Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
-
ralmin
- Gold-Member ;)
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 7:38 pm
#31
Post
by ralmin » Fri Dec 30, 2022 8:18 pm
-
SRW
- Donating Member

- Posts: 3720
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
- Location: Glenelg
#32
Post
by SRW » Fri Dec 30, 2022 10:44 pm
I didn't realise they were looking at Morphett Road in conjunction with the project for Marion and Cross roads. Great news, although funding seemingly not yet committed.
https://dit.sa.gov.au/infrastructure/ma ... s/morphett
Keep Adelaide Weird
-
TrebleSketch
- Sen-Rookie-Sational
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2018 11:54 pm
#33
Post
by TrebleSketch » Sat Jan 07, 2023 6:25 pm
Looking at where they are investigating... Does this mean it will be a road over rail project?
What are the likelihoods of each of the 4 scenarios? While I think rail over road makes sense, maintaining the depo connection would be tricky and I wonder if they can bundle this project with depo expansion too?
-
[Shuz]
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3386
- Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm
#34
Post
by [Shuz] » Sat Jan 07, 2023 8:13 pm
Morphett Road is going to be rail over road. As will Marion and Cross Roads. A new depot will be built in Hindmarsh.
More will be formally announced shortly.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
-
MT269
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2022 1:14 pm
#35
Post
by MT269 » Sat Jan 07, 2023 10:48 pm
What about Brighton Rd? Are there any blueprints/plans for grade separation there?
I was wondering if it would be more practical to excavate land for a below ground corridor, which will complete separate it from the current road and rail network. Rivers/waterways could be an issue.
-
ChillyPhilly
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2877
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: Kaurna Land.
-
Contact:
#36
Post
by ChillyPhilly » Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:15 am
MT269 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 10:48 pm
What about Brighton Rd? Are there any blueprints/plans for grade separation there?
I was wondering if it would be more practical to excavate land for a below ground corridor, which will complete separate it from the current road and rail network. Rivers/waterways could be an issue.
Brighton Road really needs to be rail over road - it was too predictable that Wingard's incompetence saw the project canned.
Edit: I was obviously raging about heavy rail, not light rail

Last edited by
ChillyPhilly on Sun Jan 08, 2023 9:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Our state, our city, our future.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
-
Norman
- Donating Member

- Posts: 6523
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm
#37
Post
by Norman » Sun Jan 08, 2023 9:30 pm
MT269 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 10:48 pm
What about Brighton Rd? Are there any blueprints/plans for grade separation there?
Are you talking about the train or the tram?
-
MT269
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2022 1:14 pm
#38
Post
by MT269 » Sun Jan 15, 2023 11:56 am
Tram
-
cocoiadrop
- Gold-Member ;)
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2022 6:23 pm
- Location: Inner South
#39
Post
by cocoiadrop » Sun Jan 15, 2023 12:39 pm
Considering Brighton Rd for the tram isn't a level crossing rather just where the tram joins traffic, I don't see why it needs anything done. How would you even grade separate it without destroying Jetty Rd?
-
ralmin
- Gold-Member ;)
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 7:38 pm
#40
Post
by ralmin » Mon Jan 16, 2023 8:30 am
If money was no object, I’d tunnel under Brighton and Jetty Rd to an underground terminus at Moseley Square.
More realistically, if the level crossing had to be eliminated, I think they would cut short the line to terminate at Brighton Rd.
-
SRW
- Donating Member

- Posts: 3720
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
- Location: Glenelg
#41
Post
by SRW » Mon Jan 16, 2023 8:45 am
I actually think the tram is essential to traffic calming on Jetty Road. It's a benefit not a detriment that it runs at grade.
Keep Adelaide Weird
-
A-Town
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2017 10:14 am
#42
Post
by A-Town » Mon Jan 16, 2023 10:46 am
SRW wrote: ↑Mon Jan 16, 2023 8:45 am
I actually think the tram is essential to traffic calming on Jetty Road. It's a benefit not a detriment that it runs at grade.
Yes, agreed. I also think they need to reconsider the amount of on-street car parking on Jetty Rd, especially on the western end past Gordan and Partridge Streets. The street would undoubtedly benefit from widened sections for pedestrians, especially during the summer months.
-
Nathan
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3862
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
- Location: Bowden
-
Contact:
#43
Post
by Nathan » Mon Jan 16, 2023 11:44 am
A-Town wrote: ↑Mon Jan 16, 2023 10:46 am
SRW wrote: ↑Mon Jan 16, 2023 8:45 am
I actually think the tram is essential to traffic calming on Jetty Road. It's a benefit not a detriment that it runs at grade.
Yes, agreed. I also think they need to reconsider the amount of on-street car parking on Jetty Rd, especially on the western end past Gordan and Partridge Streets. The street would undoubtedly benefit from widened sections for pedestrians, especially during the summer months.
They tried proposing a slight reduction in street parking, so that they could increase the width and amenity of the footpaths, but traders chucked a fit.
-
SRW
- Donating Member

- Posts: 3720
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
- Location: Glenelg
#44
Post
by SRW » Mon Jan 16, 2023 1:56 pm
A-Town wrote: ↑Mon Jan 16, 2023 10:46 am
SRW wrote: ↑Mon Jan 16, 2023 8:45 am
I actually think the tram is essential to traffic calming on Jetty Road. It's a benefit not a detriment that it runs at grade.
Yes, agreed. I also think they need to reconsider the amount of on-street car parking on Jetty Rd, especially on the western end past Gordan and Partridge Streets. The street would undoubtedly benefit from widened sections for pedestrians, especially during the summer months.
Without continuing off-topic much further, I would argue the highest priority should be re-engineering the Moseley Street intersection for pedestrians. It's so dangerous for people and cars alike, and calming this intersection is unlikely to cause local traders to hyperventiliate.
Keep Adelaide Weird
-
neoballmon
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 522
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:54 am
- Location: Morphett Vale
#45
Post
by neoballmon » Mon Jan 16, 2023 9:36 pm
While the corner shops are demolished, they should have taken the opportunity to build a pedestrian underpass from the square under Colley surfacing on Jetty Road.
Sent from my SM-G996B using Tapatalk
Looking forward to a free-flowing Adelaide!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 10 guests