Sensational-Adelaide.com

monotonehell wrote: As per the instructions at the top of every development forum:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1881

Code: Select all

Abbreviations for Project Status
Note that these can be selected from the "Topic Prefix" menu when creating the thread.

VIS: VISion (not yet submitted to authority)
PRO: PROposed (submitted to authority, awaiting approval)
|
APP: APProved by authority
DEF: DEFerred by authority
REJ: REJected by authority
|
ONH: ON Hold
|
SWP: Site Works in Progress
- foundation work commenced; including the excavation of forms for foundations
- Note any site preparation, demolition of existing structures, clearing / leveling soil, ribbon cutting or sod turning ceremonies do not count as starting of site works in progress
|
U/R: Under Renovation
- where not a new build, old structure is undergoing external renovation
U/C: Under Construction
- actual building progress is being made
|
COM: COMpleted
- Tennant ready

Due to so many "ground breaking" ceremonies being little more than gold shovels tooling around in a pile of dirt; when they do the piling, stick in some rebar and pour the foundations we consider U/C.

Did someone jump the gun in the other thread?

I've read that navigation thread and double-consulted it before making that post. SWP means foundation works have commenced, but isn't piling a part of foundation works? That's where the confusion lies.

Unless piling counts as construction because the piles will stay there for the life of the building. I'm fine with that, as most buildings that get to that stage are built, I just find it a bit ambiguous.

slenderman wrote:

monotonehell wrote: As per the instructions at the top of every development forum:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1881

Code: Select all

Abbreviations for Project Status
Note that these can be selected from the "Topic Prefix" menu when creating the thread.

VIS: VISion (not yet submitted to authority)
PRO: PROposed (submitted to authority, awaiting approval)
|
APP: APProved by authority
DEF: DEFerred by authority
REJ: REJected by authority
|
ONH: ON Hold
|
SWP: Site Works in Progress
- foundation work commenced; including the excavation of forms for foundations
- Note any site preparation, demolition of existing structures, clearing / leveling soil, ribbon cutting or sod turning ceremonies do not count as starting of site works in progress
|
U/R: Under Renovation
- where not a new build, old structure is undergoing external renovation
U/C: Under Construction
- actual building progress is being made
|
COM: COMpleted
- Tennant ready

Due to so many "ground breaking" ceremonies being little more than gold shovels tooling around in a pile of dirt; when they do the piling, stick in some rebar and pour the foundations we consider U/C.

Did someone jump the gun in the other thread?

I've read that navigation thread and double-consulted it before making that post. SWP means foundation works have commenced, but isn't piling a part of foundation works? That's where the confusion lies.

Unless piling counts as construction because the piles will stay there for the life of the building. I'm fine with that, as most buildings that get to that stage are built, I just find it a bit ambiguous.

I'd say piling counts as construction. Basically anything beyond excavation.

monotonehell wrote:

slenderman wrote:

monotonehell wrote: As per the instructions at the top of every development forum:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1881

Code: Select all

Abbreviations for Project Status
Note that these can be selected from the "Topic Prefix" menu when creating the thread.

VIS: VISion (not yet submitted to authority)
PRO: PROposed (submitted to authority, awaiting approval)
|
APP: APProved by authority
DEF: DEFerred by authority
REJ: REJected by authority
|
ONH: ON Hold
|
SWP: Site Works in Progress
- foundation work commenced; including the excavation of forms for foundations
- Note any site preparation, demolition of existing structures, clearing / leveling soil, ribbon cutting or sod turning ceremonies do not count as starting of site works in progress
|
U/R: Under Renovation
- where not a new build, old structure is undergoing external renovation
U/C: Under Construction
- actual building progress is being made
|
COM: COMpleted
- Tennant ready

Due to so many "ground breaking" ceremonies being little more than gold shovels tooling around in a pile of dirt; when they do the piling, stick in some rebar and pour the foundations we consider U/C.

Did someone jump the gun in the other thread?

I've read that navigation thread and double-consulted it before making that post. SWP means foundation works have commenced, but isn't piling a part of foundation works? That's where the confusion lies.

Unless piling counts as construction because the piles will stay there for the life of the building. I'm fine with that, as most buildings that get to that stage are built, I just find it a bit ambiguous.

I'd say piling counts as construction. Basically anything beyond excavation.

I agree.

Another category to consider is for when demolition has taken place and the site is cleared and fenced off.
This will be AGSC - Awaiting Golden Shovel Ceremony.

Sent from my GT-S7275T using Tapatalk

Crane base installed and almost ready for ground floor pour.

Crane up today.

Work on the lift/service core is now progressing .Picture 8/6/17

Up to Level 3 already.

There was a mobile crane in operation on site this morning. The permanent crane was hovering overhead couldn't get at something?

The mobile crane Monotonehell mentioned above, was lifting in some precast wall panels. Synagogue place was very congested. Note the Y shaped column holding up the building at the south west corner.

EBG wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 10, 2017 11:29 pm

The mobile crane Monotonehell mentioned above, was lifting in some precast wall panels. Synagogue place was very congested. Note the Y shaped column holding up the building at the south west corner.

Fancy Burger's already struggling shopfront is going be taking a beating from these works, here's hoping they can stick it out until this building goes up and is occupied.

On another point, does anyone know why these buildings aren't being painted and are just going to be raw concrete? Simply painting the building can give it a lot more appeal...

Why is painting preferable to raw concrete? Raw, there’s texture and patina, and painting just removes that for solid colour which doesn’t hold up over time. My heart always sinks a little when I see someone painting concrete.

EBG wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 10, 2017 11:29 pm

The mobile crane Monotonehell mentioned above, was lifting in some precast wall panels. Synagogue place was very congested. Note the Y shaped column holding up the building at the south west corner.

Will be interesting to see how they engineer the extension of Tavistock Lane through to Synagogue Place

Nathan wrote: ↑

Fri Aug 11, 2017 8:10 am

Why is painting preferable to raw concrete? Raw, there’s texture and patina, and painting just removes that for solid colour which doesn’t hold up over time. My heart always sinks a little when I see someone painting concrete.

Same. I always think to the future when the paint is faded and wearing. Are they intending to repaint all these buildings every few years?

I wouldn't mind the raw concrete had the design been a little more interesting. It already looks dated by 40 years, based off of the render. I hope I'm wrong.