to the overall master plancrawf wrote:Great news. But I agree with the below commentSRW wrote:So long as its a step along the way to achieving the complete master plan, I'm happy. Although, I almost wish they'd gone for the option of realigning the square now to reduce wastage when it comes to filling in the spaces.
Looking at the two plans, the only things that look like they would be removed are the two short shaded walkways (replaced by the large arbours), which I'm sure could easily be repurposed elsewhere.Wayno wrote:+2. my sentiments exactly. Hopefully no need to rip up any of this 1st stage work on the way to the overall master plancrawf wrote:Great news. But I agree with the below commentSRW wrote:So long as its a step along the way to achieving the complete master plan, I'm happy. Although, I almost wish they'd gone for the option of realigning the square now to reduce wastage when it comes to filling in the spaces.
its all about drumming up business for the building industry chiefAdelaideAlive wrote:So now we have victoria square, elder park and festival square all jossling for ,markets, concerts,etc,etc.can someone now tell me what the purpose of festival square will now be for cause im confused,were supposed to be attractacting people to the riverbank precinct but now were dividing the city with an event tug of war between 3 places,got me totally confused,not that im against an upgrade but why does it need to be a place thats fighting with other areas of the city for events
not fighting - complementing, providing options, creating destinations...AdelaideAlive wrote:why does it need to be a place thats fighting with other areas of the city for events
This is one of my major issues with the redevelopment.rhino wrote: The State Government says "We're going to build a big event space on the Riverbank, somewhere where all Adelaidians can go to relax, watch a concert, attend a big event ..."
So Adelaide City Council says "We're going to build a big event space in Victoria Square, somewhere where all Adelaidians can go to relax, watch a concert, attend a big event ..."
Although remember, some of the no votes were by councillors that would have voted no regardless of the plan or conditions (no need to name the obvious names).SouthAussie94 wrote:And correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't the vote only one by 1 vote? (5-6 if I'm not mistaken). This shows that even the councillors aren't quite convinced about the need for the redevelopment.