[COM] Rundle Mall Redevelopment | $30m
[COM] Re: Rundle Mall Redevelopment | $30m
Relax people.
Just quietly i don't understand all the love for fed square period. I think it's a concrete jungle with no architectural merit and is lifeless a majority of the time. I assume contrary to what most think. And I highly rate Melbourne CBD culture
I think as long as the lighting serves it's purpose at night giving sufficient and effective lighting it might be worth the compromise on the day time aesthetics.
Just quietly i don't understand all the love for fed square period. I think it's a concrete jungle with no architectural merit and is lifeless a majority of the time. I assume contrary to what most think. And I highly rate Melbourne CBD culture
I think as long as the lighting serves it's purpose at night giving sufficient and effective lighting it might be worth the compromise on the day time aesthetics.
[COM] Re: Rundle Mall Redevelopment | $30m
I don't think I've ever seen it "lifeless" to be fair. Even when there isn't an event on, there are still plenty of people spilling into it from the surrounding bars/offices/museums, etc.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[COM] Re: Rundle Mall Redevelopment | $30m
The remaining 2 poles were erected last night. there are now 4 in total. The ones near rundle mall appear to be ahhh "ribbed for her pleasure"..
In other news the "Ginger" Rundle mall mascot is dead and they will be starting new branding shortly. I walked past an event this morning in Lindes Lanes which was invite only and had posters "What is being unwrapped in the mall". Not sure if related or maybe something to do with a new store.
In other news the "Ginger" Rundle mall mascot is dead and they will be starting new branding shortly. I walked past an event this morning in Lindes Lanes which was invite only and had posters "What is being unwrapped in the mall". Not sure if related or maybe something to do with a new store.
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
[COM] Re: Rundle Mall Redevelopment | $30m
I snapped a quick pic as I was walking past this morning...
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
[COM] Re: Rundle Mall Redevelopment | $30m
Okay second attempt:
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
[COM] Re: Rundle Mall Redevelopment | $30m
Yeah, they fucked this one up big time with the poles and lighting system.
Massively disappointed. It's a let down to what has otherwise been a stellar improvement to the area.
Massively disappointed. It's a let down to what has otherwise been a stellar improvement to the area.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
[COM] Re: Rundle Mall Redevelopment | $30m
Brail for 'look out there's a ghastly pole standing in your way?'monotonehell wrote:Okay second attempt:
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
[COM] Re: Rundle Mall Redevelopment | $30m
Well it's close. The bit I can see would read as eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeea.Wayno wrote:Braile for 'look out there's a ghastly pole standing in your way?'
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
[COM] Re: Rundle Mall Redevelopment | $30m
So 6 weeks since the poles went up and nothing since. The council needs to pull their head out of their ***. Our "premier" shopping precinct has not had permanent lighting for coming up to 2 and a half years now. Nowhere else in the world would this happen. Sort it out.
-
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2583
- Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
- Location: Adelaide CBD, SA
[COM] Re: Rundle Mall Redevelopment | $30m
+1. Also begs the question as to why the poles are required? I noticed they've put support bolts on a majority of the mall's buildings, why are the poles still necessary??Ben wrote:So 6 weeks since the poles went up and nothing since. The council needs to pull their head out of their ***. Our "premier" shopping precinct has not had permanent lighting for coming up to 2 and a half years now. Nowhere else in the world would this happen. Sort it out.
- ChillyPhilly
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2780
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: Kaurna Land.
- Contact:
[COM] Re: Rundle Mall Redevelopment | $30m
Hopefully they prove superfluous then.Patrick_27 wrote:+1. Also begs the question as to why the poles are required? I noticed they've put support bolts on a majority of the mall's buildings, why are the poles still necessary??Ben wrote:So 6 weeks since the poles went up and nothing since. The council needs to pull their head out of their ***. Our "premier" shopping precinct has not had permanent lighting for coming up to 2 and a half years now. Nowhere else in the world would this happen. Sort it out.
Our state, our city, our future.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
-
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:26 am
[COM] Re: Rundle Mall Redevelopment | $30m
I heard from someone (who has a business is in the mall) that it was the building owners who wouldn't allow the support brackets/bolts/catenary lightning to be put onto their buildings that the engineers had to resort to putting up these poles to support the catenary lighting. Also supposed to be up/working in August.
[COM] Re: Rundle Mall Redevelopment | $30m
Meanwhile on Bank St some kind of similar catenary lights have been put up in the last few weeks.
[COM] Re: Rundle Mall Redevelopment | $30m
heard the same thing from people in the building services industry. It appears whilst in principle agreement was given, that changed.how good is he wrote:I heard from someone (who has a business is in the mall) that it was the building owners who wouldn't allow the support brackets/bolts/catenary lightning to be put onto their buildings that the engineers had to resort to putting up these poles to support the catenary lighting. Also supposed to be up/working in August.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Spotto and 6 guests