[COM] 374-400 King William Street | 47m | 11lvls | Office
[COM] Re: #U/C: 374-400 King William St | 47m | 11lvls | Office
Wow, that's a great picture, it shows just how close together all three projects are. That section of King William Street will look so different in a year or so when these are all completed!
[COM] Re: #U/C: 374-400 King William St | 47m | 11lvls | Office
This photo by Ben does a pretty good job of showing how dominant it is already.Shuz wrote:I don't think one really realises the dominance this will have.
- Prince George
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 974
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:02 pm
- Location: Melrose Park
[COM] Re: #U/C: 374-400 King William St | 47m | 11lvls | Office
Personally, I'm a little surprised that so many people are so positive about this building and vehemently negative about Spark. Spark may not be a beauty queen, but it has it all over this building in one crucial respect - it wasn't just a straight rectangular extrusion of the plot into the air. People are right to say that this will be "dominating", but I for one am not expecting that in a good way. And don't get me started about the render; that ghostly, invisible, see-through building. It even suggested that there would be no vertical supports visible from the outside - I think we can bust that myth already. Even prior to Lot 8 we had no reason to really expect anything but a massive boxy slab in a place where we might have had a couple of buildings to provide some kind of variety.
I don't mean to come off sounding so cantankerous, but the only way I can explain the difference in the two reactions is that there's a line of thought running "glass on all four walls = good, concrete anywhere = bad". That sounds just plain wrong to me, and I think that these two buildings are the proof.
I don't mean to come off sounding so cantankerous, but the only way I can explain the difference in the two reactions is that there's a line of thought running "glass on all four walls = good, concrete anywhere = bad". That sounds just plain wrong to me, and I think that these two buildings are the proof.
-
- Sen-Rookie-Sational
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 4:05 pm
[COM] Re: #U/C: 374-400 King William St | 47m | 11lvls | Office
my new word for the day cheersPrince George wrote:cantankerous
[COM] Re: #U/C: 374-400 King William St | 47m | 11lvls | Office
By god, well noticed Prince George, there is not a single beam visible in that render, and if this building is characterised by any one thing - it's a shit load of steel beams! That render is downright deception! On the upside, the building covers up the hideous carpark completely, and that is an improvement in my books.Prince George: And don't get me started about the render; that ghostly, invisible, see-through building. It even suggested that there would be no vertical supports visible from the outside
[COM] Re: #U/C: 374-400 King William St | 47m | 11lvls | Office
are we sure the glass won't cover the beams?omada wrote:By god, well noticed Prince George, there is not a single beam visible in that render, and if this building is characterised by any one thing - it's a shit load of steel beams! That render is downright deception! On the upside, the building covers up the hideous carpark completely, and that is an improvement in my books.Prince George: And don't get me started about the render; that ghostly, invisible, see-through building. It even suggested that there would be no vertical supports visible from the outside
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.
-
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:34 pm
[COM] Re: #U/C: 374-400 King William St | 47m | 11lvls | Office
PG your the one who is cantankerous, at least this design is not a photoshop
clone of the City Central building with its pods...
clone of the City Central building with its pods...
- Prince George
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 974
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:02 pm
- Location: Melrose Park
[COM] Re: #U/C: 374-400 King William St | 47m | 11lvls | Office
The glass they show in the render is transparent - you can see the interior lights and even right through the corners. Whether they use that glass leaving us looking at the frame or they switch materials, are we really getting the building in the picture?Wayno wrote:are we sure the glass won't cover the beams?
Erm, wasn't that what I said?ozisnowman wrote:PG your the one who is cantankerous
[COM] Re: #U/C: 374-400 King William St | 47m | 11lvls | Office
couple of pics as I was riding past today
[COM] Re: #U/C: 374-400 King William St | 47m | 11lvls | Office
The steel beams have reached full height! Looking at the indendations for the floorplates in the beams, total floor count now comes at 11, with 5 completed and 2 in progress.
God, wait till the glass goes up on this one.
God, wait till the glass goes up on this one.
[COM] Re: #U/C: 374-400 King William St | 47m | 11lvls | Office
I'm a bit worried to see the glass, because I have a high feeling this development will looking nothing like the render - hope I'm wrong.
[COM] Re: #U/C: 374-400 King William St | 47m | 11lvls | Office
Wow JK, you've got a steady hand while you're riding!
cheers,
Rhino
Rhino
[COM] Re: #U/C: 374-400 King William St | 47m | 11lvls | Office
This is going to be quite the beast once it is complete
South Australia the Festival State
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Will and 1 guest