State Election 2010

Anything goes here.. :) Now with Beer Garden for our smoking patrons.

Who do you intend to vote for at the 2010 election?

Labor
40
45%
Liberal
32
36%
Greens
11
12%
Family First
0
No votes
Democrats
2
2%
Nationals
0
No votes
Independent (Other)
4
4%
 
Total votes: 89

Message
Author
User avatar
AG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2093
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: State Election 2010

#181 Post by AG » Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:13 pm

Anyone remember the Clinton and Lewinsky Scandal? Is it just me or do I see plenty of parallels here?

User avatar
Hoops
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:49 pm

Re: State Election 2010

#182 Post by Hoops » Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:55 pm

I pretty much just laughed all through tonights Sunday Night episode,


The music paired with dodgy "hidden camera" style shots of him *gasp* In an elevator.

The "I think that shes a fantastic mother" THEY HAD SEX ON HIS DESK "A close friend" THEY DID IT IN THE PARK LANDS

was a bit ridiculous. Some of those questions were also very, "Lets get the most out of this $200 00 . 00 " as well

User avatar
AG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2093
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: State Election 2010

#183 Post by AG » Mon Nov 23, 2009 9:03 am

Hoops wrote:I pretty much just laughed all through tonights Sunday Night episode,


The music paired with dodgy "hidden camera" style shots of him *gasp* In an elevator.

The "I think that shes a fantastic mother" THEY HAD SEX ON HIS DESK "A close friend" THEY DID IT IN THE PARK LANDS

was a bit ridiculous. Some of those questions were also very, "Lets get the most out of this $200 00 . 00 " as well
When they're paying that much for an interview, they may as well milk the most out of it to get as many viewers as possible... sounds like the media doing what they do best.

User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 3650
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Glenelg

Re: State Election 2010

#184 Post by SRW » Mon Nov 23, 2009 1:08 pm

AG wrote:Anyone remember the Clinton and Lewinsky Scandal? Is it just me or do I see plenty of parallels here?
I don't see many. This is an entirely media-driven scandal, whereas the Lewinsky incident was an altogether broader political conspiracy. I don't expect the Liberals to run very far with it if indeed they chose to do so. The fact is, Australian politics has not traditionally indulged in this type of thing, most likely because to do so is to open up secrets on both sides of the divide. Moreover, there just isn't very much to say about this in relation to his abilities as Premier.
Keep Adelaide Weird

User avatar
AG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2093
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: State Election 2010

#185 Post by AG » Mon Nov 23, 2009 1:33 pm

SRW wrote:I don't see many. This is an entirely media-driven scandal, whereas the Lewinsky incident was an altogether broader political conspiracy.
There's truth in that. I wonder how much this story will get pushed, or whether it'll just be forgotten almost as quickly as the Foley Depression story.
SRW wrote:I don't expect the Liberals to run very far with it if indeed they chose to do so. The fact is, Australian politics has not traditionally indulged in this type of thing, most likely because to do so is to open up secrets on both sides of the divide. Moreover, there just isn't very much to say about this in relation to his abilities as Premier.
I don't think many doubt his abilities as a premier, but more so his character. Whether the allegations are true or if this is just a media beat up remains to be seen. Considering how good Mike Rann is at dealing with the media, I'd be surprised if this pushes him out of politics completely.

User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 3650
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Glenelg

Re: State Election 2010

#186 Post by SRW » Mon Nov 23, 2009 2:01 pm

AG wrote:Considering how good Mike Rann is at dealing with the media, I'd be surprised...
This is probably the reason the story has been pushed so far. I imagine there are a few bitter 'journos', disgruntled at being stage managed, grinning with schadenfreude right now.
Keep Adelaide Weird

User avatar
Shuz
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2539
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Glandore

Re: State Election 2010

#187 Post by Shuz » Mon Nov 23, 2009 3:07 pm

Attention directed to the Liberals for a moment; just to make a note of, Liberals have been silent throughout this whole thing. No statements, nothing.

On either regard, I'd like to think that they are acting in moral defense to let it fall out on its own terms and simply to distance themselves from an issue which doesn't concern them.

My suspicions are arising if they're in on this - They did say themselves that they would launch a dirty campaign upcoming to the Election.

Note aside, what is the trace of the "undisclosed sum" to which Ms. Chandelier was paid for? Were any "donations" lodged to either New Idea and/or Channel 7 in the last few weeks?

Briggzy_03
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 136
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:34 pm

Re: State Election 2010

#188 Post by Briggzy_03 » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:40 pm

Shuz wrote:My suspicions are arising if they're in on this - They did say themselves that they would launch a dirty campaign upcoming to the Election.

Note aside, what is the trace of the "undisclosed sum" to which Ms. Chandelier was paid for? Were any "donations" lodged to either New Idea and/or Channel 7 in the last few weeks?
You're being sarcastic right Shuz?

After listening to Mike Rann's media conference and watching the dribble that was the interview last night, I don't think the possible sex between the two is the problem, but more so the possibility that Mike has lied to the public. I like Mike, he's fought well for this state, but if it's proven that he has indeed lied, then a lot of people will most probably jump ship.

I hope Redmond and co. don't give much attention to this affair, it's not worth their time. Keep pressing the RAH rebuild and water conservation policies.

Hooligan
Legendary Member!
Posts: 906
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:03 pm

Re: State Election 2010

#189 Post by Hooligan » Mon Nov 23, 2009 5:46 pm

lol, Rann screws some lady of easy virtue and Shuz thinks the liberals are behind it.

Code: Select all

Signature removed 

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5858
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: State Election 2010

#190 Post by Will » Mon Nov 23, 2009 11:34 pm

There is a reason why the premier is called 'media Mike'. His stage handling of the media is impeccable. As such I strongly doubt he would let his guard down to such a degree and participate in such a relationship, let alone have sex in such visible and public places as Parliament House and a golf course. Furthermore as I was watching Sunday Night my gut feeling was that Mrs. Chantelois was lying. The moment when she 'broke down' when discussing the moment when her youngest son found out about the alleged affair seemed fake and as if she was trying to cry. Furthermore a person who is feeling ashamed as Mrs. Chantelois claims to be feeling, subconsciously looks a lot at the floor. If you look at the interview, Mrs Chantelois is pretty much always looking at the journalist. It is known that when people tell a lie, they often look at the eyes of the person they are telling the lie to, so as to gauge whether the person is believing the lie. Not to mention the fact that Mrs Chantelois is a low-income earner, and as such for such a person in her position, the prospect of a 6-figure payment is irresistible. Put yourself in her position. If I was her, if someone was paying me $200 000, I would admit to having sex with Mike Rann.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: State Election 2010

#191 Post by Wayno » Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:24 am

Will wrote: if someone was paying me $200 000, I would admit to having sex with Mike Rann.
aha! so you admit it then! ewwwww...
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

Hooligan
Legendary Member!
Posts: 906
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:03 pm

Re: State Election 2010

#192 Post by Hooligan » Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:44 pm

i would like to extend my lolz to the mod that edited my last post.


Good play good sir.

Code: Select all

Signature removed 

User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 3650
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Glenelg

Re: State Election 2010

#193 Post by SRW » Tue Nov 24, 2009 10:18 pm

Still misses the point.
Keep Adelaide Weird

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4581
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: State Election 2010

#194 Post by AtD » Wed Nov 25, 2009 8:43 am

He was single, she was married. Then she waits five years until just before an election to reveal all for an undisclosed amount on national TV. Looks like a duck, quacks like a duck.

Gutter journalism at its best.

stumpjumper
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1497
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 10:10 pm

Re: State Election 2010

#195 Post by stumpjumper » Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:43 am

I'd be surprised if the government hadn't quietly approached Ms 'Chandelier' and her husband immediately aster the rolled up magazine incident to pay them off. Perhaps they still have time.

The problem is not the adultery, it's the morality. Morals may not count for much any more, but the appearance at least of moral behaviour must mean something in the case of our leading citizen.

Try teaching your kids to behave without risking unnecessary hurt to people if they can point to the Premier and say well, he's doing it.

And what about poor old Monsignor David Cappo, who sits on Rann's cabinet? Where does the Roman Catholic church stand on adultery? The phrase 'thou shalt not commit' comes to mind...

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests