Climate change
Re: Climate change
Climate change aside, much more can be done toward the greening of most cities. I for one would be happy if our open space was in fact ... green. Most efforts toward greening in Adelaide in the last decade seem to involve planting dead native grasses and mallee scrub, all a known fire hazard and completely unsuited to an urban environment. I can't decide if it is just laziness, or polilical correctness gone mad.
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
Re: Climate change
wtf does political correctness have to do with it?claybro wrote:Climate change aside, much more can be done toward the greening of most cities. I for one would be happy if our open space was in fact ... green. Most efforts toward greening in Adelaide in the last decade seem to involve planting dead native grasses and mallee scrub, all a known fire hazard and completely unsuited to an urban environment. I can't decide if it is just laziness, or polilical correctness gone mad.
I think it's council bean counters trying to appear to be water wise by planting climate appropriate plants, but the real reason is they don't want to spend money on maintenance and watering.
It's like those signs small mall operators put up in front of their escalators saying that the escalators will be turned off outside of shopping hours, please use the stairs / lift elsewhere, and "thank you for helping us help the environment" when the real reason is they are trying to scrimp pennies on the power bill.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
-
- Gold-Member ;)
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 6:39 pm
Re: Climate change
And hotels requesting you to be environmentally conscious by re-using your towels...monotonehell wrote:wtf does political correctness have to do with it?claybro wrote:Climate change aside, much more can be done toward the greening of most cities. I for one would be happy if our open space was in fact ... green. Most efforts toward greening in Adelaide in the last decade seem to involve planting dead native grasses and mallee scrub, all a known fire hazard and completely unsuited to an urban environment. I can't decide if it is just laziness, or polilical correctness gone mad.
I think it's council bean counters trying to appear to be water wise by planting climate appropriate plants, but the real reason is they don't want to spend money on maintenance and watering.
It's like those signs small mall operators put up in front of their escalators saying that the escalators will be turned off outside of shopping hours, please use the stairs / lift elsewhere, and "thank you for helping us help the environment" when the real reason is they are trying to scrimp pennies on the power bill.
Unfortunately the flight you took to your holiday destination probably emitted more pollution into the atmosphere for a whole life's worth of hotel towel washing
Re: Climate change
Sorry, should have clarified. It is the APPEARANCE of being politically correct whilst the main motivation is saving money as you say. Climate change is being used by all sorts of organisations as an excuse to charge extra, or reduce services in just about every area of operation now.monotonehell wrote:wtf does political correctness have to do with it?claybro wrote:Climate change aside, much more can be done toward the greening of most cities. I for one would be happy if our open space was in fact ... green. Most efforts toward greening in Adelaide in the last decade seem to involve planting dead native grasses and mallee scrub, all a known fire hazard and completely unsuited to an urban environment. I can't decide if it is just laziness, or polilical correctness gone mad.
I think it's council bean counters trying to appear to be water wise by planting climate appropriate plants, but the real reason is they don't want to spend money on maintenance and watering.
It's like those signs small mall operators put up in front of their escalators saying that the escalators will be turned off outside of shopping hours, please use the stairs / lift elsewhere, and "thank you for helping us help the environment" when the real reason is they are trying to scrimp pennies on the power bill.
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
Re: Climate change
Righto, I see. I think that might qualify as 'green washing' ?claybro wrote:Sorry, should have clarified. It is the APPEARANCE of being politically correct whilst the main motivation is saving money as you say. Climate change is being used by all sorts of organisations as an excuse to charge extra, or reduce services in just about every area of operation now.monotonehell wrote:wtf does political correctness have to do with it?claybro wrote:Climate change aside, much more can be done toward the greening of most cities. I for one would be happy if our open space was in fact ... green. Most efforts toward greening in Adelaide in the last decade seem to involve planting dead native grasses and mallee scrub, all a known fire hazard and completely unsuited to an urban environment. I can't decide if it is just laziness, or polilical correctness gone mad.
I think it's council bean counters trying to appear to be water wise by planting climate appropriate plants, but the real reason is they don't want to spend money on maintenance and watering.
It's like those signs small mall operators put up in front of their escalators saying that the escalators will be turned off outside of shopping hours, please use the stairs / lift elsewhere, and "thank you for helping us help the environment" when the real reason is they are trying to scrimp pennies on the power bill.
...
Actually the Wikipedia page has a picture of a hotel laundry card like realstretts noted above.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenwashing
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
Re: Climate change
I think Claybro has a point about political correctness. I recall reading somewhere that the current philosophy, guiding design principles of the public realm dictates that we embrace "native" and "indigenous" concepts. Hence, the rejection of foreign plants in favour of native varieties. This in turn makes parts of the city look like scrubland.monotonehell wrote:wtf does political correctness have to do with it?claybro wrote:Climate change aside, much more can be done toward the greening of most cities. I for one would be happy if our open space was in fact ... green. Most efforts toward greening in Adelaide in the last decade seem to involve planting dead native grasses and mallee scrub, all a known fire hazard and completely unsuited to an urban environment. I can't decide if it is just laziness, or polilical correctness gone mad.
I think it's council bean counters trying to appear to be water wise by planting climate appropriate plants, but the real reason is they don't want to spend money on maintenance and watering.
It's like those signs small mall operators put up in front of their escalators saying that the escalators will be turned off outside of shopping hours, please use the stairs / lift elsewhere, and "thank you for helping us help the environment" when the real reason is they are trying to scrimp pennies on the power bill.
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
Re: Climate change
Is that guiding principle actually attributed to being water-wise, pandering to indigenous Australians or both?Will wrote:I think Claybro has a point about political correctness. I recall reading somewhere that the current philosophy, guiding design principles of the public realm dictates that we embrace "native" and "indigenous" concepts. Hence, the rejection of foreign plants in favour of native varieties. This in turn makes parts of the city look like scrubland.monotonehell wrote:wtf does political correctness have to do with it?claybro wrote:Climate change aside, much more can be done toward the greening of most cities. I for one would be happy if our open space was in fact ... green. Most efforts toward greening in Adelaide in the last decade seem to involve planting dead native grasses and mallee scrub, all a known fire hazard and completely unsuited to an urban environment. I can't decide if it is just laziness, or polilical correctness gone mad.
I think it's council bean counters trying to appear to be water wise by planting climate appropriate plants, but the real reason is they don't want to spend money on maintenance and watering.
It's like those signs small mall operators put up in front of their escalators saying that the escalators will be turned off outside of shopping hours, please use the stairs / lift elsewhere, and "thank you for helping us help the environment" when the real reason is they are trying to scrimp pennies on the power bill.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
Re: Climate change
Water wise?
They use recycled waste water to water the parklands now. Even out into parts of the suburbs.
If you see a purple hose, or purple tap, or purple plastic "manhole cover" in the parklands, that's recycled waste water.
It shouldn't matter anymore if it's native plants or introduced plants, the water supply is there.
We also have a desal plant just sitting there collecting dust. That thing should have been turned on and supplying metropolitan Adelaide with water, and our reliance on the Murray should have started to be reduced year by year.
What's going to save the Murray? Wasting time on political nonsense like water license buy back schemes and funny new ways to waste tax payers money, or reducing how much water we drain out of the bloody Murray River?
You could give many of the problems our state and country faces to a group of primary school children, and they'd come up with solutions quicker then our politicians who are earning hundreds of thousands of our tax payer dollars each every year to do the same.
They use recycled waste water to water the parklands now. Even out into parts of the suburbs.
If you see a purple hose, or purple tap, or purple plastic "manhole cover" in the parklands, that's recycled waste water.
It shouldn't matter anymore if it's native plants or introduced plants, the water supply is there.
We also have a desal plant just sitting there collecting dust. That thing should have been turned on and supplying metropolitan Adelaide with water, and our reliance on the Murray should have started to be reduced year by year.
What's going to save the Murray? Wasting time on political nonsense like water license buy back schemes and funny new ways to waste tax payers money, or reducing how much water we drain out of the bloody Murray River?
You could give many of the problems our state and country faces to a group of primary school children, and they'd come up with solutions quicker then our politicians who are earning hundreds of thousands of our tax payer dollars each every year to do the same.
Re: Climate change
But would the solutions be politically correct Rev?- After all, political correctness overrides everything in public policy (or lack thereof) now.rev wrote:You could give many of the problems our state and country faces to a group of primary school children, and they'd come up with solutions quicker then our politicians who are earning hundreds of thousands of our tax payer dollars each every year to do the same.
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
Re: Climate change
The desal plant has never been turned off. In fact if they turned off the desal plant the osmosis system would break and require repair. The desal plant is currently running at about 1% capacity. As it does during non-drought periods by design.rev wrote:We also have a desal plant just sitting there collecting dust. That thing should have been turned on and supplying metropolitan Adelaide with water, and our reliance on the Murray should have started to be reduced year by year.
But yes, councils seem to be green-washing their penny pinching by not paying to water or maintain selected plantings - indigenous or otherwise.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
Re: Climate change
1% is 1GL. Which is what .5 of a percent of Adelaides water requirements given at full capacity it makes 100GL and supplies half of Adelaides needs. Or is my maths off at 4:30am?monotonehell wrote:The desal plant has never been turned off. In fact if they turned off the desal plant the osmosis system would break and require repair. The desal plant is currently running at about 1% capacity. As it does during non-drought periods by design.rev wrote:We also have a desal plant just sitting there collecting dust. That thing should have been turned on and supplying metropolitan Adelaide with water, and our reliance on the Murray should have started to be reduced year by year.
But yes, councils seem to be green-washing their penny pinching by not paying to water or maintain selected plantings - indigenous or otherwise.
It may as well be off in other words. You know what I meant.
Btw Mono you remind me of the bloke that hosts the late night segment on 5AA from midnight onwards.
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
Re: Climate change
My point was it's not collecting dust - it's running, continually costing money. But while the energy cost of pumping Murray water is less than the energy cost of desal AND while the Murray water is there to be pumped; it costs water users less to keep the desal in standby and pump the Murray dry.rev wrote:1% is 1GL. Which is what .5 of a percent of Adelaides water requirements given at full capacity it makes 100GL and supplies half of Adelaides needs. Or is my maths off at 4:30am?monotonehell wrote:The desal plant has never been turned off. In fact if they turned off the desal plant the osmosis system would break and require repair. The desal plant is currently running at about 1% capacity. As it does during non-drought periods by design.rev wrote:We also have a desal plant just sitting there collecting dust. That thing should have been turned on and supplying metropolitan Adelaide with water, and our reliance on the Murray should have started to be reduced year by year.
But yes, councils seem to be green-washing their penny pinching by not paying to water or maintain selected plantings - indigenous or otherwise.
It may as well be off in other words. You know what I meant.
Seeing how I have no idea who that is I have no idea how to take that.Btw Mono you remind me of the bloke that hosts the late night segment on 5AA from midnight onwards.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
Re: Climate change
It wasn't an insult. The guy has answers to almost everything callers bring up, like you do here.
Yes, but the water it is providing into the network is negligible overall. So if it was collecting dust, it wouldn't be a noticeable decrease.
Yes, but the water it is providing into the network is negligible overall. So if it was collecting dust, it wouldn't be a noticeable decrease.
Re: Climate change
10% aka 30megalitres/day aka over 5% of metro Adelaide typical requirements.monotonehell wrote:The desal plant is currently running at about 1% capacity.
https://www.sawater.com.au/community-an ... -plant-adp
https://www.sawater.com.au/community-an ... rvoir-data
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
Re: Climate change
Thanks bits, I had my decimal point in the wrong place!bits wrote:10% aka 30megalitres/day aka over 5% of metro Adelaide typical requirements.monotonehell wrote:The desal plant is currently running at about 1% capacity.
https://www.sawater.com.au/community-an ... -plant-adp
https://www.sawater.com.au/community-an ... rvoir-data
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 6 guests