News & Discussion: Other Transport Projects

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
ml69
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1005
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 11:16 pm
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: News & Discussion: Transport Projects

#466 Post by ml69 » Sat May 07, 2016 1:28 pm

GoodSmackUp wrote:
claybro wrote:You guys do all realise that once the OH line is dedicated as heavy rail only, you can say good bye to any hope of trams for port adelaide, west lakes , semaphore and quite likely the closure of the 4 stations that constitute the grange spur. The whole North West light rail to those areas was based on OH line being converted or duplicated as light rail. They will not have 2 separate systems once OH is upgraded as heavy rail only.
Light rail could feed passagers into a central Port Adelaide train station, Trams don't all have to be connected into the Adelaide CBD.
Spot on. Port Adelaide and Woodville stations should be designed as key interchange stations which a Semaphore, West Lakes and Grange tram line feed into. These two stations should also support feeder bus services.

Brucetiki
Legendary Member!
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:20 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Transport Projects

#467 Post by Brucetiki » Sat May 07, 2016 6:00 pm

Would consideration need to be given to coordinate the project with T2T. Not only to coordinate with the South Rd overpass but given Park Tce was upgraded so it could be an alternative route to South Rd, you would want to avoid any major roadworks on Park Tce until T2T is just about complete.

User avatar
Llessur2002
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2131
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
Location: Inner West

Re: News & Discussion: Transport Projects

#468 Post by Llessur2002 » Sat May 07, 2016 6:35 pm

Brucetiki wrote:Would consideration need to be given to coordinate the project with T2T. Not only to coordinate with the South Rd overpass but given Park Tce was upgraded so it could be an alternative route to South Rd, you would want to avoid any major roadworks on Park Tce until T2T is just about complete.
Hopefully this could occur at the end of the T2T surface road construction - excavating the sunken through road would presumably have little impact on the overall traffic flow at this stage. Granted traffic would still have to stop at intersections but it shouldn't be any different than the pre-T2T situation.

claybro
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2429
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:16 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Transport Projects

#469 Post by claybro » Sat May 07, 2016 9:16 pm

ml69 wrote:
GoodSmackUp wrote:
claybro wrote:You guys do all realise that once the OH line is dedicated as heavy rail only, you can say good bye to any hope of trams for port adelaide, west lakes , semaphore and quite likely the closure of the 4 stations that constitute the grange spur. The whole North West light rail to those areas was based on OH line being converted or duplicated as light rail. They will not have 2 separate systems once OH is upgraded as heavy rail only.
Light rail could feed passagers into a central Port Adelaide train station, Trams don't all have to be connected into the Adelaide CBD.
Spot on. Port Adelaide and Woodville stations should be designed as key interchange stations which a Semaphore, West Lakes and Grange tram line feed into. These two stations should also support feeder bus services.
conversion to light rail of OH line would naturally create the possibility and public pressure to extend the services to surrounding suburbs. ( remembering Adelaides love of single seat journeys. ) If OH is heavy rail, that prospect will not exist, and the best you will get is buses feeding into interchanges, with the most likely first site Woodville, as it captures west lakes grange Woodville , woodville North etc. Rail to rail interchange would create an unnecessary expense for no real gain.

EBG
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3101
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:49 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Transport Projects

#470 Post by EBG » Sat May 07, 2016 9:32 pm

I don't know why the electrification of the Gawler line is not shovel ready enough to be part of last weeks Federal budget, after all it was supposed to be completed in 20013.
The only reason I can see is that the State government does not have the funds to cover its contribution for this project.

User avatar
metro
Legendary Member!
Posts: 970
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: News & Discussion: Transport Projects

#471 Post by metro » Sat May 07, 2016 11:29 pm

EBG wrote:I don't know why the electrification of the Gawler line is not shovel ready enough to be part of last weeks Federal budget, after all it was supposed to be completed in 20013.
The only reason I can see is that the State government does not have the funds to cover its contribution for this project.
Gawler electrification has gone past the shovel-ready stage, it has already started with most station rebuilds and overhead poles already up between Gawler and Salisbury. If it were a road project like T2T it would be like stopping works on South Road right now and leaving it all as it is for over 3 years and then proposing only half of the works might resume before the end of the decade. :roll:

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6488
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Transport Projects

#472 Post by Norman » Sat May 07, 2016 11:36 pm

Adelaide Airport has finally expanded its international screening point to two scanners. Hopefully this will solve the bottlenecks this section gets during peak times.
Attachments
WP_20160507_16_39_29_Rich.jpg
WP_20160507_16_39_29_Rich.jpg (325.61 KiB) Viewed 4315 times

Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2556
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

Re: News & Discussion: Transport Projects

#473 Post by Patrick_27 » Sat May 07, 2016 11:55 pm

ChillyPhilly wrote:
jk1237 wrote:not sure why they would move Bowden Station east towards Park Tce. No one lives in the parklands, and no one takes a train to the parklands. Id leave the station where it is because it will be in the middle of the Bowden midrise apartments in the next few years, and is closer to the Ent Centre/Hindmarsh Stadium etc
Not only that, but there's the less-utilised-but-still-used North Adelaide station a matter of metres away.

The original plan of a significant stretch of the rail line, along with Bowden station, both being underground remains far superior.
Why is this even a question? They're shifting it closer to Park Terrace to make the line more interchangeable.

User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: Transport Projects

#474 Post by ChillyPhilly » Sat May 07, 2016 11:58 pm

Patrick_27 wrote:
ChillyPhilly wrote:
jk1237 wrote:not sure why they would move Bowden Station east towards Park Tce. No one lives in the parklands, and no one takes a train to the parklands. Id leave the station where it is because it will be in the middle of the Bowden midrise apartments in the next few years, and is closer to the Ent Centre/Hindmarsh Stadium etc
Not only that, but there's the less-utilised-but-still-used North Adelaide station a matter of metres away.

The original plan of a significant stretch of the rail line, along with Bowden station, both being underground remains far superior.
Why is this even a question? They're shifting it closer to Park Terrace to make the line more interchangeable.
I didn't think its purpose as per the Bowden Urban Village was to be interchangeable. The Bowden station as it is already has some interchangeable qualities about it: the tram, North Adelaide station and buses on Port Road.
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2556
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

Re: News & Discussion: Transport Projects

#475 Post by Patrick_27 » Sun May 08, 2016 12:11 am

GoodSmackUp wrote:IMO They should go all out and put the entire OH line in a trench
Like tunnelling this sector of the OH line, what good reason is there for trenching the line?

Tunnelling this section of line is a stupid and unnecessary expense all in the name of aesthetics. Go anywhere else in Australia and you'll find that they trai lines running through some of their nicest suburbs in open cut trenches.

Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2556
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

Re: News & Discussion: Transport Projects

#476 Post by Patrick_27 » Sun May 08, 2016 12:21 am

ChillyPhilly wrote:I didn't think its purpose as per the Bowden Urban Village was to be interchangeable. The Bowden station as it is already has some interchangeable qualities about it: the tram, North Adelaide station and buses on Port Road.
Perhaps it wasn't from an urban planning point of view, but for the people designing this project they were likely to see the logic in adding another interchangeable quality onto the ones you've just mentioned. By situating it closer to Park Terrace they can now catch buses heading east towards M/N Road and N/E Road and west towards South Road, there is quite a large small-business district that operates along these corridors.

claybro
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2429
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:16 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Transport Projects

#477 Post by claybro » Sun May 08, 2016 3:11 pm

Ok I'm confused. What bus runs past park terrace crossing on to main North and/ or northeast road?

User avatar
PeFe
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1677
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:47 am

Re: News & Discussion: Transport Projects

#478 Post by PeFe » Sun May 08, 2016 3:58 pm

claybro wrote:Ok I'm confused. What bus runs past park terrace crossing on to main North and/ or northeast road?
I am confused too......

Bowden Station functions as a train station like this....
1) services local residents/commuters (there are a few offices nearby)
2) services Entertainment Centre
3) services Coopers Stadium

Why move it? For what purpose? No-one wants to interchange to a bus on Park Terrace, the North Adelaide railway station is effectively all but closed..

Bowden Station should be rebuilt where it is as a showpiece tod station. A template for future developments around train stations.
Get it right now !

claybro
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2429
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:16 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Transport Projects

#479 Post by claybro » Sun May 08, 2016 6:39 pm

It seems to me, keeping OH as heavy rail creates as many problems as does changing it all to light rail. Changing to light rail would negate the need to underground any section thru Bowden, as light rail creates no where near the barrier of the heavy rail line. Look at how the tram runs seamlessly thru the lawn on vic square. They are much quieter too. Better for dense urban developments. Light rail of the whole corridor would also eliminate a clumsy rail to rail interchange (assuming the port/ west lakes area ever gets light rail once OH is upgraded in its original heavy rail format. Same for the situation with west lakes, where there is no perceivable way heavy rail will go down the boulevard to west lakes mall, or heavy rail down semaphore road ever again. Light rail is just far more versatile and flexible, and with the underpass of the freight line in the parklands, and direct route into the city, should not be much slower either.

thecityguy
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 197
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2015 2:32 am

Re: News & Discussion: Transport Projects

#480 Post by thecityguy » Sun May 08, 2016 9:16 pm

Couldn't agree more with clay, light rail going through suburbs actually makes the area attractive, heavy rail is ugly and unappealing. To me light rail is a no brainer. No one wants to be swapping between heavy and light rail


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests