[SWP] Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
HiTouch
Legendary Member!
Posts: 860
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 10:40 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#1141 Post by HiTouch » Mon Nov 25, 2024 10:30 am

I love small start-ups like Sierra Nevada Corporation and British Aerospace

abc
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1335
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:35 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#1142 Post by abc » Mon Nov 25, 2024 11:54 am

Spurdo wrote:
Sun Nov 24, 2024 10:15 pm
abc wrote:
Sun Nov 24, 2024 8:05 pm

quoted for posterity

stick to video games and memes child
Lmao, you’re one to talk about “memes”, nearly all you ever go on about is “muh west bad” and ballwash foreign dictators. Sounds like someone’s been browsing a little too much 4chan.
see my sig
tired of low IQ hacks

mattblack
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1131
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 11:20 am

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#1143 Post by mattblack » Mon Nov 25, 2024 1:01 pm

Moving right along from the personal insults;

Local collaboration to accelerate atomic clock technology

South Australian company QuantX Labs, has partnered with the University of Adelaide to advance cutting-edge quantum technology that will elevate Defence’s navigation and communication capabilities in challenging environments.

The Defence Trailblazer-led research collaboration will focus on developing atomic clock technology to significantly enhance navigation networks and support Defence applications.

The University of Adelaide’s Institute for Photonics and Advanced Sensing (IPAS) chief innovator and lead researcher on the project Professor Andre Luiten said the project builds on four years of collaboration and unites a team of globally leading clock researchers with technical experts at QuantX Labs, a world-leader in high-precision timing and quantum sensor technologies.

“These joint efforts will enable nationally significant research to transition from the laboratory to products that can be utilised by our trusted partners,” Prof Luiten said.

When global satellite navigation networks, like GPS become unavailable, critical infrastructure, such as data centres and defence technology, can be compromised due to their reliance on precise synchronisation across multiple locations.

The development of advanced clocks ensures these systems remain synchronised for extended periods, even when satellite signals are jammed or spoofed – an increasing challenge for Defence in complex modern-day conflicts and degraded environments.

QuantX Labs has developed a suite of quantum clocks for both terrestrial and space applications, including its TEMPO clock, which provides precise navigation on mobile platforms that can be deployed into low and medium earth orbit satellite constellations.

Dr Sebastian Ng, Head of PNT (Positioning, Navigation, and Timing) and the sponsor of this research at QuantX Labs said the project will explore alternate techniques to ensure their TEMPO clock is developed with the best, fit-for-purpose technologies.

“Defence Trailblazer gives us the ability to harness the complementary expertise and talents of our company’s staff and those of the researchers and graduate students at University of Adelaide. Together, we’re ready and able to push the limits of precision timing,” Dr Ng said.

Defence Trailblazer technology development and acceleration general manager Dr Margaret Law said the collaboration represents a pivotal moment in the pursuit of innovative solutions for critical infrastructure resilience.

“By advancing atomic clock technology, we are not only enhancing navigation capabilities but also ensuring that our defence systems remain robust in the face of emerging challenges,” Dr Law said.

https://defencesa.com/news-events-and-m ... echnology/

Spurdo
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 270
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2016 9:20 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#1144 Post by Spurdo » Mon Nov 25, 2024 3:00 pm

abc wrote:
Mon Nov 25, 2024 11:54 am
see my sig
Lmao, the Putin simp is calling ME stupid? That’s rich.

User avatar
SouthAussie94
Legendary Member!
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:03 pm
Location: Southern Suburbs

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#1145 Post by SouthAussie94 » Thu Feb 06, 2025 4:08 pm

The North Terrace dustbowl is becoming a political stain for the Premier

Mike Smithson

It’s rapidly approaching the Premier’s official ‘political basking’ season.

He’s preparing for the public relations power and glory of LIV Golf, AFL Gather Round and various festivals.

“Everywhere-Mali” will be almost everywhere over the next weeks and months, except for one prominent Adelaide landmark.

Peter Malinauskas will continue to bypass a valuable piece of dirt at Lot Fourteen on North Terrace where the old Royal Adelaide Hospital’s East Wing once stood.

Full Article : https://www.indailysa.com.au/news/opini ... he-premier
"All we are is bags of bones pushing against a self imposed tide. Just be content with staying alive"

Views and opinions expressed are my own and don't necessarily reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation

abc
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1335
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:35 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#1146 Post by abc » Thu Feb 06, 2025 4:55 pm

SouthAussie94 wrote:
Thu Feb 06, 2025 4:08 pm
The North Terrace dustbowl is becoming a political stain for the Premier

Mike Smithson

It’s rapidly approaching the Premier’s official ‘political basking’ season.

He’s preparing for the public relations power and glory of LIV Golf, AFL Gather Round and various festivals.

“Everywhere-Mali” will be almost everywhere over the next weeks and months, except for one prominent Adelaide landmark.

Peter Malinauskas will continue to bypass a valuable piece of dirt at Lot Fourteen on North Terrace where the old Royal Adelaide Hospital’s East Wing once stood.

Full Article : https://www.indailysa.com.au/news/opini ... he-premier
they least they can do is plant some lawn there so its not a dustbowl
tired of low IQ hacks

HiTouch
Legendary Member!
Posts: 860
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 10:40 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#1147 Post by HiTouch » Thu Feb 06, 2025 5:02 pm

SouthAussie94 wrote:
Thu Feb 06, 2025 4:08 pm
The North Terrace dustbowl is becoming a political stain for the Premier

Mike Smithson

It’s rapidly approaching the Premier’s official ‘political basking’ season.

He’s preparing for the public relations power and glory of LIV Golf, AFL Gather Round and various festivals.

“Everywhere-Mali” will be almost everywhere over the next weeks and months, except for one prominent Adelaide landmark.

Peter Malinauskas will continue to bypass a valuable piece of dirt at Lot Fourteen on North Terrace where the old Royal Adelaide Hospital’s East Wing once stood.

Full Article : https://www.indailysa.com.au/news/opini ... he-premier
More heat should be on for Peter Malinauskas. This and the Festival Plaza have been negatively impacted the Parklands.

User avatar
Llessur2002
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2163
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
Location: Inner West

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#1148 Post by Llessur2002 » Thu Feb 06, 2025 6:39 pm

Surely at this stage the easiest, cheapest and least controversial route is to turn the land over to the Botanic Garden. I image net approval for this among the voting public would be pretty high.

I can't see funding springing up for the indigenous gallery, nor can I see a contemporary gallery or similar costing any less.

A-Town
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 460
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2017 10:14 am

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#1149 Post by A-Town » Thu Feb 06, 2025 6:48 pm

Llessur2002 wrote:
Thu Feb 06, 2025 6:39 pm
Surely at this stage the easiest, cheapest and least controversial route is to turn the land over to the Botanic Garden. I image net approval for this among the voting public would be pretty high.

I can't see funding springing up for the indigenous gallery, nor can I see a contemporary gallery or similar costing any less.
One of the original proposals was to return the east wing from the old RAH to Botanic Garden.

Populist Pete knows there's no (or very little) votes to be won by constructing a brand new gallery in excess of $600m in the cost of living crisis that continues to drag on.

https://renewalsa.sa.gov.au/news/histor ... s-east-end

User avatar
gnrc_louis
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1015
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2018 2:04 pm
Location: Adelaide

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#1150 Post by gnrc_louis » Thu Feb 06, 2025 6:59 pm

Llessur2002 wrote:
Thu Feb 06, 2025 6:39 pm
Surely at this stage the easiest, cheapest and least controversial route is to turn the land over to the Botanic Garden. I image net approval for this among the voting public would be pretty high.
Honestly, wouldn't be the worst outcome at this point.

abc
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1335
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:35 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#1151 Post by abc » Thu Feb 06, 2025 10:11 pm

A-Town wrote:
Thu Feb 06, 2025 6:48 pm
Llessur2002 wrote:
Thu Feb 06, 2025 6:39 pm
Surely at this stage the easiest, cheapest and least controversial route is to turn the land over to the Botanic Garden. I image net approval for this among the voting public would be pretty high.

I can't see funding springing up for the indigenous gallery, nor can I see a contemporary gallery or similar costing any less.
One of the original proposals was to return the east wing from the old RAH to Botanic Garden.

Populist Pete knows there's no (or very little) votes to be won by constructing a brand new gallery in excess of $600m in the cost of living crisis that continues to drag on.

https://renewalsa.sa.gov.au/news/histor ... s-east-end
one of the original proposals? :roll:

that was literally the original promise the Labor government made when this project was approved
tired of low IQ hacks

VinyTapestry849
Legendary Member!
Posts: 761
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2020 5:03 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#1152 Post by VinyTapestry849 » Fri Feb 07, 2025 12:15 am

$600m? This is never gonna happen lol. It’s a shame it would’ve been good.

Prodical
Legendary Member!
Posts: 691
Joined: Sun May 15, 2016 5:10 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#1153 Post by Prodical » Fri Feb 07, 2025 10:28 am

Returning it to parklands / botanic gardens would be a great outcome.

User avatar
Nathan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3862
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
Location: Bowden
Contact:

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#1154 Post by Nathan » Fri Feb 07, 2025 11:03 am

Returning it to botanic garden or parklands sounds good in theory, but it's only a good idea if it comes with additional funding to maintain it as a quality space (and given its location, it needs to be a high quality space). If the botanic garden is expected to stretch their existing budget to cover the new area, then it will be a negative for the entire garden.

Given the state governments history of investment in the parklands (which is to say, none, and leaving it to the city council to look after it all) — I'm not convinced of that option.

bits
Legendary Member!
Posts: 849
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:24 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#1155 Post by bits » Fri Feb 07, 2025 1:38 pm

You can't compare botanic garden to parkland funding.

Parklands are mostly an Adelaide City council thing. The users are local residents and local businesses.
Playing sport, walking, riding, school use etc.
The parks in suburbs are mostly paid for by local councils also.
The state government already puts more money towards Adelaide council parks than parks in suburbs.

Botanic garden is a state government thing.
The users are from all over.
Its peers are things like the sa museum, the sa library, the sa art gallery, and all the other significant things in the city etc which are funded by the state not the Adelaide City council.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Songsting, SouthAussie94 and 9 guests