[COM] 152-160 Grote Street | 58m | 19 lvls | Mixed Use

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
Nort
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2296
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm

[COM] Re: PRO: 152-160 Grote Street | 52m | 16Lvls | Mixed Use

#46 Post by Nort » Sat Nov 26, 2011 7:25 pm

rev wrote:The more I look at this, the more I think I've seen this or a very similar design/proposal somewhere before.
Maybe it just reminds me of something else, I dunno.
It's fairly generic really for an apartment building, just looks like a scaled up version of what you would find in Mawson Lakes.

serca
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 335
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 11:46 pm

[COM] Re: PRO: 152-160 Grote Street | 52m | 16Lvls | Mixed Use

#47 Post by serca » Sun Nov 27, 2011 11:59 am

I like it , but i agree has a glammed up Mawson Lakes feel .. A fine line as Mawson lakes is full of monolithic eyesores ... All the new developments in this part of CBD have similar architecture/design facades ?

Troy
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 4:42 pm

[COM] Re: PRO: 152-160 Grote Street | 52m | 16Lvls | Mixed Use

#48 Post by Troy » Mon Nov 28, 2011 5:22 pm

Here are some more images supplied by the Architects, Brown Falconer.
Attachments
Pool View.jpg
Pool View
Pool View.jpg (89.61 KiB) Viewed 4634 times
Apartment Living Space 02.jpg
North Facing Apartment View over City
Apartment Living Space 02.jpg (125.68 KiB) Viewed 4634 times
Apartment Living Space 01.jpg
Typical Apartment Living Space
Apartment Living Space 01.jpg (132.1 KiB) Viewed 4634 times

User avatar
Plasmatron
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 400
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 5:16 pm
Location: St Georges, Adelaide, SA
Contact:

[COM] Re: PRO: 152-160 Grote Street | 52m | 16Lvls | Mixed Use

#49 Post by Plasmatron » Mon Nov 28, 2011 5:34 pm

Some lovely renders there, now they just have to stop teasing us and build it. I guess Adelaide's only going to keep getting bulkier before it gets taller!

Actually, didn't someone used to have that username on this forum? "justbuildit"... damn, think I've been lurking this site for too long. :P

Also, that swimming pool is pretty dang awesome... reminds me of rooftop, "edgeless" pool from that massive building in Singapore. You know the one I'm talking about. Right?
https://www.youtube.com/UltraVibeProductions

User avatar
metro
Legendary Member!
Posts: 970
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:11 pm
Location: Sydney

[COM] Re: PRO: 152-160 Grote Street | 52m | 16Lvls | Mixed Use

#50 Post by metro » Mon Nov 28, 2011 6:13 pm

the bottom 2 images look like they're in the right location.. but that top one.. taller than and east of Westpac House?? or is that for another 200+m skyscraper proposal in the eastern suburbs? shh dont tell the NIMBY's :lol:

looks good, would love to live in the city, would be so convenient. Adelaide needs more buildings like this.

User avatar
jk1237
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 1756
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:22 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: PRO: 152-160 Grote Street | 52m | 16Lvls | Mixed Use

#51 Post by jk1237 » Mon Nov 28, 2011 6:20 pm

serca wrote:I like it , but i agree has a glammed up Mawson Lakes feel .. A fine line as Mawson lakes is full of monolithic eyesores ... All the new developments in this part of CBD have similar architecture/design facades ?
well I find the boring box house suburbs and awful weed gardens with 5 cars parked in them of Ingle Farm, Para Hills, Surrey Downs, Aberfoyle Park, Morphett Vale, etc etc (x another 50 suburbs) monolithic eyesores compared to central Mawson Lakes. The only eyesores in Mawson Lakes are the surrounding mcmansions IMO

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6423
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[COM] Re: PRO: 152-160 Grote Street | 52m | 16Lvls | Mixed Use

#52 Post by rev » Mon Nov 28, 2011 10:23 pm

What a view!
I'd imagine it would surely only get better in time.

Image

grator
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:30 am

[COM] Re: PRO: 152-160 Grote Street | 52m | 16Lvls | Mixed Use

#53 Post by grator » Tue Nov 29, 2011 4:25 pm

good to see development on this side of the city. it looks great

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7574
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: PRO: 152-160 Grote Street | 52m | 16Lvls | Mixed Use

#54 Post by Ben » Tue Nov 29, 2011 4:31 pm

rev wrote:What a view!
I'd imagine it would surely only get better in time.

Image
Lime green flooring??? :toilet:

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6423
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[COM] Re: PRO: 152-160 Grote Street | 52m | 16Lvls | Mixed Use

#55 Post by rev » Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:37 pm

I was too busy looking out that window to notice that

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5864
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: PRO: 152-160 Grote Street | 52m | 16Lvls | Mixed Use

#56 Post by Will » Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:05 pm

This project will come before the ACC DAP this coming Monday.

The ACC is expected to REJECT this proposal, thereby adding another example to the long list of shame. Since being relieved of approving projects over $10 million, the ACC has literally rejected every high-rise proposal sent before it. Even though they do not have the final say, the mere act of rejecting every high-rise proposal sent before it, sends very negative messages to potential investors, not to mention locals.

User avatar
Thanial
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 78
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 3:54 pm
Location: Mitcham

[COM] Re: PRO: 152-160 Grote Street | 52m | 16Lvls | Mixed Use

#57 Post by Thanial » Thu Dec 15, 2011 9:11 pm

three comments in a matter of minutes, must be a record for me :lol:

I don't think the building probably being rejected by council will come as a surprise to anyone, it just makes Adelaide appear further more disappointing to possible investors. :? In fact today I was speaking to an elderly woman who was criticising the council for rejecting 123 Flinders Street, she said that she went into the city recently for the first time in quite a few years and said it looked exactly the same as it did in the 80s :roll: If only all of the members of council had the same mindset as this one elderly lady :D

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5521
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: PRO: 152-160 Grote Street | 52m | 16Lvls | Mixed Use

#58 Post by crawf » Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:24 pm

Will wrote:This project will come before the ACC DAP this coming Monday.

The ACC is expected to REJECT this proposal, thereby adding another example to the long list of shame. Since being relieved of approving projects over $10 million, the ACC has literally rejected every high-rise proposal sent before it. Even though they do not have the final say, the mere act of rejecting every high-rise proposal sent before it, sends very negative messages to potential investors, not to mention locals.
Oh what's there reason this time?

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3783
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

[COM] Re: PRO: 152-160 Grote Street | 52m | 16Lvls | Mixed Use

#59 Post by Waewick » Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:31 pm

I think it will be rejected because the council can't paint stupid little coloured dots or put painted cars in front of it,thus showing the world how progressive they are!
Last edited by Waewick on Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5864
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: PRO: 152-160 Grote Street | 52m | 16Lvls | Mixed Use

#60 Post by Will » Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:32 pm

crawf wrote:
Will wrote:This project will come before the ACC DAP this coming Monday.

The ACC is expected to REJECT this proposal, thereby adding another example to the long list of shame. Since being relieved of approving projects over $10 million, the ACC has literally rejected every high-rise proposal sent before it. Even though they do not have the final say, the mere act of rejecting every high-rise proposal sent before it, sends very negative messages to potential investors, not to mention locals.
Oh what's there reason this time?
It's too tall and bulky.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Baidu [Spider], Will and 5 guests