COM: Glenelg Tramline Upgrade

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
User avatar
Tom
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 5:43 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1756 Post by Tom » Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:00 am

rubberman wrote:
The rail in 1929 was just the old steam train rail turned around so that the old running surface was on the outside - so if any of it exists still, it could be turn of the 20th century stuff. Wow. I think they got rid of most of that in the seventies - but I could be wrong.
If you look out the window of a tram when stoped you will see that there are still plenty of 1929 dates in rails :) .
Garno!
Image

User avatar
AG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2093
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1757 Post by AG » Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:31 pm

Late Bay trams stop 1km short
December 16, 2007 12:15am
PASSENGERS travelling to Glenelg are being dumped short of their destination as authorities struggle to keep trams running on time.

Rail operator TransAdelaide has admitted it is taking shortcuts and terminating Glenelg-bound services at Brighton Rd as a lack of punctuality continues to plague the tramline, two months after the opening of the $31 million tramline extension to City West.
Commuters are being asked to wait for another tram at Brighton Rd station or walk the remaining kilometre to Moseley Square, where the tram is supposed to terminate.

The unscheduled stop has been blamed on traffic delays in the city and a shortage of trams, which are compounding delays, with trams running up to 10 minutes late.

"If a tram service is running very late, an operational decision is made to terminate Glenelg-bound services at Brighton Road," TransAdelaide general manager Bill Watson said in an emailed statement.

"In all cases another tram is close behind, meaning customers at Moseley Square are not substantially inconvenienced.

"TransAdelaide will also terminate Glenelg-bound services when traffic is so heavy along Jetty Road that it's likely the tram will become substantially delayed in the traffic."

He said TransAdelaide was continuing to monitor patronage since the opening of the City West extension.

Under the present timetable, trams are given on average 38 minutes to travel between City West and Moseley Square.

Glenelg resident Kathryn Davies said that on a number of occasions she had had to alight at Brighton Rd.

She said it was causing confusion for tourists and was a "comedy of errors".

"People should expect to catch a tram to Jetty Rd or Moseley Square," she said. "The trams are never late when they leave from Victoria Square.

"It would appear the timetable doesn't allow enough time for the trams to get through the city. The tram stopping at Brighton Rd does cause confusion for tourists or people who do not regularly use the tram service."

In November, the Rail Tram and Bus Industry Union instructed members to ignore the timetables, saying it was not their responsibility to ensure the timetables and schedules work.

"Your main role is to drive the trams in a safe manner which does not put the safety of passengers, your fellow employees or the public at risk," a union notice posted at the Glengowrie depot said at the time. "If this means the trams cannot run on time then so be it."

At the time, Mr Watson said that automatic signalling, since installed at City West and South Tce, would improve punctuality.

In October, the Sunday Mail revealed that TransAdelaide could not run extra trams because it would create traffic congestion as a result of boom gates along the tramline being constantly raised and lowered.

Union secretary Ashley Waddell said the tram fleet was "stretched".

"The fleet has done a fair bit of work so maintenance has become a priority," he said.

"It (the timetable) is pretty tight between City West and South Tce, and if they start losing time there it compounds throughout the day.

"But I don't think it's causing a great deal of a delay for the passengers because there's a tram not too far behind it – they might have to wait three or four minutes on the platform."

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4581
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1758 Post by AtD » Sun Dec 16, 2007 2:37 pm

Is there any reason the boom gates couldn't be replaced with regular traffic lights (with tram priority), and would this solve the problem of no more trams permitted?

muzzamo
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1029
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 4:44 pm

Re: Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1759 Post by muzzamo » Sun Dec 16, 2007 3:10 pm

I have wondered this myself too.... That way you could pump as many trams down as you liked

User avatar
Will409
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1038
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:12 am
Location: Parafield Gardens

Re: Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1760 Post by Will409 » Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:49 pm

AtD wrote:Is there any reason the boom gates couldn't be replaced with regular traffic lights (with tram priority), and would this solve the problem of no more trams permitted?
You may be able to use that loop hole to get more services run but that does raise another issue, what rollingstock will you use? During peak periods, all 11 flexis are being used. Even if you did get more Flexis, were would you put them because Glengowrie is stuffed to the rafters with trams.
Last edited by Will409 on Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image LINK TO YOUTUBE PROFILE.

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4581
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1761 Post by AtD » Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:57 pm

That still leaves the H's

User avatar
Cruise
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2209
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Bay 115, Football Park

Re: Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1762 Post by Cruise » Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:47 pm

AtD wrote:That still leaves the H's
I didnt think they meet the standards now

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5527
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1763 Post by crawf » Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:41 am

Definitely time to start buying more trams

kymbosa
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 113
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:39 pm

Re: Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1764 Post by kymbosa » Mon Dec 17, 2007 5:23 pm

This practice of stopping trams at brighton road has been going on for years. It has nothing to do with the amount of trams nor, the new section of track, but jetty road. In summer this road becomes a mobile car park. Normally taking 7 to 15minutes to travel in one direction. As a result of this it can cause trams to be late. There is nothing wrong with what they do as most of the time there is a tram running early or on time around 5minutes behind the one that is running late.

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4581
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1765 Post by AtD » Mon Dec 17, 2007 6:02 pm

All the more reason Jetty Rd should be a padestrian mall.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1766 Post by Wayno » Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:23 am

hi all, this is my 1st post. I'm interested in knowing more about the Glenelg Tram line overpass at South Rd. Will it be done? and if so will it be completed in a similar timeframe to the South Rd/ Anzac Hwy underpass? thanks in advance...
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
AG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2093
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1767 Post by AG » Tue Dec 18, 2007 8:36 am

Wayno wrote:hi all, this is my 1st post. I'm interested in knowing more about the Glenelg Tram line overpass at South Rd. Will it be done? and if so will it be completed in a similar timeframe to the South Rd/ Anzac Hwy underpass? thanks in advance...
I imagine the tram overpass could be constructed very quickly compared to the South Road underpass at Anzac Highway. Earthworks required before building the bridge section could be completed without disrupting tram or road traffic, and then the tram line shut down completely for a week or two in order to complete the approaches on each side, followed by the roadway over a single weekend to allow bridge sections to be assembled. This is typically how a lot of the grade separation constructions seem to occur. The Middleborough Road grade separation required building a new cutting for the Belgrave and Lilydale train lines which required both the road and rail line to be shut for an entire month until the road bridge was complete.

These images give a good idea of how a lot of contractors tend to go about grade separation:

http://www.vicsig.net/index.php?page=in ... roject=mrp

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1768 Post by Wayno » Tue Dec 18, 2007 8:44 am

AG wrote:
Wayno wrote:hi all, this is my 1st post. I'm interested in knowing more about the Glenelg Tram line overpass at South Rd. Will it be done? and if so will it be completed in a similar timeframe to the South Rd/ Anzac Hwy underpass? thanks in advance...
I imagine the tram overpass could be constructed very quickly compared to the South Road underpass at Anzac Highway. Earthworks required before building the bridge section could be completed without disrupting tram or road traffic, and then the tram line shut down completely for a week or two in order to complete the approaches on each side, followed by the roadway over a single weekend to allow bridge sections to be assembled. This is typically how a lot of the grade separation constructions seem to occur. The Middleborough Road grade separation required building a new cutting for the Belgrave and Lilydale train lines which required both the road and rail line to be shut for an entire month until the road bridge was complete.

These images give a good idea of how a lot of contractors tend to go about grade separation:

http://www.vicsig.net/index.php?page=in ... roject=mrp
So who owns the Tram Overpass? Is it the Goodwood Council? and has the overpass been approved with a definite timeline for development?
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
AG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2093
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1769 Post by AG » Tue Dec 18, 2007 8:50 am

The Department of Transport Energy and Infrastructure is responsible for the tram overpass. They haven't released a full timeline of construction as far as I know, but they have planned to have it completed towards the end of 2009, around when the nearby underpass at Anzac Highway is expected to be completed.

cruel_world00
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 786
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:54 am

Re: Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1770 Post by cruel_world00 » Thu Dec 20, 2007 4:55 pm

There are many streets that would definitely benefit from having a tram running down them. Could you imagine the increase in retail and "decentness" of Unley Road or even Henley Beach Road if there was the bonus of having a tram down the middle. Sure traffic would be interesting but people seem to cope in Melbourne with sharing the road with trams. Maybe it would go a long way in creating better Adelaide drivers if they had to work with the trams..HA



North Adelaide and Port Adelaide are also obvious locations. Port Adelaide has so much potential that isn't showing just yet. The main street could be so much better. Hopefully all the development down there will cause this place to come alive!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 3 guests