Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
-
ChillyPhilly
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: Kaurna Land.
-
Contact:
#511
Post
by ChillyPhilly » Tue Jul 04, 2023 1:02 pm
ml69 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2023 12:30 am
If there is ever going to be an underground train station in the Victoria Square precinct, it’ll be located directly under Victoria Square. Why? Because they can then dig a cut and cover hole for the station and platforms, rather than creating a bored tunnel station which are horrendously expensive to build. Cost difference? Hundreds of millions for the station itself.
Spotto wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2023 12:16 am
ChillyPhilly wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2023 12:02 pm
Vasco wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2023 10:31 pm
If I’m not mistaken, I believe there will be one as developer wants the supermarket there however another party / stakeholder wants it on ground level, still TBC.
A basement would be a good provision for a future underground railway station passage or even platform.
Any underground rail link would need to be dug deeper than basement-level. The City Loop runs almost exclusively beneath streets and even those stations get decently deep.
Certainly it would be deeper than basement level, but a basement for the Central Market area could at least give a bit of provision to a future pedestrian entrance to the station.
I agree it would mainly be located beneath Victoria Square for cut-and-cover purposes, but the rail tunnel would need to be bored anyway. So perhaps the station can be a bit of extra excavation.
Either way, platforms should be 300m long to increase the catchment area.
Our state, our city, our future.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
-
timtam20292
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1457
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:03 pm
#512
Post
by timtam20292 » Mon Jul 10, 2023 6:45 pm
Nearly there! Grote Street frontage still standing for now.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Ursus Maritimus
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2022 4:54 pm
#513
Post
by Ursus Maritimus » Mon Jul 10, 2023 9:40 pm
Every morning and evening, when I pass the site on the bus, I wonder whether the Grote Street frontage will still be there. It is. I'm looking forward to the uninterrupted view all the way between Grote Street and Gouger Street. Once the development goes up, that view will never again be seen in our lifetime.
-
AndyWelsh
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 785
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2017 11:44 pm
#514
Post
by AndyWelsh » Thu Jul 13, 2023 10:19 pm
Thought this was interesting:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Jaymz
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 5:12 pm
#515
Post
by Jaymz » Fri Jul 14, 2023 2:09 pm
From today. Certainly opens up a new perspective of the CBD proper....
-
Attachments
-
-
Ursus Maritimus
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2022 4:54 pm
#516
Post
by Ursus Maritimus » Fri Jul 14, 2023 4:44 pm
On the Grote Street side today:
Will the new development cover up the north side of the Sir Samuel Way Building as mentioned above?
-
rev
- SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
- Posts: 6380
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm
#517
Post
by rev » Fri Jul 14, 2023 6:20 pm
Ursus Maritimus wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 4:44 pm
On the Grote Street side today:
Screenshot_20230714-164148_Video Player.jpg
Will the new development cover up the north side of the Sir Samuel Way Building as mentioned above?
The below render, from 2019 which I don't think much has changed except was it the height of the main tower?
Clearly shows the building is not covered up.
What they're probably sooking about is that when viewed from Victoria Square, behind it will be this development.
-
SRW
- Donating Member
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
- Location: Glenelg
#518
Post
by SRW » Fri Jul 14, 2023 6:32 pm
Ursus Maritimus wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 4:44 pm
Will the new development cover up the north side of the Sir Samuel Way Building as mentioned above?
No, this development did not include the link to Victoria Square. That is to be addressed with council in future. I don't know what that post above is talking about. This development is actually creating a new laneway between Grote/Gouger revealing the west side of Sir Samuel Way.
Keep Adelaide Weird
-
VinyTapestry849
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2020 5:03 pm
#519
Post
by VinyTapestry849 » Fri Jul 14, 2023 8:36 pm
rev wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 6:20 pm
Ursus Maritimus wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 4:44 pm
On the Grote Street side today:
Screenshot_20230714-164148_Video Player.jpg
Will the new development cover up the north side of the Sir Samuel Way Building as mentioned above?
The below render, from 2019 which I don't think much has changed except was it the height of the main tower?
Clearly shows the building is not covered up.
What they're probably sooking about is that when viewed from Victoria Square, behind it will be this development.
Compared with the original proposed height, did they increase the height or decrease it?
-
WGG
- Sen-Rookie-Sational
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2019 1:57 pm
#520
Post
by WGG » Fri Jul 14, 2023 8:47 pm
From the approved plans that were public as part of the original consent, the built form is completely separated from the western elevation of the Sir Samuel Way building.
There is a pedestrian link ("laneway") that provides connection between Gouger and Grote Streets along the western edge of the SSW building and the Hilton.
There are many retail tenancies which haave their primary access from this laneway.
On level 2, the car park is cantilevered over this laneway. The car park is set back from SSW and Hilton.
"Victoria Square Link" is not documented as part of the original application.
The supermarket appears on Level 1 of the original application.
Cheers
-
Ursus Maritimus
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2022 4:54 pm
#522
Post
by Ursus Maritimus » Mon Jul 17, 2023 8:27 pm
I just measured it on Google Earth - this is a massive site (by Adelaide standards) The building under demolition measured about 64 metres by 129 metres. That's about 8,256 square metres or 2 acres.
-
SRW
- Donating Member
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
- Location: Glenelg
#523
Post
by SRW » Mon Jul 17, 2023 10:54 pm
Yes, it's massive. Easily the biggest commercial build since the Myer Centre.
Keep Adelaide Weird
-
Ursus Maritimus
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2022 4:54 pm
#525
Post
by Ursus Maritimus » Tue Jul 18, 2023 4:22 pm
prometheus2704 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2023 10:38 am
Does it beat the former Southern Cross Arcade site?
60 King William St has smaller floors but it has 15 floors.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 6 guests