ONH: [Gilberton] 45 Park | 35m | 10lvls | Residential

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in areas other than the CBD and North Adelaide. Includes Port Adelaide and Glenelg.
Message
Author
User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: #SWP: 45 Park - Gilberton - $180 million

#121 Post by monotonehell » Wed May 30, 2012 7:22 pm

O’Connor said he feared sales interest in 45 Park, which went on the market earlier this year, would fall away because buyers would be unwilling to pay stamp duty that was not required in the CBD.
...
“At the end of the day the people we’re targeting are owner-occupiers who won’t go into the city to live, but who will buy property in our location before the city because it’s a car dependent backwater location. So that’s the area we’re going to hurt on.”
There I fixed it for him.

What's vastly superior about it? No real close by services within walking distance, other than the pub.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

Aidan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2148
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:10 am
Location: Christies Beach

#SWP: 45 Park - Gilberton - $180 million

#122 Post by Aidan » Wed May 30, 2012 9:51 pm

monotonehell wrote:
O’Connor said he feared sales interest in 45 Park, which went on the market earlier this year, would fall away because buyers would be unwilling to pay stamp duty that was not required in the CBD.
...
“At the end of the day the people we’re targeting are owner-occupiers who won’t go into the city to live, but who will buy property in our location before the city because it’s a car dependent backwater location. So that’s the area we’re going to hurt on.”
There I fixed it for him.

What's vastly superior about it? No real close by services within walking distance, other than the pub.
Walkscore gives it a rating of 73%. You seem to have forgotten how much of Melbourne Street is within walking distance.

As for what's superior about it, proximity ti the river is one obvious drawcard.
Just build it wrote:Bye Union Hall. I'll see you in another life, when we are both cats.

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: #SWP: 45 Park - Gilberton - $180 million

#123 Post by monotonehell » Wed May 30, 2012 10:44 pm

Aidan wrote:Walkscore gives it a rating of 73%. You seem to have forgotten how much of Melbourne Street is within walking distance.

As for what's superior about it, proximity ti the river is one obvious drawcard.
Wrong side of Hackney Road, without a car it would be difficult. I have a friend who lives just behind that in Rose street. Public transport is difficult there as you have to deal with the main road, and not many actual services that stop. If they do they are full. The walk to the stop is not sheltered and you have to cross a lot of traffic (including the busway's output) to get to the stops. There's no grocery stores within a reasonable walk. Closest is the IGA on Melbourne street. I looked into living with him, but it was just too isolated without a car.

My house has a walk score of 98% :D
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5521
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #SWP: 45 Park - Gilberton - $180 million

#124 Post by crawf » Thu May 31, 2012 1:45 am

Mine - 93% :)

ghs
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1725
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:09 am
Location: Brighton

Re: #SWP: 45 Park - Gilberton - $180 million

#125 Post by ghs » Thu May 31, 2012 4:09 pm

It will be interesting to see if the prices of these apartments come down in price as a result of all
of this.

User avatar
Omicron
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2336
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm

Re: #SWP: 45 Park - Gilberton - $180 million

#126 Post by Omicron » Thu May 31, 2012 9:23 pm

monotonehell wrote:
O’Connor said he feared sales interest in 45 Park, which went on the market earlier this year, would fall away because buyers would be unwilling to pay stamp duty that was not required in the CBD.
...
“At the end of the day the people we’re targeting are owner-occupiers who won’t go into the city to live, but who will buy property in our location before the city because it’s a car dependent backwater location. So that’s the area we’re going to hurt on.”
There I fixed it for him.

What's vastly superior about it? No real close by services within walking distance, other than the pub.
I fail to see the issue here.

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: #SWP: 45 Park - Gilberton - $180 million

#127 Post by monotonehell » Thu May 31, 2012 11:05 pm

Omicron wrote:I fail to see the issue here.
Have you been to the Hackney pub?

There's no Moet et Chandon and they have pokies...
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3783
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

Re: #SWP: 45 Park - Gilberton - $180 million

#128 Post by Waewick » Fri Jun 01, 2012 8:11 am

monotonehell wrote:
Omicron wrote:I fail to see the issue here.
Have you been to the Hackney pub?

There's no Moet et Chandon and they have pokies...
I know this isn't the thread but.

by issue with this kind is statement is what are pubs and clubs meant to do to supplement their income? Inner city pubs get smashed on all the council rates, land tax etc given the value of the sites.

people aren't winning to pay a decent margin on alcoholic products for the pleasure of sitting in a pub and being served beer and food.

so there is only really two options pubs have, get pokies or shut down.

peas_and_corn
Legendary Member!
Posts: 522
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 9:32 pm

Re: #SWP: 45 Park - Gilberton - $180 million

#129 Post by peas_and_corn » Fri Jun 01, 2012 3:17 pm

Oh please. There are enough pubs without pokies to show that it's a viable business plan.

flavze
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 126
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 11:38 am

Re: #SWP: 45 Park - Gilberton - $180 million

#130 Post by flavze » Fri Jun 01, 2012 10:35 pm

crawf wrote:Mine - 93% :)
mine is 3%. :|

User avatar
jk1237
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 1756
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:22 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #SWP: 45 Park - Gilberton - $180 million

#131 Post by jk1237 » Sat Jun 02, 2012 10:30 am

92% for me at St Peters :banana:

contractor
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 130
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 8:41 pm

Re: #SWP: 45 Park - Gilberton - $180 million

#132 Post by contractor » Sat Jun 02, 2012 1:54 pm

No sympathy for the developer.. they've had this block of land since 2004.

User avatar
The Scooter Guy
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1667
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 7:45 pm
Location: Anywhere!
Contact:

Re: #SWP: 45 Park - Gilberton - $180 million

#133 Post by The Scooter Guy » Tue Jun 05, 2012 5:28 pm

I've been passing that site on the buses for weeks & still no activity is going on.
For starters, my avatar is the well-known Adelaide Aquatic Centre insignia from 1989.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWk8YPx2zHziHgvyPy_9fxQ
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryanthescooterguy/
http://ryansbedroom.tumblr.com/

adamd
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2011 9:52 pm

Re: #SWP: 45 Park - Gilberton - $180 million

#134 Post by adamd » Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:15 pm

Poor interest in the site (2000 enquiries but only mid teen sales?) can now be blamed on the state government's stamp duty decision, not on the developments poor location (relative to everything people want / need) and potential over pricing.

ghs
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1725
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:09 am
Location: Brighton

Re: #SWP: 45 Park - Gilberton - $180 million

#135 Post by ghs » Wed Jun 13, 2012 3:54 pm

The apartments are also quite expensive.

$1.125m will get you a 3 bedroom apartment in this development.

For that much money you can buy a pretty good house. I think I'd rather have
a nice house.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 0 guests