Sensational-Adelaide.com

abc wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 22, 2023 12:03 pm

Goodsy wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 22, 2023 6:50 am

abc wrote: ↑

Fri Apr 21, 2023 9:49 pm

since when? did our premier pull a Melton trick to make Adelaide look like its growing?

When the boundaries were established as a part of the Planning, Development and Infrastructure Act 2016.



For the record, I still think it's weird they're trying so hard to push Adelaide to the south east and over the hills instead of to the north.

what a joke, no way Mt Barker is part of the Adelaide metro area. Its creative accounting to include it in the population stats. Same trick Dan Andrews pulled with Melton this week to cover up the fact people are leaving Melbourne due to his polcies.

Mount Barker has closed a lot of its industrial base in preference for suburban retail outlets. It likes to claim it's a regional city, but does very little to prove it's not just part of the outer suburbs.

abc wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 22, 2023 12:03 pm

Goodsy wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 22, 2023 6:50 am

abc wrote: ↑

Fri Apr 21, 2023 9:49 pm

since when? did our premier pull a Melton trick to make Adelaide look like its growing?

When the boundaries were established as a part of the Planning, Development and Infrastructure Act 2016.

For the record, I still think it's weird they're trying so hard to push Adelaide to the south east and over the hills instead of to the north.

what a joke, no way Mt Barker is part of the Adelaide metro area. Its creative accounting to include it in the population stats. Same trick Dan Andrews pulled with Melton this week to cover up the fact people are leaving Melbourne due to his polcies.

What's Dan Andrews got to do with anything in this state? People are commuting from Mount Barker to the city for work everyday..

For the record, Melton is 20kms closer to the Melbourne CBD than the Melbourne suburb of Pakenham...

Goodsy wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 22, 2023 4:54 pm

abc wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 22, 2023 12:03 pm

Goodsy wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 22, 2023 6:50 am

When the boundaries were established as a part of the Planning, Development and Infrastructure Act 2016.

For the record, I still think it's weird they're trying so hard to push Adelaide to the south east and over the hills instead of to the north.

what a joke, no way Mt Barker is part of the Adelaide metro area. Its creative accounting to include it in the population stats. Same trick Dan Andrews pulled with Melton this week to cover up the fact people are leaving Melbourne due to his polcies.

What's Dan Andrews got to do with anything in this state? People are commuting from Mount Barker to the city for work everyday..

For the record, Melton is 20kms closer to the Melbourne CBD than the Melbourne suburb of Pakenham...

it also has a lot of nothing in between Melbourne metro area and its boundaries

same with Mt Barker and Adelaide

distance to CBD is irrelevant... you could argue the middle of Port Phillip Bay is part of the Melbourne metro area based on that ludicrous logic

abc wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 22, 2023 5:29 pm

Goodsy wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 22, 2023 4:54 pm

abc wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 22, 2023 12:03 pm

what a joke, no way Mt Barker is part of the Adelaide metro area. Its creative accounting to include it in the population stats. Same trick Dan Andrews pulled with Melton this week to cover up the fact people are leaving Melbourne due to his polcies.

What's Dan Andrews got to do with anything in this state? People are commuting from Mount Barker to the city for work everyday..

For the record, Melton is 20kms closer to the Melbourne CBD than the Melbourne suburb of Pakenham...

it also has a lot of nothing in between Melbourne metro area and its boundaries

same with Mt Barker and Adelaide

distance to CBD is irrelevant... you could argue the middle of Port Phillip Bay is part of the Melbourne metro area based on that ludicrous logic

Lol.. what about Sunbury, gonna blame Dan for incorporating it into Melbourne as well?

Its called Greater Adelaide or the Greater Adelaide Metropolitan region.
There is continuous population between Adelaide and Mount Barker. There's another significant urbanised area, Stirling/Aldgate/Crafers/Bridgewater in between as well.

Wouldn't be surprised if a housing development popped up between Beerenberg Farm and Hahndorf Farm Barn bordered by the freeway and Mount Barker Road.

rev wrote: ↑

Sun Apr 23, 2023 6:19 pm

Its called Greater Adelaide or the Greater Adelaide Metropolitan region.
There is continuous population between Adelaide and Mount Barker. There's another significant urbanised area, Stirling/Aldgate/Crafers/Bridgewater in between as well.

Wouldn't be surprised if a housing development popped up between Beerenberg Farm and Hahndorf Farm Barn bordered by the freeway and Mount Barker Road.

there just isn't

there's literally farms in between...you're even saying it yourself and counting farms as urban sprawl

GCCSAs from the ABS aren't based upon continually built urban areas. The definition is here: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/stand ... ical-areas

The CommSec State of the States has been released for March '23 quarter. S.A has moved up to equal second with Queensland.

S.A is still ranked first for construction work done.

You can download the PDF from this link to see it in more detail.....

https://www.commbank.com.au/articles/ne ... mencements.

Jaymz wrote: ↑

Thu May 04, 2023 1:25 pm

The CommSec State of the States has been released for March '23 quarter. S.A has moved up to equal second with Queensland.

S.A is still ranked first for construction work done.

You can download the PDF from this link to see it in more detail.....

https://www.commbank.com.au/articles/ne ... mencements.

this seems like a misleading statement

abc wrote: ↑

Sat May 06, 2023 1:27 pm

Jaymz wrote: ↑

Thu May 04, 2023 1:25 pm

The CommSec State of the States has been released for March '23 quarter. S.A has moved up to equal second with Queensland.

S.A is still ranked first for construction work done.

You can download the PDF from this link to see it in more detail.....

https://www.commbank.com.au/articles/ne ... mencements.

this seems like a misleading statement

How so?

Jaymz wrote: ↑

Sat May 06, 2023 3:16 pm

abc wrote: ↑

Sat May 06, 2023 1:27 pm

Jaymz wrote: ↑

Thu May 04, 2023 1:25 pm

The CommSec State of the States has been released for March '23 quarter. S.A has moved up to equal second with Queensland.

S.A is still ranked first for construction work done.

You can download the PDF from this link to see it in more detail.....

https://www.commbank.com.au/articles/ne ... mencements.

this seems like a misleading statement

How so?

I doubt that's an absolute figure
must be per capita per percentage or something

abc wrote: ↑

Sat May 06, 2023 3:34 pm

Jaymz wrote: ↑

Sat May 06, 2023 3:16 pm

abc wrote: ↑

Sat May 06, 2023 1:27 pm

this seems like a misleading statement

How so?

I doubt that's an absolute figure
must be per capita per percentage or something

Once again, and I repeat myself for the tenth time if you go back through the thread.... these figures are based on the current figures against the decade average. If you need me to explain what the term "average" means then please say so. But i'm guessing you won't need to if you completed at least year 8 of high school.

Jaymz wrote: ↑

Sat May 06, 2023 4:59 pm

abc wrote: ↑

Sat May 06, 2023 3:34 pm

Jaymz wrote: ↑

Sat May 06, 2023 3:16 pm

How so?

I doubt that's an absolute figure
must be per capita per percentage or something

Once again, and I repeat myself for the tenth time if you go back through the thread.... these figures are based on the current figures against the decade average. If you need me to explain what the term "average" means then please say so. But i'm guessing you won't need to if you completed at least year 8 of high school.

so its comparing SA with SA a decade ago
big deal

abc wrote: ↑

Sat May 06, 2023 6:59 pm

Jaymz wrote: ↑

Sat May 06, 2023 4:59 pm

abc wrote: ↑

Sat May 06, 2023 3:34 pm

I doubt that's an absolute figure
must be per capita per percentage or something

Once again, and I repeat myself for the tenth time if you go back through the thread.... these figures are based on the current figures against the decade average. If you need me to explain what the term "average" means then please say so. But i'm guessing you won't need to if you completed at least year 8 of high school.

so its comparing SA with SA a decade ago
big deal

1+1+1 divided by 3 = 1

abc wrote: ↑

Sat May 06, 2023 6:59 pm

Jaymz wrote: ↑

Sat May 06, 2023 4:59 pm

abc wrote: ↑

Sat May 06, 2023 3:34 pm

I doubt that's an absolute figure
must be per capita per percentage or something

Once again, and I repeat myself for the tenth time if you go back through the thread.... these figures are based on the current figures against the decade average. If you need me to explain what the term "average" means then please say so. But i'm guessing you won't need to if you completed at least year 8 of high school.

so its comparing SA with SA a decade ago
big deal

It's is a big deal.
It's a metric on economic performance.
It shows that Adelaide is growing, regardless of how slowly, not stagnating or declining.

What do you think the current data should be compared to, if not past data for Adelaide? Do you think they're going to compare a data set for Adelaide against another city, to determine growth for Adelaide?