[CAN] 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Yes, I didn't expect anyone to take that seriously.
It's safe to assume that the instant anyone knows of something like a rumour of 200m+ buildings in Adelaide there will be very active discussion of it.
It's safe to assume that the instant anyone knows of something like a rumour of 200m+ buildings in Adelaide there will be very active discussion of it.
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
I've done a rough mock up of the SA1 tower and freemasons from a different angle. Not to scale.
Also here is some interesting comments form the planning website....
Also here is some interesting comments form the planning website....
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Shame to see people wanting to hold Adelaide back. Really hoping this one goes up.
-
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2020 5:03 pm
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
If that guy doesn't like taller buildings, tell him to move to darwin. He'd be right at home
Also could you link that 'planning website' forum here please. I haven't seen it.
-
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2020 5:03 pm
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
If developers put the work in for the aviation planning, this development definitely paves the way for a 200m building. It's only a 20m increase from this development, definitely negotiable.brizzlar wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 5:50 pmGreat image.VinyTapestry849 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 10:42 amBut why are these (red/black lines) relevant when the actual flight paths are far north from these developments (shown below)Ho Really wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 1:02 amWas waiting for this news since December. CDJ gave us a hint for something then. A little disappointed not pushed to the 200 metre limit, but beggars can't be choosers. Anyhow back in December I put this image together to see what reaction it would get but never posted it. A bit of an anti climax now I guess. Anyhow let's enjoy the moment.
Cheers
Does anyone know if we're likely to see buildings get up to/past 200m or nah?
This is a truly pivotal point for progress in Adelaide. Very exciting times.
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Yeah, if this one gets approved, I would expect more developers to propose developments like this or possibly taller eventually.VinyTapestry849 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 25, 2022 7:36 pmIf developers put the work in for the aviation planning, this development definitely paves the way for a 200m building. It's only a 20m increase from this development, definitely negotiable.brizzlar wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 5:50 pmGreat image.VinyTapestry849 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 10:42 am
But why are these (red/black lines) relevant when the actual flight paths are far north from these developments (shown below)
Does anyone know if we're likely to see buildings get up to/past 200m or nah?
This is a truly pivotal point for progress in Adelaide. Very exciting times.
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
If this doesn't get approved, I'm moving haha
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
The posts on the planning website clearly written by one person, not sure if they had different accounts but the style of writing, exact same opening comment and use of '??' kind of gives it away. Also the idea that a 180m is 'twice' as tall as anything else... LOL. Real AdelaideNow level of commentary.
I don't doubt however that there are people that truly hold that view. I recall a group in Rundle Mall a few years back specifically attacking 'tall' buildings. It's kind of a thing for a certain type of person, some of whom lived near me when I lived in the south-west of the CBD. As far as I am aware, no-one is proposing or would be permitted to build 90m, let alone 180m buildings in the heavily 'residential' parts of the city.
As long as the ACC is out of the loop on approvals, this really comes down to if this can get funding in a pretty tough environment.
I don't doubt however that there are people that truly hold that view. I recall a group in Rundle Mall a few years back specifically attacking 'tall' buildings. It's kind of a thing for a certain type of person, some of whom lived near me when I lived in the south-west of the CBD. As far as I am aware, no-one is proposing or would be permitted to build 90m, let alone 180m buildings in the heavily 'residential' parts of the city.
As long as the ACC is out of the loop on approvals, this really comes down to if this can get funding in a pretty tough environment.
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Will found this photo on a real estate website and it seemed perfect for blocking in this developments scale. At this angle you can really see how it is going to dominate the area.
-
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 1:02 am
- Location: Adelaide (Hallett Cove)
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
absolutely, there's nothing significant in that part of the CBD. I'm assuming that these larger proposals will gradually start shifting further south.
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
The AAL response indicates that the top of the building will reach 227m AHD. The site I believe is around 45AHD plus or minus a few metres.
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
So pretty much the 180m mark, give or take a few metres. Super impressive! I can't wait to see the renders!
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
https://plan.sa.gov.au/development_appl ... 042343-DAP
The City of Adelaide response drops some interesting hints about the towers appearance.
Also it's nice to see this in writing:
The City of Adelaide response drops some interesting hints about the towers appearance.
Also it's nice to see this in writing:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 5 guests