Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
-
Llessur2002
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
- Location: Inner West
#346
Post
by Llessur2002 » Thu Aug 18, 2022 11:34 am
Pistol wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 9:31 am
This has also been identified as the home of the Adelaide Museum of South Australia’s History
According to InDaily it's one of two options:
Mackie told InDaily in April that the History Trust was considering moving into the the Freemasons Hall as one two potential new homes.
https://indaily.com.au/news/local/2022/ ... m-concept/
The existing Masonic and James Stuart exhibitions are actually worth a quick look if you're passing. I had a meeting in the building a while back and got sidetracked on my way out - I found the Stuart stuff quite interesting in particular but I've always had a passing interest in the colonial exploration of Australia (devastating impact to existing communities acknowledged).
-
VinyTapestry849
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2020 5:03 pm
#347
Post
by VinyTapestry849 » Thu Aug 18, 2022 11:57 am
I think I've heard a rumour Crown Resorts might be looking into 207 Pultney street since JWDT still looking for a hotel tenant to finalize with, although there are many contenders with these towers.
These two developments are so exciting, bring it on!!
-
gnrc_louis
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 968
- Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2018 2:04 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#348
Post
by gnrc_louis » Thu Aug 18, 2022 12:34 pm
VinyTapestry849 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 11:57 am
I think I've heard a rumour Crown Resorts might be looking into 207 Pultney street since JWDT still looking for a hotel tenant to finalize with, although there are many contenders with these towers.
These two developments are so exciting, bring it on!!
Crown resorts? I guess that’s good news for the casino then
-
[Shuz]
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm
#349
Post
by [Shuz] » Thu Aug 18, 2022 1:06 pm
Shouldn't it be PRO: now rather than VIS:
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
-
CharlSx
- Sen-Rookie-Sational
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 2:05 pm
#350
Post
by CharlSx » Thu Aug 18, 2022 1:24 pm
[Shuz] wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 1:06 pm
Shouldn't it be PRO: now rather than VIS:
No
-
HiTouch
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 10:40 pm
#351
Post
by HiTouch » Thu Aug 18, 2022 2:08 pm
[Shuz] wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 1:06 pm
Shouldn't it be PRO: now rather than VIS:
No?
There's no official proposal yet...
-
Nathan
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3816
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
- Location: Bowden
-
Contact:
#352
Post
by Nathan » Thu Aug 18, 2022 2:21 pm
I wish the taper was a bit more pronounced, so the building had a bit more of an obviously unique silhouette. As it is, it's barely perceptible in that perspective render.
-
SRW
- Donating Member
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
- Location: Glenelg
#353
Post
by SRW » Thu Aug 18, 2022 2:39 pm
Nathan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 2:21 pm
I wish the taper was a bit more pronounced, so the building had a bit more of an obviously unique silhouette. As it is, it's barely perceptible in that perspective render.
Or, y'know, anything other than an upright box for a change. Curves, tiers, or anything to offer relief/interest in the increasing monotony of the skyscape.
I welcome the development, of course. Just aspiring for more.
Keep Adelaide Weird
-
Mpol02
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 539
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:06 am
#354
Post
by Mpol02 » Fri Aug 19, 2022 2:35 am
I’m shook and ready. Are their taking their time prepping the proposal to ensure they get approval?
-
Algernon
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 9:46 pm
- Location: Moravia
#355
Post
by Algernon » Fri Aug 19, 2022 6:51 am
Mpol02 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 19, 2022 2:35 am
I’m shook and ready. Are their taking their time prepping the proposal to ensure they get approval?
No. We just heard about it earlier than usual.
-
[Shuz]
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm
#356
Post
by [Shuz] » Fri Aug 19, 2022 4:56 pm
Be interesting to see if SA1 / Dominator opts for a height increase to claim the mantle of tallest tower over this one.
Theoretically it is possible. If 187m is permissible at this location, given its close proximity to the flight path, and that's assuming that's at the CASA maximum allowable height limit - SA1 could easily go well above 200, even 220m I would think.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
-
Algernon
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 9:46 pm
- Location: Moravia
#357
Post
by Algernon » Fri Aug 19, 2022 5:18 pm
The 187m height doesn't reference RLs or AHD and really, could be anything. I'm not even sure there has been a height increase yet.
-
arki
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 2:35 am
#358
Post
by arki » Sat Aug 20, 2022 7:18 pm
Algernon wrote: ↑Fri Aug 19, 2022 5:18 pm
The 187m height doesn't reference RLs or AHD and really, could be anything. I'm not even sure there has been a height increase yet.
The renders have changed to reflect the increased height, compare the last one posted to the original.
-
VinyTapestry849
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2020 5:03 pm
#359
Post
by VinyTapestry849 » Sat Aug 20, 2022 7:53 pm
arki wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 7:18 pm
Algernon wrote: ↑Fri Aug 19, 2022 5:18 pm
The 187m height doesn't reference RLs or AHD and really, could be anything. I'm not even sure there has been a height increase yet.
The renders have changed to reflect the increased height, compare the last one posted to the original.
You've seen renders, what?!?
-
rev
- SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
- Posts: 6380
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm
#360
Post
by rev » Sun Aug 21, 2022 12:17 pm
VinyTapestry849 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 7:53 pm
arki wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 7:18 pm
Algernon wrote: ↑Fri Aug 19, 2022 5:18 pm
The 187m height doesn't reference RLs or AHD and really, could be anything. I'm not even sure there has been a height increase yet.
The renders have changed to reflect the increased height, compare the last one posted to the original.
You've seen renders, what?!?
Check the previous page.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Nathan and 5 guests