[PRO] Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in areas other than the CBD and North Adelaide. Includes Port Adelaide and Glenelg.
Message
Author
User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2764
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#16 Post by ChillyPhilly » Thu Mar 07, 2024 1:20 pm

gnrc_louis wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 12:36 pm
This got rejected. Another win for the NIMBY morons.
SCAP slammed it: https://www.saplanningcommission.sa.gov ... eeting.pdf
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

dsriggs
Legendary Member!
Posts: 522
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:18 am

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#17 Post by dsriggs » Thu Mar 07, 2024 4:51 pm

dsriggs wrote:
Fri Sep 08, 2023 9:22 pm
Great idea, great location right near the edge of the city, nice use of the old hotel.

Watch the Walkerville Council blow this to pieces.
I knew SOMEBODY would bugger this up, at least...

A-Town
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 422
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2017 10:14 am

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#18 Post by A-Town » Thu Mar 07, 2024 7:52 pm

The SCAP have had a few shockers of late.

SBD
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2723
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
Location: Blakeview

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#19 Post by SBD » Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:49 pm

dsriggs wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 4:51 pm
dsriggs wrote:
Fri Sep 08, 2023 9:22 pm
Great idea, great location right near the edge of the city, nice use of the old hotel.

Watch the Walkerville Council blow this to pieces.
I knew SOMEBODY would bugger this up, at least...
Just about the only thing they did not have an issue with was the overall height/number of levels!

It seems to me that a lot of the concerns could have been addressed by architects and designers having a coffee with the SCAP members/advisors to understand what would be accepted. Are they allowed to regard this meeting as a trial run, address the feedback and resubmit in a few months?

User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2764
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#20 Post by ChillyPhilly » Sun Mar 10, 2024 1:33 am

SBD wrote:
Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:49 pm
dsriggs wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 4:51 pm
dsriggs wrote:
Fri Sep 08, 2023 9:22 pm
Great idea, great location right near the edge of the city, nice use of the old hotel.

Watch the Walkerville Council blow this to pieces.
I knew SOMEBODY would bugger this up, at least...
Just about the only thing they did not have an issue with was the overall height/number of levels!

It seems to me that a lot of the concerns could have been addressed by architects and designers having a coffee with the SCAP members/advisors to understand what would be accepted. Are they allowed to regard this meeting as a trial run, address the feedback and resubmit in a few months?
They could re-apply with a revised design that satisfies what SCAP deemed to not satisfy.
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

WGG
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2019 1:57 pm

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#21 Post by WGG » Tue Mar 12, 2024 7:14 pm

SBD wrote:
Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:49 pm
dsriggs wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 4:51 pm
dsriggs wrote:
Fri Sep 08, 2023 9:22 pm
Great idea, great location right near the edge of the city, nice use of the old hotel.

Watch the Walkerville Council blow this to pieces.
I knew SOMEBODY would bugger this up, at least...
Just about the only thing they did not have an issue with was the overall height/number of levels!

It seems to me that a lot of the concerns could have been addressed by architects and designers having a coffee with the SCAP members/advisors to understand what would be accepted. Are they allowed to regard this meeting as a trial run, address the feedback and resubmit in a few months?
That would most certainly be a conflict of interest, unethical and breach the Accredited Professional code of conduct.

The application has been refused.

There are two pathways to take:
1. Appeal the decision to the Environment, Resources and Development Court.
2. Submit a new application.

With pathway 1, it is quite often that either a 'pending track' or 'conference track' will take place, in which a 'compromise' proposal will be submitted to the SCAP.
These are confidential, and we will not know the outcome until the Court makes consent orders.
If the court sees there is no prospect of resolution, a directions hearing will take place and will follow the 'hearings track'.

User avatar
timtam20292
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1472
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:03 pm

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#22 Post by timtam20292 » Tue Mar 12, 2024 9:17 pm

nimby morons. :roll:

Dvious
Legendary Member!
Posts: 643
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 11:46 pm

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#23 Post by Dvious » Tue Mar 12, 2024 9:51 pm

I actually agree with the refusal. Scale, setbacks and design aesthetic are actually all quite poor. Not all development is good development. Back to the drawing board from me.

User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2764
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#24 Post by ChillyPhilly » Tue Mar 12, 2024 9:53 pm

Dvious wrote:
Tue Mar 12, 2024 9:51 pm
I actually agree with the refusal. Scale, setbacks and design aesthetic are actually all quite poor. Not all development is good development. Back to the drawing board from me.
I am the same. I would be happy if this was 30+ storeys, but the ground level activation and scale was minimal at best.
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2764
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#25 Post by ChillyPhilly » Mon Jun 03, 2024 11:51 pm

Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2576
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#26 Post by Patrick_27 » Wed Jun 05, 2024 12:05 am

Is this meant to be an improvement? The previous submission was FAR superior...

urban
Legendary Member!
Posts: 610
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:59 am
Location: City of Unley

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#27 Post by urban » Wed Jun 05, 2024 9:11 am

The images from the Indaily article are the previous submission.

The new scheme hasn't been released.

abc
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1221
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:35 pm

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#28 Post by abc » Wed Jun 05, 2024 12:38 pm

Patrick_27 wrote:
Wed Jun 05, 2024 12:05 am
Is this meant to be an improvement? The previous submission was FAR superior...
they're photos of the rejected submission champ
tired of low IQ hacks

Nort
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2295
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#29 Post by Nort » Wed Jun 05, 2024 1:33 pm

:lol:

Alyx
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 270
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 9:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

[PRO] Re: Buckingham Arms | 10lvs | $150m

#30 Post by Alyx » Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:34 pm

From $150m for 180 apartments across ten levels to...
The Advertiser wrote:New plans for a 29-townhouse development behind the historic Buckingham Arms Hotel have been lodged in a dramatic downscaling of earlier contentious plans.

Citify has confirmed it submitted revised plans for the 29 three-storey townhouses with Walkerville council in the latest bid to develop the site.

Each would have three bedrooms and two bathrooms, with two internally accessible car parks, with the maximum building height of 10.5m.
Image

Image

Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests